국가 건설기 원나라 행정 체제의 구축 과정에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Process of Administrative System Setting during Nation Building Period of Won Dynasty

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Mongolia and its successor, Won(元) did not have a system of governance that had historically been established. So, through national integration and conquest activities, they had to build a whole new organization to govern the wider land and population. Considering the nomadic features of the Mongolian tradition, it had to take over the system of Yoh(遼) and Guem(金), which was established by the same nomadic people.
In the Mongol Empire period, founded by Genghis Khan, the organization was formed as the Ten-Hundred-Thousand-Ten thousand family system, which combines military and administrative organizations for tribal unification and conquest. For the conquest ruling, one of the local co-operatives or the bureaucrats of the existing state was appointed as the administrative director. They were responsible for paying taxes and military munitions, mobilizing soldiers and labors, and oppressing people. Nevertheless, they appointed Darugachi as the reliable Mongolian administrator.
After founding of Won Dynasty by Sejo, more perfect ruling system was established. King Sejo inherited the system of Yow and Geum, and Song. He divided the central government power into three areas: Jung-seo-seong, Chu-mil-weon, Eo-sa-dae. The Six ministry, Bu belonged to Jung-seo- seong. In the local provinces, Haeng-seong, Haeng-dae etc. was established as the local government. Local administrative distract were divided into Ro-Bu-Joo-Hyun. Many reliable Mongolian were appointed as Darugachi, top bureaucrat or ruler in charge of each organization.
Through the Mongol empire period, a more elaborate Chinese-style governing system was established during the Won period. This was inevitable as the transition from nomadic to settlement. The same was true of the central government as well as the local government.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "金史"

2 김보광, "특집 고려 내 다루가치의 존재 양상과 영향 - 다루가치를 통한 몽골 지배방식의 경험 -" 한국역사연구회 (99) : 25-58, 2016

3 고명수, "쿠빌라이 집권 초기 관리등용의 성격-漢人儒士 중용 문제에 대한 비판적 검토" 동국역사문화연구소 (55) : 81-127, 2013

4 金浩東, "칭기스 칸의 子弟分封에 대한 再檢討―『集史』 <千戶一覽>의 分析을 중심으로―" 중앙아시아학회 9 : 29-65, 2004

5 이강한, "원제국인들의 방문 양상과 고려인들의 인식 변화" 한국중세사학회 (43) : 129-168, 2015

6 김호동, "울루스인가 칸국인가 - 몽골제국의 카안과 칸 칭호의 분석을 중심으로 -" 중앙아시아학회 21 (21): 1-29, 2016

7 이종수, "몽골제국의 탐라총관부 구조, 기능분석" 8 (8): 3-28, 2014

8 김호동, "몽골제국의 세계정복과 지배: 거시적 시론" 역사학회 (217) : 73-106, 2013

9 김호동, "몽골제국과 ‘大元’" 역사학회 (192) : 221-253, 2006

10 박소현, "몽골의 토올" 민속원 2005

11 유원수, "몽골비사: 원조비사" 사계절 2014

12 이명미, "몽골 복속기 권력구조의 성립 -元宗代 고려-몽골 관계와 권력구조의 변화-" 한국사연구회 (162) : 293-330, 2013

13 애탕송남, "대원제국" 혜안 2013

14 박원길, "대몽골(원)제국의 백성분류체계" 한국몽골학회 (41) : 1-27, 2015

15 박원길, "대몽골(원)제국 시대의 양마법(養馬法)과 가마장비" 43 : 1-88, 2015

16 전영준, "고려후기 제주 移居 元이주민과 通婚" 문화콘텐츠기술연구원 (15) : 395-425, 2013

17 "고려사"

18 김보광, "고려–몽골 관계의 전개와 다루가치의 置廢過程" 호서사학회 (76) : 83-119, 2015

19 고명수, "고려 주재 다루가치의 置廢경위와 존재양태 - 몽골의 고려정책 일 측면 -" 부경역사연구소 (39) : 41-74, 2016

20 "隋史"

21 "遼史"

22 "舊唐書"

23 "秦史"

24 "漢史"

25 "宋史"

26 조원, "大元제국 다루가치체제와 지방통치― 다루가치의 掌印權과 職任을 중심으로 ―" 동양사학회 (125) : 251-295, 2013

27 "唐史"

28 배숙희, "元나라의 耽羅 통치와 移住, 그리고 자취" 중국사학회 (76) : 95-122, 2012

29 "元史"

30 여치호, "元代 아스人(Asud)의 擡頭와 政治的 役割" 동양사학회 (120) : 181-222, 2012

31 이병렬, "13세기 대원제국의 탐라 다루가치 연구" 한국지방자치학회 26 (26): 269-286, 2014