한ㆍ일간의 수입쿼터분쟁에 관한 문제점과 대응방안 = Problems and Countermeasure on Dispute of Import Quarte between Korea and Japan

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The dispute issue between Korea and Japan frequently happens not only in the part of manufacturing industry but also that of agricultural and fishery products. That is why FTA negotiation and trade relations of agricultural and fishery products between the two countries have brought about serious problems. In spite of many negotiations among representatives of the two coutries, lavor IQ dispute is the first time Korea instituted a lawsuit on agricultural and fishery products to WTO.
Since Japanese government has decided to give lavor import quarters to China without permission of Korea, Korean government formally presented the system of lavor import quarter to WTO DSB due to WTO agreement disobedience of Japan.
Since Korean government establish strategy and analysis on the effects of lavor IQ dispute from now on, positive respond to seaweed dispute has influenced fishermen, related business enterprise, causing the greatest profits to Korea. But, Unless Korea change and prepare a few problems and countermeasures in the process of accomplishing agreements between the countries, the accomplishments will have no meanings. Furthermore, agricultural and fishery products will not be able to respond to non-tariff barriers of Japan.
Accordingly, some methods about trade barrier against Japan need to be solved from another viewpoint owing to lavor IQ dispute. It is necessary to have concrete strategy and countermeasures toward agricultural and fishery products. After solving all dispute problems, we need to consider how to proceed the lavor issues to efficiently perform the problems by means of administrative supervision. It is urgent to have proper support and be guided.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "한국해양수산개발원 내부자료" 2007년

2 대한무역진흥공사, "일본의 비관세장벽 현황" 대한무역진흥공사 1998

3 외교통상부, "우리나라와 관련된 분쟁현황" 다자통상협력과 2004

4 외무부, "우루과이 라운드 협상결과 및 평가" 외무부 1995

5 "외교통상부 아태담당 내부자료" 2007년

6 "수산물 수출입정보시스템 자료" 2005년

7 고준성, "쇠고기 문제를 WTO체제 출범 이후 반덤핑법의 운영에 대한 분석 평가" 통상법률, 법무부 2001

8 이종원, "개발도상국의 분쟁사례를 통한 우리나라의 대응방안" 한국국제상학회 18 (18): 2003

9 "纖維セフガド制度の槪要"

10 "纖維セフガドに係する國內規則の見直しについて" 日本輸出入取引審議會 第1回特別部會 議事要地 2000

11 유진수, "日本의 貿易障壁" 1992

12 "日本의 反ダンピング制度의 現況과 運用" (18) : 1999

13 "平成9事年度における輸入通關後の稅關調査績について"

14 "不公正貿易報告書" 1999

15 "http : //www.wto.org/dispute Settlement/ 2007년 1월 7일" 2007

16 "http : //www.ldcs.org/ 2007년 1월 8일" 2007

17 "WTO회원국 비관세장벽 제출 리스트" 2004년

18 대한무역진흥공사한국섬유직물수출조합, "WTO협정과 새로운 수출기회" 대한무역진흥공사한국섬유직물수출조합 1996

19 신유균, "WTO체제와 주요국의 세이프가드제도" 두남출판사 1997

20 채욱, "WTO분쟁해결 사례 연구: 일본의 주세에 관한 분쟁" 대외정책연구소 1997

21 이종원, "WTO관련 환경규정에 관한 고찰" 한국상사법학회 19 (19): 2001

22 윤영각, "WTO 시대의 반덤핑제도" 한송 1998

23 "The WTO after Seattle Institute for International Economics"

24 "The Dispute Settlement System of the World Trade" 1999

25 "System Since 1948"

26 "Organization and the Evolution of the GATT Dispute Settlement"

27 WTO, "More Delegulation and Structural Reforms should help Japan Stimulate Domestic Demand and Encourage Market Access" Press/TPRB 1998

28 "L.and S. Young. ＂WTO Disputes and Developing" 1999

29 "Going Bananas? Dispute Resolution Agriculture, In" 1998

30 "First Step in Exporting to Japan"

31 "Experience of Developing Nations In Dispute Resolution in the"

32 "Dispute Settlement under the GATT/WTO: The" 1998

33 "Dispute Settlement and a New Round" 2000

34 "Countries＂, Journal of World Trade"

35 "Changing Face of Japanese Retai」l"