설치예술이 지니는 정치성, 네트워크와 그 언설에 있다 = Installation Art and China’s Political Nature, Lies in Network and Discourse

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper has its focus on examining two contemporary Chinese artists, Ai Weiwei and Huang Yongping, and the politics that is created by a discourse strategy in the works of these two installation artists.
The main focus of this essay are twofold. One is the materiality that is in the installation artwork itself. This indicates a one-time, space taking and planetary object in the artwork. This kind of installation artwork that contains a planetary characteristic forms a discourse that uses a metaphor which does not indicate the reality directly. The other is the futility that is within the artwork. The phrase “No use for anything” indicates everyone aesthetically or economically, and the artwork that is visible to the naked eye is made up of things that have nothing to do with political issues. These works are made impossible to be a private artwork or goes through a list of a stunning visualization and incredible size for the audience to experience a event-like nature. This is new form of knowledge network operation that does not become abandoned. Intense feelings that the artwork gives does not directly contact with the physical materialization that the artwork shows, but the message that the artwork gives is strongly performed. Therefore by a new discourse strategy that is created between Ai Weiwei and Huang Yongping that contains the two natures above, the matter that is created by a materialization and the abstraction that seems useless embodies into the political domain.
In addition, the overall framework of this paper, so to speak, submitting invisible testimonies and the theory that artworks can be made political through the materializing operation was brought from Jacques Ranciere.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 설치예술이 지니는 공간성
• 2. 믹스트 텍스춰가 구성하는 언설성
• 3. 오브제의 해체성
• 4. 작품의 언설들과 담론
• 〈參考文獻〉
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최광진, "현대미술의 전략" 아트북스 2004

2 김영미, "현대 중국의 새로운 이미지 언어 A Study on New 'Image-Language'of Contemporary China" 이담 2014

3 미셀푸코, "지식의 고고학" 민음사 2000

4 자크 랑시에르, "이미지의 운명" 현실문화 2014

5 이정우, "사건의 철학" 그린비 2011

6 자크 랑시에르, "미학안의 불편함" 인간사랑 2009

7 서동욱, "미술은 철학의 눈이다" 문학과지성사 2014

8 "http://www.michel-foucault.com/concepts/"

9 "http://monoskop.org/images/9/90/Foucault_Michel_Archaeology_of_Knowledge.pdf"

10 Michel Foucault, "The archaeology of Knowlege and discourse on language" Pantheom Books 1972

11 Philip Tinari Peter Pakesch Dr, "Charles Merewether, AI WEIWEI WORKS 2004-2007" Galerie Urs Meile 2007