RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      구현주의 인지 vs. 계산주의 인지 = 윤보석 교수의 계산주의와 구현주의 양립론 비판

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102420549

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In 2007 I wrote an article concerning the theory of embodied mind. In it, the computational theory of mind was mentioned marginally and briefly. Thereafter Prof. Bosuk Yoon cited in his article that was published in 2008, a sentence from my work and then raised some criticisms that I had misunderstood the computational theory of mind and, as a result of it, wrongly had taken the two positions for incompatible. Meanwhile Prof. Yoon, who belongs to the camp of the externalized computational theory of mind. argues that the computational theory of mind and the theory of embodied mind are both compatible. A major reason for this is that the computational theory of mind, just same as the theory of embodied mind, sees also body, environment and circumstances as needed for the explanation of the mind. In this article I raise some comments on his misinterpretation of my article and raise some reasons why his arguments are not convincing in reconciling the two positions. As a result, I try to show that the theory of embodied mind is much better than the extended computational theory of mind in explaining the mind or cognition. During this discussion, some core ideas of the theory of embodied mind will be presented.
      번역하기

      In 2007 I wrote an article concerning the theory of embodied mind. In it, the computational theory of mind was mentioned marginally and briefly. Thereafter Prof. Bosuk Yoon cited in his article that was published in 2008, a sentence from my work and t...

      In 2007 I wrote an article concerning the theory of embodied mind. In it, the computational theory of mind was mentioned marginally and briefly. Thereafter Prof. Bosuk Yoon cited in his article that was published in 2008, a sentence from my work and then raised some criticisms that I had misunderstood the computational theory of mind and, as a result of it, wrongly had taken the two positions for incompatible. Meanwhile Prof. Yoon, who belongs to the camp of the externalized computational theory of mind. argues that the computational theory of mind and the theory of embodied mind are both compatible. A major reason for this is that the computational theory of mind, just same as the theory of embodied mind, sees also body, environment and circumstances as needed for the explanation of the mind. In this article I raise some comments on his misinterpretation of my article and raise some reasons why his arguments are not convincing in reconciling the two positions. As a result, I try to show that the theory of embodied mind is much better than the extended computational theory of mind in explaining the mind or cognition. During this discussion, some core ideas of the theory of embodied mind will be presented.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이기흥, "현대에서의 구현주의적 전회" 철학연구회 (79) : 319-338, 2007

      2 윤보석, "계산주의는 구현주의와 양립가능한가? 인간과 환경의 경계에 대한 한 고찰" 철학연구회 (83) : 187-209, 2008

      3 Wilson, Robert A., "Wide Computationalism" 103 : 351-372, 1994

      4 Glenberg, Arthur M., "What memory is for" 20 : 1-55, 1997

      5 Marr D., "Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information" W. H. Freeman and Company 29-61, 1982

      6 Pfeifer, R., "Understanding Intelligence" MIT Press 1999

      7 Harnad, S., "The symbol grounding problem" 42 : 335-346, 1990

      8 Clark A., "The extended mind" 58 : 10-23, 1998

      9 Brown, J. S., "Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning" 18 : 32-42, 1989

      10 Lakoff, G., "Philosophy in the flesh, the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought" Basic Books 1999

      1 이기흥, "현대에서의 구현주의적 전회" 철학연구회 (79) : 319-338, 2007

      2 윤보석, "계산주의는 구현주의와 양립가능한가? 인간과 환경의 경계에 대한 한 고찰" 철학연구회 (83) : 187-209, 2008

      3 Wilson, Robert A., "Wide Computationalism" 103 : 351-372, 1994

      4 Glenberg, Arthur M., "What memory is for" 20 : 1-55, 1997

      5 Marr D., "Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information" W. H. Freeman and Company 29-61, 1982

      6 Pfeifer, R., "Understanding Intelligence" MIT Press 1999

      7 Harnad, S., "The symbol grounding problem" 42 : 335-346, 1990

      8 Clark A., "The extended mind" 58 : 10-23, 1998

      9 Brown, J. S., "Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning" 18 : 32-42, 1989

      10 Lakoff, G., "Philosophy in the flesh, the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought" Basic Books 1999

      11 Searle, J., "Minds, Brains and Programs" 3 : 417-457, 1980

      12 Dreyfus, H. L., "Intelligence without representation-Merleau-Ponty’s critique of mental representation. The relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanatio" 1 : 367-383, 2002

      13 Brooks, R. A., "Intelligence without representation" 47 : 139-159, 1991

      14 McClamrock, Ron, "Existential Cognition, Computational Minds in the World" University of Chicago Press 1995

      15 Proffitt, D. R., "Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action" 1 (1): 110-122, 2006

      16 Anderson, M. L., "Embodied Cognition: A field guide" 149 : 91-130, 2003

      17 Campos, J. J., "Early experience and emotional development: the emergence of fear of heights" 3 : 61-64, 1992

      18 Smith, Linda B., "Development as a Dynamic System" 7 : 343-348, 2003

      19 Turing, A., "Computing Machinary and Intelligence" 59 : 433-460, 1950

      20 Hutchins E., "Cognition in the Wild" MIT Press 1995

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.54 0.54 0.46
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.45 0.53 1.168 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼