의사결정론을 통한 방호요구수준 판단방안 제시에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Method for Judging the Required Protection Capacity

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Protective facilities are the last means of ensuring the survivability of personnel and assets, and there is a greateramount of matters to consider than those of general buildings. However, the Defense Military Facilities Criteria andthe Ministry of the Interior and Safety, Ordinance No. 20, are only considering the expected enemy threats. In thisstudy, we use objective and statistical methods to refine the consideration of the required capacity of protection basedon the opinions of the experts. Specifically, the study adopts the Delphi technique associating the experts related to 30defense military facilities criteria. The first-round questions were open-ended, and it compiled the points to considerrelated to the bulletproof and explosion - proof design. The second questionnaire was applied as closed questionnairewith 7 points scale methods. As a result of the factor analysis on the opinions of the experts, it was confirmed thatthe protection requirement level was due to METT + TC.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

방호시설은 인원과 자산의 생존성을 보장할 수 있는 최후의 수단으로서 일반 건축물보다 고려해야 할 사항이 많다. 하지만 국방·군사 시설기준 및 행정안전부 훈령에서군·관의 방호기준은 적 위협만을 고려하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 전문가 집단의 의견을 통해 객관적이고 통계적 방법을 사용하여 방호요구수준의 고려사항을 재선정하고자한다. 연구방법은 델파이기법을 사용하였으며, 21명의 국방·군사 시설기준과 관련 있는 전문가들을 선정하였다. 1차 설문은 개방형 질문으로 방탄·방폭 설계시 방호요구수준의 고려사항을 종합하였고, 2차 설문은 폐쇄형 질문으로7점 척도법을 적용하였다. 채택된 전문가의 의견에 대해요인분석을 실시한 결과, 방호요구수준의 고려사항이METT+TC에 기인한다는 것을 확인하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박병희, "외부폭발에 대한 엄체호의 폭발 안전성 평가 및 방호설계기준 연구" 금오공과대학교 대학원 2008

2 이종찬, "군사 방호구조물의 방호성능 평가요소 개선안 기초연구" 대한건축학회 22 (22): 31-38, 2006

3 Kaiser HF, "The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis" 23 (23): 187-200, 1958

4 Cattell RB, "The scree test for the number of factors" 1 (1): 245-276, 1966

5 Bahr NJ, "System safety engineering and risk assessment: a practical approach" CRC Press 272-, 2014

6 O’connor BP, "SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test" 32 (32): 396-402, 2000

7 Marshall HE, "Risk mitigation plan for optimizing protection of constructed facilities" 46 (46): 26-33, 2004

8 FEMA, "Risk Assessment; A how-to guide to mitigate potential terrorist attacks against buildings"

9 Ministry of the Interior and Safety, "Ordinance No. 20. Regulations on the Establishment of Emergency Evacuation Facilities of Government Offices"

10 Thompson B, "Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications" 31 (31): 245-248, 2007

11 Defense Installations Agency, "Department Military Facilities Criteria 2-20-10. Design Criteria for explosion-proof and bullet-proof facilities"

12 Cruz AM, "Consideration of natural hazards in the design and risk management of industrial facilities" 44 (44): 213-227, 2008