원위 쇄골 골절의 보존적 치료 후 발생한 불유합의 관련 인자

국문 초록 (Abstract)

목적: 보존적 요법을 시행한 원위 쇄골 골절 환자의 치료 결과 및 불유합과 관련된 인자를 분석하고자 하였다.
대상 및 방법: 29명의 환자를 대상으로 하였으며, 단순 방사선 사진을 통해 Neer 분류, 오구 쇄골 간 거리, 초기 전위 및 분쇄 여부, 골유합 여부를 알아보았다. 임상적 결과 판정을 위해 최종 추시 시 University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) 점수, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) 점수 및 subjective shoulder value (SSV)를 측정하였다.
결과: 6예(20.7%)에서 불유합이 발생하였으며, 증상이 없는 불유합이 3예였다. 유합 군에서 최종 추시 시 평균 UCLA, ASES, SSV 점수는 30.9점, 88.3점, 87.0점이었고, 불유합 군에서는 26.7점, 76.2점, 70.8점이었으나 두 군 간의 통계적 유의성은 없었다. 고령 및 수상 당시 오구 쇄골 간 거리가 길수록 불유합의 빈도가 높았다(p=0.047, p=0.007).
결론: 원위 쇄골 골절의 보존적 치료 후 만족할 만한 중기 추시 임상적 결과를 보였으며, 고령 및 수상 당시 오구 쇄 간골 거리가 길었던 경우에 불유합이 잘 발생하는 것으로 나타났다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiological and clinical outcomes and to analyze factors associated with nonunion after conservative management in patients with distal clavicle fracture.
Materials and Methods: We analyzed 29 cases. Neer type, coracoclavicular distance (CCD), initial displacement, comminution, union, and presence of bony union were evaluated by plain radiographs. Clinical outcomes according to University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and subjective shoulder value (SSV) scores were assessed.
Results: Six cases (20.7%) had developed nonunion. Three cases had asymptomatic nonunion. Mean UCLA, ASES, and SSV scores were 30.9, 88.3, and 87.0 in the union group and 26.7, 76.2, and 70.8 in the nonunion group. Although the nonunion group had inferior clinical outcome compared to the union group, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Older age and more CCD showed correlation with nonunion (p=0.047, p=0.007).
Conclusion: Conservative management of distal clavicle fractures provided satisfactory clinical outcomes. The rate of symptomatic nonunion was 10.4%. Occurrence of nonunion showed correlation with older age and more CCD.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 서론
• 대상 및 방법
• 결과
• 고찰
• 결론
• REFERENCES

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 오주한, "쇄골 골절 치료의 최근 경향" 대한견주관절학회 15 (15): 43-51, 2012

2 Hessmann M, "Treatment of unstable distal clavicular fractures with and without lesions of the acromioclavicular joint" 27 : 47-52, 1996

3 Nordqvist A, "The natural course of lateral clavicle fracture. 15 (11-21) year follow-up of 110 cases" 64 : 87-91, 1993

4 Robinson CM, "Primary nonoperative treatment of displaced lateral fractures of the clavicle" 86 : 778-782, 2004

5 Deafenbaugh MK, "Nonoperative treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures: a prospective study" 20 : 405-413, 1990

6 Banerjee R, "Management of distal clavicle fractures" 19 : 392-401, 2011

7 Neviaser RJ., "Injuries to the clavicle and acromioclavicular joint" 18 : 433-438, 1987

8 Neer CS 2nd., "Fractures of the distal third of the clavicle" 58 : 43-50, 1968

9 Robinson CM., "Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification" 80 : 476-484, 1998

10 Heppenstall RB, "Fractures and dislocations of the distal clavicle" 6 : 477-486, 1975

11 Neer CS 2nd., "Fracture of the distal clavicle with detachment of the coracoclavicular ligaments in adults" 3 : 99-110, 1963

12 Anderson K., "Evaluation and treatment of distal clavicle fractures" 22 : 319-326, 2003

13 Robinson CM, "Estimating the risk of nonunion following nonoperative treatment of a clavicular fracture" 86 : 1359-1365, 2004

14 Rokito AS, "A comparison of nonoperative and operative treatment of type II distal clavicle fractures" 61 : 32-39, 2002