http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107793920
윤영인 (영산대학교)
2006
Korean
The Ming was not a successor to the Mongol Yuan Empire ; but it had merely established an independent Han Chinese regime that occupied a part of the world empire. Similarly ; the Manchu Qing Empire(Daicing gurun) did not succeed but conquered the Chinese Ming dynasty. Whereas the Ming was satisfied as a “lesser empire” ruling over the traditional Han territory of the “Central Plain ; ” the Manchus built a large empire twice the size of the Ming through conquest of the “border regions” of Xinjiang ; Tibet ; Mongolia ; Manchuria ; and Taiwan in the 17th and 18th centuries. The “border regions” were joined not to “China” but to the Manchu Qing Empire. The Qing control fundamentally changed society and economy of those regions ; and they finally became “integral” parts of China ; and the spatial and ethnic make-up of today’s China had been newly constituted only during the Manchu Qing period. The separate ethnic identity of the Manchus was one of the most important element in their rule over the vast multi-ethnic empire. ; most studies have followed the rather simple notion that the Manchus had been “sinicized” and lost their own identity. A few Western scholars now reject this simplistic Sinocentric perspective ; and this paper presents a brief overview of the recent Western academic works that approach the Qing history from the “Manchu-centered” or “Inner Asian” perspectives.
학술저널
11-20(10쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드
라오서(老舍)의 〈四世同堂〉에 나타난 傳統意識 비판과 抗日意識의 변화
Constructing “the Truth” Japanese Anthropologists in the Making of Manchukuo
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 0.95 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.8 | 0.83 | 1.738 | 0 |