RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      과학 실험 수업의 실험조 편성에 관한 연구 = Formation of experimental teams in school laboratory

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10060173

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      We put a lot of interests in the effective way to form a lab group in the lab class of science. Currently, the lab class in Korea is progressed according to lab group formation of random division monotonously. In other words, a class is divided into a certain number of lab groups randomly and the groups perform the experiment they were given.
      Therefore, we came up with 2 different method to form the lab group and tried to analyze understanding on science and academic achievement of each method. In one method, each group was formed with 7 students according the student numbers. In the other method, each group was formed with 7 students that had similar grades in a field of science test.
      In order to achieve the goal of the study, the study was done on students in the 1st grade. The first formation method was applied from the end of mid-term exam to the beginning of final exam in the first semester and the second formation method was applied from the beginning of the second semester till the beginning of mid-term exam in the second semester. Also, the results of final exam of first semester and midterm-exam of second semester were analyzed to compare the effect of the two formation method.
      번역하기

      We put a lot of interests in the effective way to form a lab group in the lab class of science. Currently, the lab class in Korea is progressed according to lab group formation of random division monotonously. In other words, a class is divided into a...

      We put a lot of interests in the effective way to form a lab group in the lab class of science. Currently, the lab class in Korea is progressed according to lab group formation of random division monotonously. In other words, a class is divided into a certain number of lab groups randomly and the groups perform the experiment they were given.
      Therefore, we came up with 2 different method to form the lab group and tried to analyze understanding on science and academic achievement of each method. In one method, each group was formed with 7 students according the student numbers. In the other method, each group was formed with 7 students that had similar grades in a field of science test.
      In order to achieve the goal of the study, the study was done on students in the 1st grade. The first formation method was applied from the end of mid-term exam to the beginning of final exam in the first semester and the second formation method was applied from the beginning of the second semester till the beginning of mid-term exam in the second semester. Also, the results of final exam of first semester and midterm-exam of second semester were analyzed to compare the effect of the two formation method.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • 표목차 = ⅲ
      • Abstract = ⅳ
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • 표목차 = ⅲ
      • Abstract = ⅳ
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구 문제 = 3
      • 3. 연구의 의의 = 3
      • Ⅱ. 학업 성취도에 대한 평가 방법 = 6
      • 1. 학업성취도 평가란 = 6
      • 2. 블룸(Bloom)의 행동목표 분류 준거 = 7
      • 3. 학업성취도의 평가 방법 = 9
      • 1) 지필 고사 = 9
      • Ⅲ. 연구대상과 실험 절차 = 10
      • 1. 연구 대상 및 환경적 요인 = 10
      • 2. 실험 계획 = 11
      • 3. 실험 수업에서의 실험조 편성 방법 = 12
      • 4. 평가 도구 = 13
      • 5. 실험 연구의 한계 = 14
      • 6. 실험조 편성 방법에서의 기대효과 = 15
      • Ⅳ. 결과 분석 = 19
      • 1. 지식에 대한 분석 = 19
      • 2. 이해에 대한 분석 = 21
      • 3. 적용에 대한 분석 = 23
      • 4. 총점에 대한 분석 = 24
      • 5. 학교에서 실시한 총점에 대한 분석 = 27
      • Ⅴ. 요약 및 논의 = 31
      • 참고문헌 = 33
      • 부록 = 34
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼