It was the existence of sentences like (ⅰ), containing phrasal verbs, or verb-particle constructions, which led Bar-Hillel et al. (1960) to conclude that categorial grammars were inadequate to analyze natural language: (ⅰ) He looked it up. Bar-H...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30064391
1992
Korean
305
학술저널
37-61(25쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
It was the existence of sentences like (ⅰ), containing phrasal verbs, or verb-particle constructions, which led Bar-Hillel et al. (1960) to conclude that categorial grammars were inadequate to analyze natural language: (ⅰ) He looked it up. Bar-H...
It was the existence of sentences like (ⅰ), containing phrasal verbs, or verb-particle constructions, which led Bar-Hillel et al. (1960) to conclude that categorial grammars were inadequate to analyze natural language:
(ⅰ) He looked it up.
Bar-Hillel assumed that the particle up in (1) was a syntactic operator that looked for a complement intransitive verb to its left to form a transitive verb. Although other reasonable categoty assignments can be imagined, there's no disputing that because look is not immediately adjacent to up in (ⅰ), their categories cannot cancel under functional application as required. The problem is of course general, touching all the discontinuities.
This study is organized as follows. First, we will introduce the categorial syntax to be used in the analysis and will summarize the previous treatment of discontinuity within this syntax. An alternative to this treatment, which makes crucial use of the possibility of adjoining non-adjacent constituents, is proposed and justified. Second, we will discuss the structural and pragmatic constraints which limit the possibilities for discontinuity in the syntax. Third, it will be argued that there is a division of labor between the two alternatives introduced in chapter one.
한미 유아의 이어 발화(two-word utterances)에 관한연구