RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The Effects of Variety and Visual Cue on Perceived Quantity and Consumer Attitude toward Participation into Sales Promotion Events

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106177937

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Most studies on how people perceive a given quantity of items were conducted with visual cues exclusively and only offered spatial area based explanations, such as spatial estimation and perceptual grouping theories. This article establishes how people perceive a given quantity when only a written description is provided without any visual cues. Across two studies we show that variety decreases perceived quantity when a variety cue is given, while variety increases perceived quantity when a visual cue is not given. This is because people tend to rely heavily on spatial areas when a visual cue is present and because people are prone to confirmation bias when they are provided with no visual cues but only written descriptions. Furthermore, we highlight that quantity perception has a mediation effect on consumers’ attitude―the intention to participate in sales promotional events. Lastly, we summarize the article and discuss its contributions, implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research
      번역하기

      Most studies on how people perceive a given quantity of items were conducted with visual cues exclusively and only offered spatial area based explanations, such as spatial estimation and perceptual grouping theories. This article establishes how peopl...

      Most studies on how people perceive a given quantity of items were conducted with visual cues exclusively and only offered spatial area based explanations, such as spatial estimation and perceptual grouping theories. This article establishes how people perceive a given quantity when only a written description is provided without any visual cues. Across two studies we show that variety decreases perceived quantity when a variety cue is given, while variety increases perceived quantity when a visual cue is not given. This is because people tend to rely heavily on spatial areas when a visual cue is present and because people are prone to confirmation bias when they are provided with no visual cues but only written descriptions. Furthermore, we highlight that quantity perception has a mediation effect on consumers’ attitude―the intention to participate in sales promotional events. Lastly, we summarize the article and discuss its contributions, implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Yin, Dezhi, "When Do Consumers Value Positive vs. Negative Reviews? An Empirical Investigation of Confirmation Bias in Online Word of Mouth" 27 (27): 131-144, 2016

      2 Raghubir, Priya, "Vital Dimensions in Volume Perception: Can the Eye Fool the Stomach?" 36 (36): 313-326, 1999

      3 Dehaene, Stanislas, "Varieties of Numerical Abilities" 44 : 1-42, 1992

      4 Piazza, Manuela, "Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcas" 44 (44): 547-555, 2004

      5 Frith, Christopher D., "The Solitaire Illusion : An Illusion of Numerosity" 11 (11): 409-410, 1972

      6 Jeong, H. G., "The Short-Lived Benefits of Variety Seeking Among the Chronically Indecisive" 22 (22): 423-435, 2016

      7 Redden, Joseph P., "The Presence of Variety Reduces Perceived Quantity" 23 (23): 406-417, 2009

      8 Dehaene, Stanislas, "The Number Sense : How the Mind Creates Mathematics" Oxford University Press 1997

      9 Donthu, N., "The Infomercial Shopper" 36 : 69-76, 1996

      10 Donthu, N., "The Infomercial Shopper" 36 : 69-76, 1996

      1 Yin, Dezhi, "When Do Consumers Value Positive vs. Negative Reviews? An Empirical Investigation of Confirmation Bias in Online Word of Mouth" 27 (27): 131-144, 2016

      2 Raghubir, Priya, "Vital Dimensions in Volume Perception: Can the Eye Fool the Stomach?" 36 (36): 313-326, 1999

      3 Dehaene, Stanislas, "Varieties of Numerical Abilities" 44 : 1-42, 1992

      4 Piazza, Manuela, "Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcas" 44 (44): 547-555, 2004

      5 Frith, Christopher D., "The Solitaire Illusion : An Illusion of Numerosity" 11 (11): 409-410, 1972

      6 Jeong, H. G., "The Short-Lived Benefits of Variety Seeking Among the Chronically Indecisive" 22 (22): 423-435, 2016

      7 Redden, Joseph P., "The Presence of Variety Reduces Perceived Quantity" 23 (23): 406-417, 2009

      8 Dehaene, Stanislas, "The Number Sense : How the Mind Creates Mathematics" Oxford University Press 1997

      9 Donthu, N., "The Infomercial Shopper" 36 : 69-76, 1996

      10 Donthu, N., "The Infomercial Shopper" 36 : 69-76, 1996

      11 Frick, Robert W., "The Homogeneity Effect in Counting" 41 (41): 8-16, 1987

      12 Folkes, Valerie, "The Effect of Package Shape on Consumers Judgments of Product Volume : Attention as a Mental Contaminant" 31 (31): 390-401, 2004

      13 Frey, D., "The Effect of Negative Feedback About Oneself and Cost of Information on Preferences for Information About the Source of This Feedback" 17 : 42-50, 1981

      14 Kaufman, E. L., "The Discrimination of Visual Number" 62 : 498-525, 1949

      15 Snyder, M., "Testing Hypotheses About Other People : Strategies of Verification and Falsification" 7 : 39-43, 1981

      16 Mandler, George, "Subitizing : An Analysis of Its Component Processes" 111 (111): 1-22, 1982

      17 Johnston, L., "Resisting Change : Informationseeking and Stereotype Change" 26 : 799-825, 1996

      18 Schulz-Hardt, Stefan, "Realitdtsflucht in Entscheidungsprozessen: Von Groupthink Zum Entscheidungsautismus [Loosing Reality in Decision Processes: From Groupthink to Autistic Decision Making]" Huber 1997

      19 Ginsburg, Norman, "Perceived Numerosity, Item Arrangement, and Expectancy" 91 (91): 267-273, 1978

      20 Krueger, Lester E., "Perceived Numerosity" 11 : 5-9, 1972

      21 Tversky, Amos, "Judgment Under Uncertainty : Heuristics and Biases" 185 (185): 1124-1131, 1974

      22 Vos, Piet G., "Interactions Between Area and Numerosity" 50 : 148-154, 1988

      23 Yadav, Manjit S., "How Buyers Evaluate Product Bundles : A Model of Anchoring and Adjustment" 21 (21): 342-353, 1994

      24 Janis, I. L., "Groupthink" Houghton Mifflin 235-246, 1982

      25 Pinkley, R. L., "Fixed Pie a La Mode : Information Availability, Information Processing, and the Negotiation of Suboptimal Agreements" 62 : 101-112, 1995

      26 Baumgartner, H., "Exploratory Consumer Buying Behavior : Conceptualization and Measurement" 13 : 121-137, 1996

      27 Nemeth, C. J., "Dissent and the Search for Information" 35 : 67-76, 1996

      28 Broniarczyk, Susan M., "Consumers Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category : The Impact of Item Reduction" 35 (35): 166-176, 1998

      29 Jonas, Eva, "Confirmation Bias in Sequential Information Search After Preliminary Decisions : An Expansion of Dissonance Theoretical Research on Selective Exposure to Information" 80 (80): 557-571, 2001

      30 Nickerson, Raymond S., "Confirmation Bias : A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises" 2 (2): 175-220, 1998

      31 Garbarino, Ellen C., "Cognitive Effort, Affect, and Choice" 24 (24): 147-158, 1997

      32 Huang, Liqiang, "Can We Select Two Colors Simultaneously?" 6 (6): 1101-, 2006

      33 Schulz-Hardt, Stefan, "Biased Information Search in Group Decision Making" 78 : 655-669, 2000

      34 Raghubir, Priya, "As the Crow Flies : Bias in Consumers’Map-Based Distance Judgments" 36 (36): 26-39, 1996

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-05-10 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korean Marketing Association KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-05-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Asian Journal of Marketing -> Asia Marketing Journal KCI등재
      2012-02-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국마케팅저널 -> 아시아마케팅저널
      외국어명 : Korean Journal of Marketing -> Asian Journal of Marketing
      KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.1 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.45 0.67 0.318 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼