상표법상 상품분류 및 유사판단제도의 운용상 문제점 및 개선방안연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The “Examining Manual for the similarity of goods” of KIPO was made to increase fairness and objectivity of examining procedures by applying the basic principles in determining a similarity of goods. As the examiner’s conclusion is bound by the rules for the similarity of goods, trademark examiner do not proceed examination individually to determine whether goods are similar to each other when it comes to examination practices. Rather, the examiner in principle draws its conclusion through the presumption based on similar group codes which are crucial to define the scope of similarity of goods. Since the presumption mostly attributes to the valid conclusion, the determination of similarity of goods along with similar group codes gain strength in examinations. However, its conclusion is not always effective since the presumption based on similar group codes could be reversed by contrary evidences. The absence of experts who take full charge of goods trade has caused the lack of knowledge and information on the specific trade terms and conditions. Under this circumstance, KIPO has cursorily and indiscriminately conducted classification of goods and similar group codes that hardly reflected real goods trades from now on. In this regard, the similar group codes have limitations to catching up with the changes in goods and service industries according to the industry development and the changing culture. Considering the classification of goods is the rigid classification system that can not promptly respond to the market changes, it is imperative that the enhanced classification system should be designed to quickly reflect the ever changing market conditions in which new products are on the markets day by day. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to update the classification system which reflects well current trade situations on a regular basis, and seeks plans for the establishment of systematic and long lasting system, which enable the examining manual for similarity of goods to amend to reflect the changes in trade conditions.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 외국의 동향
• 1. 미국
• 2. 일본
• 3. 시사점
• Ⅲ. 국내의 상품유사여부 판단을 둘러싼 문제점
• 1. 서설
• 2. 상품분류 및 유사군코드제도의 운영실태 및 문제점
• 3. 판례의 태도
• 4. 소결
• Ⅳ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 송영식, "지적소유권법(하)[제9판]" 육법사 2005

2 특허청, "유사상품․서비스업 심사기준(니스 제9판기준)"

3 특허청, "유사상품․서비스업 심사기준"

4 박준석, "우리 판례상 상표의 동일․유사에 관한 고찰" 서울대 1997

5 특허청, "서비스업 유사군 코드 해설집"

6 특허청, "상품유사판단기준 재정립방안에 관한 연구"

7 장현옥, "상품심사의 정확성제고방안, 상표ㆍ디자인 심사쟁점연구보고서" 특허청 2008

8 특허청 상표디자인심사정책팀, "상품분류의 현실 적합성 제고를 위한 상품분류 법령체계 개편 계획"

9 전효숙, "상표와 상품의 동일ㆍ유사, 지적소유권에 관한 제문제(하)"

10 박성태,상표법상 상품,서비스업 및 상표의 유사에 관한 고찰,충남대 특허법무대학원, "상표법상 상품, 서비스업 및 상표의 유사에 관한 고찰" 충남대 특허법무대학원 2005

11 문삼섭, "상표법[제2판]" 세창출판사 2004

12 최덕규, "상표법[전정판]" 세창출판사 1999

13 특허청, "미국 상표법․제도에 관한 분석 및 시사점"

14 日本特許庁, "類似商品․役務審査基準の見直しの現状"

15 樋口 豊治, "商標法上の商品․役務とその類否(1/3-3/3)" 일본변리사회 56 (56): 2001

16 村上 晃一, "商標法における商品․役務の類否について" 57 (57): 2007

17 齊藤 秀美, "商標権侵害における商品․役務区分と類否の関係性－たびたま事件" 60 (60): 2007

18 石井　茂樹, "商品․役務の類否" 일본변리사회 60 (60): 2007

19 廣田 美穂, "去來實情を考慮した指定商品に關 する檢討․考察" 58 (58): 2008

20 "http://web2.westlaw.com"

21 "TEMP §1207(Refusal on Basis of Likelihood of Confusion, Mistake or Deception"

22 "McCarthy on Trademark and Unfair Competition, 4th ed., Volumes 6" Clark Boardman Callaghan 2002

23 "37 C.F.R. PART 6—CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES UNDER THE TRADEMARK ACT"

24 특허청, "2007 지식재산백서"