RISS 검색 - 국내학술지논문 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Study Design: Prospective observational study (n=74).
Purpose: To evaluate the learning curve for exoscope and three-dimensional (3D) 4K hybrid visualization in terms of operating time, advantages, disadvantages, and surgical complications in tubular-access minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) and to assess surgeon satisfaction with image quality, ergonomics, and ability to perform target site treatment.
Overview of Literature: Working through tubular retractors poses a challenge. The extreme angulations during microsurgical decompression, especially contralateral decompression, require surgeons to work non-ergonomically. An exoscope allows surgeons to work ergonomically and independently of the microscope oculars as visualizations are now provided by large 3D 4K monitors. However, the value and efficacy of solely depending on an exoscope and 3D 4K monitors during microsurgical work are still unknown.
Methods: Seventy-four patients (99 levels) underwent trans-tubular MISS between March 2018 and January 2019. Five patients were excluded: one had pyogenic discitis, two had revisions, and two were trans-tubular transoral. In total, we analyzed 69 for operating time, blood loss, and complications. The learning curve graph was plotted using the surgical time for each procedure. Surgeons were asked to rate their satisfaction with image quality, ability to maintain ergonomic posture, and efficient target site treatment.
Results: For tubular microdiscectomy, the operating time plateaued after six cases, and for tubular decompression and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, the operating time plateaued after nine cases. Mean operating time was significantly reduced after the plateau. Complications included four cases of dural tear. All patients improved symptomatically, and there were no postoperative neurological deficits.
Conclusions: Use of the exoscope has a short learning curve. Surgeons benefit from improved ergonomic posture during surgery, and resident teaching appears to be good. The only drawback is the need to rearrange the operating table setup. Complications were comparable to those when using the surgical microscope. An exoscope with hybrid digital visualization provides excellent visualization, depth perception, clarity, and precision target site treatment.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Overdevest GM, "Tubular discectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation : long-term results of a randomised controlled trial" 88 : 1008-1016, 2017

2 Garneau JC, "The use of the exoscope in lateral skull base surgery : advantages and limitations" 40 : 236-240, 2019

3 Caspar W, "The Caspar microsurgical discectomy and comparison with a conventional standard lumbar disc procedure" 28 : 78-86, 1991

4 Guana R, "Skills comparison in pediatric residents using a 2-dimensional versus a 3-dimensional high-definition camera in a pediatric laparoscopic simulator" 74 : 644-649, 2017

5 Goald HJ, "Microlumbar discectomy : followup of 147patients" 3 : 183-185, 1978

6 Williams RW, "Microlumbar discectomy : a conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc" 3 : 175-182, 1978

7 Schick U, "Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open surgery : an intraoperative EMG study" 11 : 20-26, 2002

8 Brock M, "Lumbar microdiscectomy : subperiosteal versus transmuscular approach and influence on the early postoperative analgesic consumption" 17 : 518-522, 2008

9 Gempt J, "Long-term follow-up of standard microdiscectomy versus minimal access surgery for lumbar disc herniations" 155 : 2333-2338, 2013

10 Kwan K, "Lessons learned using a high-definition 3-dimensional exoscope for spinal surgery" 16 : 619-625, 2019