RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      후스(胡適)의 한대 유교 이해― 중국 종교사의 관점에서 = Hu-Shi’s Understanding of the Han Confucianism

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106914219

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      It is well known that Hu-Shi(胡適) gradually abandoned the term ‘history of philosophy’ and began to use the term ‘intellectual hoistory’ from the late 1920s. I don’t think it is just a shift from philosophy to thoughts. It is more appropriate to say that Hu’s view has expanded from history of philosophy to cultural history or the history of religions. Hu’s study of the Han Confucianism is the result of exploring the theoretical aspects and social role of the Confucianism as a religion. Hu-Shi did not declare that the thoughts of the Han Confucianism were the development of the main streams of Qi Xue(齊學). However, we were able to confirm through the ideas of the representative Confucian scholars of the time that the elements of Qi Xue(齊學) were all contained in the thoughts of the Han Confucianism. From the perspective of Hu-Shi, the Han Confucianism was a religion of childish and superstitious character, however, the new Confucianism of the Han Dynasty enjoyed the status of national religion in the Han Empire, and it played a role in institutional readjustment in the area of education and bureaucracy. Hu’s study on the Han Confucianism is significant in that it clearly highlighted the existence of Confucianism as a religious tradition in ancient China. Hu himself took an extremely critical approach to the Han Confucianism, giving no positive meaning to it. In the realm of Chinese philosophy, Hu’s study on the Han Confucianism has never been noted. But from the point of view of Chinese religious history, Hu’s study on the Han Confucianism is an important achievement that can not be neglected.
      번역하기

      It is well known that Hu-Shi(胡適) gradually abandoned the term ‘history of philosophy’ and began to use the term ‘intellectual hoistory’ from the late 1920s. I don’t think it is just a shift from philosophy to thoughts. It is more appropr...

      It is well known that Hu-Shi(胡適) gradually abandoned the term ‘history of philosophy’ and began to use the term ‘intellectual hoistory’ from the late 1920s. I don’t think it is just a shift from philosophy to thoughts. It is more appropriate to say that Hu’s view has expanded from history of philosophy to cultural history or the history of religions. Hu’s study of the Han Confucianism is the result of exploring the theoretical aspects and social role of the Confucianism as a religion. Hu-Shi did not declare that the thoughts of the Han Confucianism were the development of the main streams of Qi Xue(齊學). However, we were able to confirm through the ideas of the representative Confucian scholars of the time that the elements of Qi Xue(齊學) were all contained in the thoughts of the Han Confucianism. From the perspective of Hu-Shi, the Han Confucianism was a religion of childish and superstitious character, however, the new Confucianism of the Han Dynasty enjoyed the status of national religion in the Han Empire, and it played a role in institutional readjustment in the area of education and bureaucracy. Hu’s study on the Han Confucianism is significant in that it clearly highlighted the existence of Confucianism as a religious tradition in ancient China. Hu himself took an extremely critical approach to the Han Confucianism, giving no positive meaning to it. In the realm of Chinese philosophy, Hu’s study on the Han Confucianism has never been noted. But from the point of view of Chinese religious history, Hu’s study on the Han Confucianism is an important achievement that can not be neglected.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김용천, "후한 유교국가의 성립" 동과서 2011

      2 葛兆光, "사상사를 어떻게 쓸 것인가" 영남대학교출판부 2008

      3 福永光司, "道敎思想史硏究" 岩波書店 1987

      4 酒井忠夫, "道敎Ⅰ: 道敎とは何か" 平河出版社 1983

      5 李姸承, "董仲舒―음양의 조절론자" 대동문화연구원 12 (12): 449-480, 2007

      6 胡適, "胡適學術文集" 中華書局 1991

      7 胡適, "胡適學術文集" 中華書局 1991

      8 胡適, "胡適學術文集" 中華書局 1991

      9 胡適, "胡適口述自傳" 安徽敎育出版社 2003

      10 胡適, "胡適口述自傳" 安徽敎育出版社 2003

      1 김용천, "후한 유교국가의 성립" 동과서 2011

      2 葛兆光, "사상사를 어떻게 쓸 것인가" 영남대학교출판부 2008

      3 福永光司, "道敎思想史硏究" 岩波書店 1987

      4 酒井忠夫, "道敎Ⅰ: 道敎とは何か" 平河出版社 1983

      5 李姸承, "董仲舒―음양의 조절론자" 대동문화연구원 12 (12): 449-480, 2007

      6 胡適, "胡適學術文集" 中華書局 1991

      7 胡適, "胡適學術文集" 中華書局 1991

      8 胡適, "胡適學術文集" 中華書局 1991

      9 胡適, "胡適口述自傳" 安徽敎育出版社 2003

      10 胡適, "胡適口述自傳" 安徽敎育出版社 2003

      11 胡適, "胡適全集 第8卷" 安徽敎育出版社 2003

      12 胡適, "胡適全集 第8卷" 安徽敎育出版社 2003

      13 胡適, "胡適全集 第8卷" 安徽敎育出版社 2003

      14 胡適, "胡適全集 第8卷" 安徽敎育出版社 2003

      15 胡適, "胡適全集 第8卷" 安徽敎育出版社 2003

      16 胡適, "胡適全集 第3卷" 安徽敎育出版社 2003

      17 胡適, "胡適全集 第8卷" 安徽敎育出版社 2003

      18 董德福, "胡適‘反孔非儒’評議" (3) : 1995

      19 樓宇烈, "現代學術史上的胡適" 三聯書店 1993

      20 "漢書" 宏業書局 1984

      21 勞思光, "新編中國哲學史 (二)" 三民書局 1990

      22 王汎森, "從哲學史到思想史: 胡適的英文≪中國思想史大綱≫草稿" (3) : 2017

      23 胡適, "四十自述" 安徽敎育出版社 2003

      24 "史記" 宏業書局 1983

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-06-24 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> JOURNAL OF CHINESE STUDIES KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.31 0.31 0.31
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.3 0.28 0.684 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼