루쉰과 나쓰메 소세키(夏目漱石)의 근대 주체 탐색― ‘나래주의(拿來主義)’와 ‘자기본위(自己本位)’의 ‘주체 세우기(立人)’ 양상 = A Research for Lu Xun(魯迅) & Natsume Soseki(夏目漱石)’s Exploration of the Modern Subjects

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this paper is to examine the pattern of establishing a modern subject through Natsume Soseki, a intellectual of late modern country, and Lu Xun, a intellectual of premodern country. To this end, this paper discusses the aspects of Soseki’s ‘Self-Hood(自己本位)’ and Lu Xun’s ‘Nalaizhuyi(拿來主義)’. The Soseki’s ‘Self-Hood’ is not a selfish individualism but a ‘moral individualism’, and The Lu Xun’s ‘Nalaizhuyi’ emphasizes subjective activeness in the acceptance of foreign cultures. Through the ‘Self-Hood’, Soseki reconsiders the value of traditions forgotten in the process of modernization and emphasizes the reflective introduction of foreign cultures. The ‘Self-Hood’ and The ‘Nalaizhuyi’ emphasize the subject’s activeness and emphasize the value of freedom in which the subject’s activeness is expressed. For both Soseki and Lu Xun, freedom for the exercise of personality is the basic condition of modern subjects. Another reason why both emphasize the exercise of personality and freedom is the witness of the individual’s anxiety and solitude faced in the process of modernization. China and Japan only differed in the pace of modernization, and both were forced to throw away familiar ones and accept unfamiliar ones. This is due to the fact that the modernization of the two countries did not proceed voluntarily, but was counter-forced by external forces.
On the other hand, since freedom for the exercise of personality may infringe the freedom of others, both require an ethic of self-check. This emphasis on the morality of literary art is also a key mechanism for the completion of both literary forms and contents. Both literary forms and contents, similar to self-centeredness, have a strong social color. They hoped that exercising their personality enthusiastically would ultimately break down the barriers between people, and in fact their literature had the effect of healing individualistic loneliness and anxiety faced by modern Japanese and Chinese through the exercise of personality.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 게오르그 루카치, "영혼과 형식" 심설당 1988

2 정선태, "심연을 탐사하는 고래의 눈" 소명출판 2003

3 루쉰, "무덤" 선학사 2001

4 히야마 히사오, "동양적 근대의 창출 ― 루쉰과 소세키" 소명출판 2000

5 안영희, "동아시아의 근대와 근대 지식인 - 나쓰메 소세키, 루쉰, 이광수 -" 일본어문학회 (71) : 355-380, 2015

6 나쓰메 소세키, "나츠메 소세키 문학예술론" 소명출판 2004

7 나쓰메 소세키, "나의 개인주의 외" 책세상 2011

8 전수진, "나쓰메 소세키(夏目漱石)와 노신(魯迅)의 근대문화 수용에 대한 의식 비교" 한국일본근대학회 (56) : 199-212, 2017

9 陈占彪, "鲁迅與夏目漱石写作的心理背景" 25 (25): 2005

10 传俊, "鲁迅和夏目漱石的個人主义" (8) : 2007

11 魯迅, "鲁迅全集 1, 3, 4, 5, 6권" 人民文学出版社 1981

12 伊藤虎丸, "鲁迅, 创造社與日本文学" 北京大学出版社 2005

13 苏文倩, "觉醒, 挣扎與追求- 鲁迅與夏目漱石笔下的知识分子形象比较" (1) : 1991

14 由同来, "略论≪文艺的哲学基礎≫对≪摩罗诗力说≫文学观之影响" (2) : 2004