The objective of this study was to analyze the research trends in action learning in Korea over the past 20 years to gain insight into the current state of research in this field and to suggest potential avenues for future action learning research. Th...
The objective of this study was to analyze the research trends in action learning in Korea over the past 20 years to gain insight into the current state of research in this field and to suggest potential avenues for future action learning research. This study analyzed action learning papers listed as KCI in the Research Information Service (RISS) and the Korean Citation Index (KCI).
Subsequently, the years of publication, research methodology, field of study, and research purposes were investigated. Additionally, the research subjects and outcome factors of the action learning were analyzed. The field of action learning in Korea has a relatively short history of academic research, commencing in 2001. However, following the keynote lecture delivered by action learning researcher Michael Marquardt at the HRD Society in 2004 and the subsequent establishment of the Korea Action Learning Association in 2005, there has been a notable resurgence of interest in this area of study. Initially, numerous studies on research methods were conducted to introduce the concept of action learning through literature research and to explore the applicability of action learning to other fields. However, over time, there has been a shift in focus toward studies that analyzed program development, application, and effectiveness. The advent of action learning initially occurred within the context of corporate training and education, subsequently being applied to the domain of higher education. The researchers confirmed that studies utilizing action learning as a methodology outnumber those focused on theoretical research of action learning. Additionally, there has been an increase in studies applying and verifying the effectiveness of action learning programs, and many studies have explored the potential applicability of action learning to various fields. Most of the research participants were college and graduate students, and an active research program in higher education was also underway. The results indicated that action learning had a positive impact on several key performance indicators. At the individual level, it enhanced problem-solving capabilities and fostered self-directed learning. At the organizational level, it improved job performance, and communication and collaboration within teams. Considering the findings, further research is warranted to advance the theoretical understanding of action learning. It is recommended that modeling studies be conducted to examine the competencies of learning coaches in applying action learning to diverse fields and contexts, with the aim of enhancing the competencies of action learning instructors.