A Principled Explanation on Double Object and Dative Constructions

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to suggest a principled explanatory mechanism for the puzzling interaction of the complements DP1 and DP2 within VP in the Double Object Construction (DOC) and Dative Construction (DC). For this, the multiple Spec-VP and the multiple Theta (θ)-Agree of V inherited from v such as V1CAUSE and V2Have in DOC are posited with respect to Aoun and Li’s (1989) DOC to DC Transformation (T) approach. To support this postulation, Distributed Morphology (DM)– based Harley’s (2002) double object verb decomposition is adopted and slightly changed in the vein of the causative light verb v . And Kayne’s (1984) binary branching as well as Larson’s (1988) and Aoun and Li’s (1989) passivization are adopted and Aoun and Li’s (1989) Hybrid Analysis is a bit revised. As a result, the semantic relation and the structural (asymmetric) c-command relation between DP1 and DP2 in DOC and DC are solved. Also the inaccessibility of wh-extraction on DP2 in DOC and the accessibility of wh-extraction on DP1 in DC are explained.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Pesetsky, D., "Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades , paths and Categories" MIT 1995

2 Chomsky, N., "Three Factors in the Design of language" 36 : 1-22, 2005

3 Chomsky, N., "The View from Building 20" MIT Press 1-52, 1993

4 Harley, H., "The View from Building 20" MIT Press 111-176, 1993

5 Oba, Y, "The Double Object Construction and Thematization/Extraction" 22 (22): 56-81, 2005

6 Chomsky, N., "The Biolinguistic Program: Where does it stand today" MIT 2008

7 Kayne, R., "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" MIT 1994

8 Aoun, J., "Scope and Constituency" 20 : 141-172, 1989

9 Aoun, J., "Quantifier Types" 16 : 623-636, 1985

10 Grohmann, K., "Prolific Peripheries" John Benjamins 2003

11 Chomsky, N., "Problems of Projection: Extensions" MIT 2014

12 Chomsky, N., "Problems of Projection" 130 : 33-49, 2013

13 Larson, R., "On the Double Object Construction" 19 : 335-391, 1988

14 Chomsky, N., "On Phases" MIT 2005

15 Hiraiwa, K., "Multiple Agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint in Japanese" MIT 67-80, 2000

16 Hornstein, N., "Movement and Control" 30 : 60-96, 1999

17 Radford, A., "Minimalist Syntax" Cambridge University Press 2004

18 Chomsky, N., "Minimalist Inquiries: the Framework" MIT 1998

19 Harley, H., "Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2" 29-68, 2002

20 Lee, J., "Ditransitive Structures and (Anti-) Locality" Harvard University 2004

21 Chomsky, N., "Derivation by Phase" 18 : 1-44, 1999

22 Kayne, R., "Connectedness and Binary Branching" Foris 1984

23 Chomsky, N., "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy" MIT 2001

24 Boeckx, C., "Bare Syntax" Oxford University Press 2008

25 Chomsky, N., "Approaching UG from Below" MIT 2006

26 김희태, "A Principled Explanation for Verb-Movements: V-v-to-T and T-to-C" 현대문법학회 (98) : 71-95, 2018

27 Barss, A, "A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects" 17 : 347-354, 1986

28 MacDonald, J., "A Movement Analysis of Some Double Object Constructions" 276-285, 2015

29 심재영, "<φ, φ>-less Labeling" 언어교육원 54 (54): 23-39, 2018