It is not easy for the learners to obtain the helpful information about the task. If we can find some specific information and inquire the methods to deal with the cues, we are able to offer a lot of information to them now under a training program. T...
It is not easy for the learners to obtain the helpful information about the task. If we can find some specific information and inquire the methods to deal with the cues, we are able to offer a lot of information to them now under a training program. Therefore, we need to offer such information directly and definitely to distinguish the differences of task, so that the learners can correct the errors. The purpose of this study is the understanding of the differences of the effects on the improvement of the learners’ observational training, which comes from the observational training. The subjects were the 80 college male students who took the gymnasium classes for 12 weeks.The two types of contents of the class are the ‘neck spring’ (NS) and the ‘head spring’ (HS). The pretest is done after administering the same contents for the purpose of both understanding conception and detecting errors in the contents analysis.Thus, after subject’s observational training, t-test was utilized to determine the differences of the learner’s detecting ability. The rates of detecting errors of the experimental group is outstandingly higher than those of the control group on both classes: NS and HS. After the experimental group was trained for the conceptional understanding of the study subject, pretest and posttest were given to both groups. The results of this study indicate that the observation training had highly positive impact on the development of the learner’s detecting ability.