The Uneven Integration of Polish Manufacturing Industries into the European Single Market = The Uneven Integration of Polish Manufacturing Industries into the European Single Market

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The paper aims to show the uneven process of integration of Polish manufacturing into the Single Market due to differentiational changes in competitiveness across industries (third digit level of NACE Rev. 1.1 classification) in 1996-2001. It starts with a discussion on the nature and measurement of competitiveness. Since this notion is derived from that of competition as rivalry, the effects and factors of competition are the focus. Section 2 describes the overall picture of changes in competitiveness of Polish manufacturing measured by changes in market shares and relative labour productivity. Changes in relative unit export values as a measure of changes in quality of products produced in Poland are considered. Section 3 analyses the usefulness of various measures of changes in the competitiveness of Polish manufacturing in depicting the uneven process of integration of industries into the Single Market. In the last section the winners and losers in the process of integration of Polish manufacturing into the Single Market and the factors determining uneven integration are analysed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Haug A, "evidence for theUS Journal of Business and Economics Statistics" 97-101, 1990

2 Levin, A, "Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties" 108 : 1-24, 2002

3 Hansen, "Time Series Implications of Present ValueBudget Balance and of Martingale Models of Consumption and Taxes" Westview Press 121-162, 1991

4 and Walsh, "Theory andApplications to US Federal Budget and Current Account Deficits Journal of Money" 206-223, 1991

5 Marinheiro, C, "The Sustainability of Portuguese Fiscal Policy in Historical Perspective" 33 : 155-179, 2006

6 Bohn, H., "The Sustainability of Fiscal Policy in the United States" 1446 : 2005

7 Bernoth, K, "The Determinants of the Yield Differential in the EU Government Bond Market" 4465 : 2004

8 Bohn, H., "The Behaviour of US Public Debt and Deficits" 113 (113): 949-963, 1998

9 IM, K, "Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels" 115 : 53-74, 2003

10 Banerjee A, "Some Cautions on the use of Panel" 7 : 322-340, 2004

11 Pedroni P, "Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to PPP" 1997

12 Rush, "Is the budget deficit too large?" eco (eco): 429-445, 1991

13 Canzoneri, M, "Is the Price Level determined by the Needs of Fiscal Solvency?" 91 (91): 1221-1238, 2001

14 Bravo, A, "Intertemporal Sustainability of Fiscal Policies: some tests for European countries" 18 : 517-528, 2002

15 Arghyrou, M, "Government Solvency: revisiting some EMU Countries" 2005

16 Ahmed, S, "Government Budget Deficits and Trade Deficits. Are Present Value Constraints in Long Term Data?" 36 : 351-374, 1995

17 Afonso, A, "Fiscal Sustainability: the unpleasant European Case" 61 (61): 19-44, 2005

18 Artis, M, "Fiscal Solvency and Fiscal Forecasting in Europe" 1998

19 Corsetti, "Evidence from OECD Countries Journal of the Japanese and InternationalEconomies" 354-380, 1991

20 Beetsma, R, "Does Monetary Unification lead to excessive Debt Accumulation?" 74 : 299-325, 1999

21 Pedroni, P., "Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors" 61 : 653-670, 1999