From “welfare approach” to “gender-mainstreaming”, the theoretical discourse on women illustrates gender as a core element in international development. Urging the international political bodies to systematically incorporate gender perspective...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13845531
서울 : 경희대학교 평화복지대학원, 2015
학위논문(석사) -- 경희대학교 평화복지대학원 , 국제평화전공 , 2015. 8
2015
영어
gender ; gender-mainstreaming ; oda ; international development ; korea ; japan ; sweden
322-A 판사항(22)
서울
70 p. : 삽화 ; 26 cm
지도교수: 홍기준
경희대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
참고문헌: p. 63-70
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
From “welfare approach” to “gender-mainstreaming”, the theoretical discourse on women illustrates gender as a core element in international development. Urging the international political bodies to systematically incorporate gender perspective...
From “welfare approach” to “gender-mainstreaming”, the theoretical discourse on women illustrates gender as a core element in international development. Urging the international political bodies to systematically incorporate gender perspectives in all policies and programs, this study particularly focuses on the concept of “gender-mainstreaming”, a new approach that gained highlight during the Fourth World Conference on Women in 1995. Specifically, the study seeks to measure the current status of Korean gender-mainstreaming in ODA by comparing and identifying lessons from the experienced two countries and also the peer OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) member states, Sweden and Japan. In order to compare the three countries’ gender-mainstreaming in ODA, the study had examined how social, economic and aid organizational structure influenced on allocation of aid in social-infrastructure & service for gender equality.
The study concludes that gender equality is a cross cutting issue closely related to fundamental human rights and democracy, and the analysis showed social and cultural background, gender budgeting and organizational structure can effect one’s country’s investment on gender-mainstreaming in ODA. While Korea showed high aid concentration particularly on “population and reproductive health”, and additionally did not thoroughly implement gender elements within the most highly invested sector, Sweden on the other hand turned out to have high and equal distribution within all social-infrastructure & service sectors including education, health, population & reproductive health, water, government & civil society and others. Lastly, Japan had similar patterns with that of Korea, but definitely had higher budget and relatively even aid allocation for gender equality projects in social-infrastructure & service. The study realizes the relatively short history in international development, society’s demand for traditional gender roles and the rapid economic growth of Korea exist as obstacles for the country’s contribution for gender-mainstreaming in ODA. However, the study suggest as to truly contribute to the achievement of democracy and human rights through gender-mainstreaming in ODA, the planning and implementation of gender projects should be in a long-term perspective reflecting the social, economic and organizational changes of the donor country.
목차 (Table of Contents)