RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      합성곱신경망을 이용한 안전문화 수준 분류

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106574352

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate whether an artificial intelligence technique can be successfully applied to safety culture survey data classification. Background: Without help of artificial intelligence technique, classifying saf...

      Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate whether an artificial intelligence technique can be successfully applied to safety culture survey data classification.

      Background: Without help of artificial intelligence technique, classifying safety culture level from safety culture scores collected from a large-scale survey would require a lot of experts" time and effort.

      Method: Two convolution layers and 1 pooling layer was used as the middle layer of the artificial neural network to design a classifier for safety culture level. 1045 safety culture survey data collected from power plant workers used to train and validate the classifier.

      Results: After 40 epochs" training the classifier approached near 95% precision in classifying "safe" and "need to be improved" classes of safety culture level. Precision, recall and F1-score for the test data set showed over 95% of accuracy performance.

      Conclusion: An artificial intelligence technique using such as convolution neural network can help classification of safety culture survey data.

      Application: The safety culture level classifier using deeper neural network and big survey data might improve the performance and might substitute expert interviewers for safety culture evaluation.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Method
      • 3. Results and Conclusions
      • References
      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Method
      • 3. Results and Conclusions
      • References
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이동하, "Suggestions for More Reliable Measurement of Korean Nuclear Power Industry Safety Culture" 대한인간공학회 35 (35): 75-84, 2016

      2 Muniz, B. F., "Safety culture: analysis and the causal relationships between its key dimensions" 38 : 627-641, 2007

      3 이용희, "Safety Culture, A New Challenge to Human Factors Engineering for 21st Century" 대한인간공학회 35 (35): 473-492, 2016

      4 Olive, C., "Relationship of safety culture and process safety" 130 : 133-140, 2006

      5 Hale, A., "Occupational Injury: Risk Prevention, and Intervention" Taylor & Francis 129-166, 1998

      6 김대호, "Measuring Safety Culture to Promote Aviation Safety Culture" 대한인간공학회 35 (35): 111-123, 2016

      7 Reason, J., "Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents" Ashgate 1997

      8 Stanton, N. A., "Human Factors in the Design and Evaluation of Central Control Room Operations" CRC Press 2010

      9 Geron, A., "Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems" O'Leilly 2017

      10 이용희, "Current Status and Issues of Nuclear Safety Culture" 대한인간공학회 35 (35): 247-261, 2016

      1 이동하, "Suggestions for More Reliable Measurement of Korean Nuclear Power Industry Safety Culture" 대한인간공학회 35 (35): 75-84, 2016

      2 Muniz, B. F., "Safety culture: analysis and the causal relationships between its key dimensions" 38 : 627-641, 2007

      3 이용희, "Safety Culture, A New Challenge to Human Factors Engineering for 21st Century" 대한인간공학회 35 (35): 473-492, 2016

      4 Olive, C., "Relationship of safety culture and process safety" 130 : 133-140, 2006

      5 Hale, A., "Occupational Injury: Risk Prevention, and Intervention" Taylor & Francis 129-166, 1998

      6 김대호, "Measuring Safety Culture to Promote Aviation Safety Culture" 대한인간공학회 35 (35): 111-123, 2016

      7 Reason, J., "Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents" Ashgate 1997

      8 Stanton, N. A., "Human Factors in the Design and Evaluation of Central Control Room Operations" CRC Press 2010

      9 Geron, A., "Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems" O'Leilly 2017

      10 이용희, "Current Status and Issues of Nuclear Safety Culture" 대한인간공학회 35 (35): 247-261, 2016

      11 Pidgeon, N. F, "Aviation Psychology in Practice" Aldershot 21-43, 1994

      12 Ball, P. W., "Approaches to Safety Culture Enhancement" British Nuclear Fuels, Ltd 1998

      13 Health and Safety Executive (HSE), "A Review of the Safety Culture and Safety Climate Literature for the Development of the Safety Culture Toolkit" HSE Books 2005

      14 김범수, "A Methodology for Establishment of Safety Culture in Industry through Global Company Practices" 대한인간공학회 35 (35): 85-95, 2016

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.1 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.15 0.19 0.306 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼