가사비송절차에서의 참가와 수계 = Intervention and Succession in the Family Non-Litigation Procedure

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the procedure of family non-litigation, the concerned party formally involved in the procedure(formal concerned party) can be different from the person subjected to the effect of trial(practical concerned party). In family non-litigation cases with no other party, in particular, the claimant initiates the procedure and submits trial materials, but the effects of trial may be on the relevant person. In such a case, it is needed to provide interrogation and hearing opportunities to the person subjected to the effects of trial or directly influenced by the legal status of trial outcomes and guarantee the person's status of getting involved in the procedure and engage in procedural acts. Even in family non-litigation cases with the other party, it is needed to guarantee the person that will have his or her status or interests under the direct influence of trial outcomes of a chance to intervene in the procedure in advance.
It is the common view that the suspension of the procedure will not be recognized in the family non-litigation procedure as the procedure proceeds mainly by the procedural speed and authority. The other party's intervention should be guaranteed in the examination of evidence by the concerned party's interrogation and request. In family non-litigation cases with the other party, in particular, examination of evidence despite the suspension of the procedure is not allowed as it happens to ignore the successor's right to intervention and opportunity to make a statement. Just because the suspension of the procedure is not recognized in the family non-litigation procedure, it does not mean that there can be no succession of the procedure.
The present study reviewed the intervention and succession regulations in the family non-litigation procedure in the current Family Litigation Act and its general revision bill from the perspective of procedural guarantee for the concerned and interested parties and drew its own conclusions.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

,

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정선주, "한국의 가사비송절차 - 2015년도 법원행정처 가사소송법 전부 개정 법률안을 중심으로 －" 한국민사소송법학회 19 (19): 309-343, 2015

2 윤진수, "친족상속법강의" 박영사 2018

3 박동섭, "친족상속법" 박영사 2013

4 송덕수, "친족상속법" 박영사 2017

5 김주수, "친족 상속법-가족법-" 법문사 2019

6 박동섭, "주석 가사소송법" 박영사 2004

7 김원태, "일본에서의 가사비송사건 절차의 규율" 한국민사소송법학회 16 (16): 361-390, 2012

8 이시윤, "신민사소송법" 박영사 2020

9 김원태, "성년후견 등 심판절차에 관한 가사소송법 정비 방안에 대한 관견" 한국재산법학회 28 (28): 265-302, 2011

10 법원행정처, "법원실무제요 가사(Ⅰ)" 법원행정처 2010

11 김홍엽, "민사소송법" 박영사 2020

12 한충수, "민사소송법" 박영사 2018

13 신영호, "가족법강의" 세창출판사 2018

14 金元泰, "가사소송에서의 절차보장에 관한 연구" 釜山大學校 大學院 1995

15 김원태, "가사소송법 전부개정법률안의 특징과 주요 내용" 법조협회 66 (66): 286-340, 2017

16 김원태, "가사소송법 전부개정과 실질적 절차보장" 한국민사소송법학회 21 (21): 171-221, 2017

17 김원태, "가사소송법 개정의 방향과 과제" 사법발전재단 1 (1): 3-37, 2014

18 김용욱, "가사소송법" 고시연구사 1995

19 민유숙, "가사비송절차의 문제점과 개선방향" 한국가족법학회 18 (18): 321-354, 2004

20 김원태, "가사비송절차에서의 절차보장" 충북대학교 법학연구소 24 (24): 2013

21 德田和幸, "非訟事件手續家事事件手續における當事者等の手續保障" 83 (83): 2011

22 鈴木忠一, "非訟事件の旣判力" 弘文堂 1961

23 金子修, "逐條解說 家事事件手續法" 商事法務 2013

24 山口幸雄, "講座.實務家事審判法1" 日本評論社 1989

25 麥田雄鄕, "講座 實務家事事件手續法上" 日本加除出版株式會社 2017

26 윤진수, "美國 家庭法院의 現況과 改善 論議" 한국가족법학회 22 (22): 151-204, 2008

27 秋武憲一, "槪說 家事事件手續法" 靑林書院 2012

28 鈴木忠一, "新.實務民事訴訟講座8" 1981

29 飯塚重男, "實務民事訴訟講座7" 日本評論社 1969

30 佐上善和, "家事事件手續法 Ⅰ(家事審判,家事調停)" 信山社 2017

31 梶村太市, "家事事件手續法" 有斐閣 2005

32 松川正穀, "人事訴訟法家事事件手續法, 新基本法コメンタール" 日本評論社 (225) : 2013

33 金子修, "一問一答 家事事件手續法" 商事法務 2012

34 법원행정처 가사소송법개정위원회, "2015 가사소송법 개정자료집"