RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      세계경제공황 전후 ‘영제국경제회의’와 조선의 對 ‘영제국권’ 무역 = ‘British Empire Economic Conference’ and the Trade of Chosun with ‘British Empire Territories’ before and after the World Economy Crisis

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82395518

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      British Empire had established the ‘special tariff policy’ basically for the trade between Britain and its colonies. Although Britain stood for free trade policies, protective trade policies had been adopted in its colonies. Each colony of British Empire had tariff autonomy and ‘preferential tariff policies’ had been in effect between most of its colonies. Before the world economy crisis, Britain and its colonial governments had consulted on the issue of preferential tariff at the ‘British Empire Economic Conference’, which showed differences in positions. In September, 1930, after the economy crisis, the ‘British Empire Economic Conference’ was held in London. At that time several proposals for the preferential tariff rule insisted by each colony were not agreed with Britain, either. The ‘British Empire Economic Conference’ had been held for one month since July 21st, 1932 in Ottawa, Canada. At that conference, preferential measurements between colonies were more reinforced. After then, as each nation raised its tariff continuously, ‘tariff war’ followed fiercely. The preferential tariff between Britain and its colonies affected rarely on the trade of Chosun with ‘British Empire Territories’. It could be translated that Chosun had separated from the world economy further than any other colonies due to the complete subordination as a colony of Japan. After annexation, Japan adopted ‘special tariff policies’ in Chosun. However, since the ‘tariff assimilation policy’ was implemented in 1920, Britain’s influence over Chosun trade had been decreased rapidly. Under the world economy crisis, Japan enforced aggressive polices to promote export, which got some results. However, after the Sino-Japanese war, the trade of Chosun overly weighted toward the Yen block and the trade with ‘British Empire Territories’ declined sharply.
      번역하기

      British Empire had established the ‘special tariff policy’ basically for the trade between Britain and its colonies. Although Britain stood for free trade policies, protective trade policies had been adopted in its colonies. Each colony of British...

      British Empire had established the ‘special tariff policy’ basically for the trade between Britain and its colonies. Although Britain stood for free trade policies, protective trade policies had been adopted in its colonies. Each colony of British Empire had tariff autonomy and ‘preferential tariff policies’ had been in effect between most of its colonies. Before the world economy crisis, Britain and its colonial governments had consulted on the issue of preferential tariff at the ‘British Empire Economic Conference’, which showed differences in positions. In September, 1930, after the economy crisis, the ‘British Empire Economic Conference’ was held in London. At that time several proposals for the preferential tariff rule insisted by each colony were not agreed with Britain, either. The ‘British Empire Economic Conference’ had been held for one month since July 21st, 1932 in Ottawa, Canada. At that conference, preferential measurements between colonies were more reinforced. After then, as each nation raised its tariff continuously, ‘tariff war’ followed fiercely. The preferential tariff between Britain and its colonies affected rarely on the trade of Chosun with ‘British Empire Territories’. It could be translated that Chosun had separated from the world economy further than any other colonies due to the complete subordination as a colony of Japan. After annexation, Japan adopted ‘special tariff policies’ in Chosun. However, since the ‘tariff assimilation policy’ was implemented in 1920, Britain’s influence over Chosun trade had been decreased rapidly. Under the world economy crisis, Japan enforced aggressive polices to promote export, which got some results. However, after the Sino-Japanese war, the trade of Chosun overly weighted toward the Yen block and the trade with ‘British Empire Territories’ declined sharply.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 세계경제공황 이전 영제국의 관세정책과 ‘영제국경제회의’
      • 3. 세계경제공황 이후 ‘영제국경제회의’와 ‘관세전쟁’
      • 4. 조선의 대 ‘영제국권’ 무역의 실상
      • 5. 맺음말
      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 세계경제공황 이전 영제국의 관세정책과 ‘영제국경제회의’
      • 3. 세계경제공황 이후 ‘영제국경제회의’와 ‘관세전쟁’
      • 4. 조선의 대 ‘영제국권’ 무역의 실상
      • 5. 맺음말
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 구대열, "한국국제관계사연구 1 `in일제시기 한반도의 국제관계" 역사비평사 138-, 1991

      2 송규진, "중일전쟁 시기 조선의 대 제삼국 무역정책과 무역실상" 민족문화연구원 (43) : 203-241, 2005

      3 헨리 펠링, "영국현대사 1885~1955" 탐구당 1981

      4 사이먼 C. 스미스, "역사·쟁점·사료 영국제국주의, 1750-1970" 동문선 7-, 2001

      5 송규진, "식민지조선 관세정책의 비교사적 분석" 아세아문제연구소 46 (46): 135-169, 2003

      6 "세관장회의" 朝鮮總督府 156-, 1934

      7 김강민, "세계사 제2차 세계대전" 중원문화 1986

      8 김택현, "세계사 제1차 세계대전" 중원문화 1985

      9 송규진, "문호개방 이후 대 서양무역이 조선경제에 끼친 영향" 한국사학회 (81) : 229-267, 2006

      10 小林行昌, "關稅經濟論" 嚴松堂書店 79-107, 1937

      1 구대열, "한국국제관계사연구 1 `in일제시기 한반도의 국제관계" 역사비평사 138-, 1991

      2 송규진, "중일전쟁 시기 조선의 대 제삼국 무역정책과 무역실상" 민족문화연구원 (43) : 203-241, 2005

      3 헨리 펠링, "영국현대사 1885~1955" 탐구당 1981

      4 사이먼 C. 스미스, "역사·쟁점·사료 영국제국주의, 1750-1970" 동문선 7-, 2001

      5 송규진, "식민지조선 관세정책의 비교사적 분석" 아세아문제연구소 46 (46): 135-169, 2003

      6 "세관장회의" 朝鮮總督府 156-, 1934

      7 김강민, "세계사 제2차 세계대전" 중원문화 1986

      8 김택현, "세계사 제1차 세계대전" 중원문화 1985

      9 송규진, "문호개방 이후 대 서양무역이 조선경제에 끼친 영향" 한국사학회 (81) : 229-267, 2006

      10 小林行昌, "關稅經濟論" 嚴松堂書店 79-107, 1937

      11 新田直藏, "關稅戰上の日本" 大同書院 1930

      12 松井淸, "近代日本貿易史" 3 : 96-, 1963

      13 "英國의 關稅障壁과 列國의 關係" 啓明文化社 145-, 1992

      14 "第三國貿易の振興について" 朝鮮貿易協會 30 : 1-, 1938

      15 小林丑三郞, "植民地財政論" 明治大學出版部 221-222, 1913

      16 矢內原忠雄, "植民及植民政策" 有斐閣 529-, 1941

      17 "東亞經濟調査局"

      18 송규진, "日帝下의 朝鮮貿易硏究" 高麗大學校 民族文化硏究院 2001

      19 關谷九郞, "對外貿易好望品としての朝鮮物産" 鮮貿易協會 44 : 3-, 1939

      20 朴壽伊, "國際貿易史" 박영사

      21 李瑄根, "全英帝國會議와 印度情勢" 啓明文化社 385-, 1992

      22 川合彰武, "ブロツク經濟崩壞の兆 國際貿易主流の一變化"

      23 外務省調査部, "オタワ英帝國經濟會議の考察" 日本國際協會 1935

      24 Tony Michell, "“British Companies and British Commerce with Korea 1609~ 1984;Potential Unfulfilled" The Anglo-American Studies Institute 92 : 1986

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-12-06 학술지명변경 한글명 : 호서사학 -> 역사와 담론
      외국어명 : HO-SUH SAHAK -> HISTORY AND DISCOURSE(Journal of Historycal Review)
      KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-09-29 학술지등록 한글명 : 호서사학
      외국어명 : HO-SUH SAHAK
      KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.56 0.56 0.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.46 0.46 0.953 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼