Aurora Battery의 영재판별 가능성 탐색 = A Study on Aurora Battery's Possibility for Identifying Gifted Students

국문 초록 (Abstract)

입학사정관제도의 도입과 같이 지적 잠재력이나 성장가능성을 중요시하는 교육 패러다임은 지능 이론의 새로운 방향과 맥락을 같이 한다. 전통적 지능 측정의 한계로 최근 여러 연구에서는 학교 교육 없이 각자의 분야에서 탁월한 업적을 보인 사람들의 성공요인을 탐색하고 측정하고자 하는 시도들이 나타나고 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 성공지능이론과 성공지능을 기반으로 하여 수행되어져 왔던 이전의 연구들을 살펴보고, 다양한 인간의 능력과 잠재성을 판별하기 위해 전통적 지능 측정방법의 대안 모델로 개발 중인 Aurora Battery의 구성요소를 설명하여 영재판별도구로서의 가능성을 탐색하였다. 기존의 전통적 지능검사와 다른 Aurora Battery의 영재판별도구로서의 가능성은 다음과 같다. 첫째, Aurora Battery는 학생의 강점과 약점이 반영된 전반적인 지능프로필을 제공해 준다. 둘째, 실제 정보를 처리하기 위해 작용하는 각 지능의 역할에 대해 평가할 수 있다. 셋째, Aurora Battery는 다양한 문화배경에서 유용하게 적용될 수 있는 매우 포괄적인 평가방법이다. 넷째, 영역과 유형간의 능력들을 평가하기 위한 분명한 지침을 제공하여 영재판별 시 교육현장에서 융통성 있게 사용 할 수 있다. 그러나 Aurora Battery는 현재 개발 중인 판별도구로 정확한 타당도와 신뢰도 측정이 이루어지지 않았다는 제한점을 가진다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Educational paradigms, which value intelligent potential and possibility of growth like the admission officer system, are in line with the new directions of the theory of intelligence. Because of the limits of traditional intelligence-centered measures, there have been attempts in many recent studies to explore and assess the key elements of successful people who made excellent achievements in their own fields without receiving school education. Thus, this study identified various human abilities and potential, analyzed “Aurora Battery” which is being developed as an alternative model for conventional intelligence measures and examined its possibility as a method to measure gifted students. The characteristics that make “Aurora Battery” different from traditional IQ tests are as follows. First, “Aurora Battery” provides a general intelligence profile reflective of students' strengths and weaknesses. Second, it helps carry out research and evaluation of individual ability's role in achieving high performance and surviving fierce competition. Third, it offers ways to execute sophisticated skills necessary for fields of education and specialized areas. Fourth, it is a very comprehensive evaluation method which is useful and applicable in different cultures. However, “Aurora Battery” has not yet completed and the evaluation method has limitation, since accurate assessment has not been conducted for validity and reliability.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 요약
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. Aurora Battery의 개발 근거
• Ⅲ. The Aurora Battery
• Ⅳ. 논의 및 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강영심, "성공지능과 전통지능의 고등학생 학업성취도에 대한 예측력 비교" 한국교육심리학회 16 (16): 83-103, 2002

2 Sternberg, R. J., "Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized" Cambridge University Press 2003

3 Sternberg, R. J., "Thinking styles inventory – For Students about Themselves" CT 1993

4 Sternberg, R. J., "Thinking Styles" Cambridge University Press 2002

5 Herrick, M. J., "The validity of practical intelligence measures as construct in the context of academic and vocational program in school" University of Minnesota Press 2001

6 Sternberg, R. J., "The theory of successful intelligence" 3 : 292-316, 1999

7 Sternberg, R. J., "The relationship between academic and practical intelligence : A case study in Kenya" 29 : 401-418, 2001

8 McClelland, D. C., "Testing for competence rather than for intelligence" 28 : 1-14, 1973

9 Sternberg, R. J., "Teaching for thinking" American Psychological Association 1996

10 Sternberg, R. J., "Teaching for successful intelligence raises school achievement" 79 (79): 667-669, 1998

11 Sternberg, R. J., "Successful intelligence" Simon & Schuster 1996

12 Sternberg, R. J., "Successful Intelligence" Plume 1997

13 Grigorenko, E. L., "Styles of thinking, abilities, and academic performance" 63 : 295-312, 1997

14 김정휘, "Sternberg의 성공지능(SI)고찰 : IQ, EQ를 넘어선 지적 재능을 갖춘 사람을 찾아내는 방안 탐색" 26 : 1-26, 2004

15 Sternberg, R. J., "Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test"

16 Grigorenko, E. L., "Something new in the garden : Assessing creativity in academic domains" 50 (50): 295-307, 2008

17 Kagan, S., "Multiple intelligences: the complete MI book" Resources for Teachers 1998

18 Kaufman, A. S., "Intelligence tests and gifted assessment: What are the positives?" 8 : 154-159, 1986

19 Sternberg, R. J., "Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom" 49 (49): 607-627, 1985

20 Schroth, S. T., "Identifying gifted students : Educators beliefs regarding various processes and procedures" 32 (32): 155-179, 2008

21 Sternberg, R. J., "Identification, instruction, and assessment of gifted children : A construct validation of the triarchic model" 40 : 129-137, 1996

22 Sternberg, R. J., "Identification of the gifted in the new millennium : Two assessments for ability testing and for the broad identification of gifted students" 56 : 1069-1079, 2006

23 Sternberg, R. J., "How to Develop student creativity" Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 1996

24 Perrone, P. A., "Handbook of gifted education" Allyn & Bacon 321-327, 1991

25 Ericsson, K. A., "Giftedness viewed from the expert-performance perspective" 28 (28): 287-311, 2005

26 Gardner, H., "Frames of Mind" Basic Book Inc 1983

27 Mayer, J. D., "Emotional development and emotional intelligence: implications for educators" Basic Books 3-31, 1997

28 Sternberg, R. J., "Dynamic testing" Cambridge University Press 2002

29 Gottfredson, L. S., "Dissecting practical intelligence" Its 2003

30 Chart, H., "Critical issues and practices in gifted education" Prufrock 281-301, 2008

31 Lubart, T. I., "Creativity tasks in four domains"

32 Sternberg, R. J., "Conceptions of giftedness" Cambridge University Press 1984

33 Bracken, B. A., "Behavioral identification and assessment of gifted and talented students" 24 : 112-122, 2006

34 Hedlund, J., "Assessing practical intelligence in business school admissions : A supplement to the graduate management admissions test" 16 (16): 101-127, 2006

35 Grigorenko, E. L., "Analytical creative and practical intelligence as predictors of self-reported adaptive functioning : A case study in Russia" 29 : 57-72, 2001

36 교육인적자원부, "2008학년도 이후 대입제도 개선안"