RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한(韓),중(中) 단오 유래설과 관련 세시 = Annual Cyclical Rites Related to Origin Theories of Korean and Chinese Dano

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101720298

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In 2005, the Gangneung Danoje Festival, Korea’s Important Intangible Culture Heritage Item No. 13 was proclaimed as a UNESCO Masterpiece of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity. Around the time of preparation for its registration as a UNESCO...

      In 2005, the Gangneung Danoje Festival, Korea’s Important Intangible Culture Heritage Item No. 13 was proclaimed as a UNESCO Masterpiece of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity. Around the time of preparation for its registration as a UNESCO Masterpiece, the Chinese held the view that Dano (May 5th in the lunisolar calendar) has roots in China. However, the Korean Dano festival cannot be held to be of Chinese origin despite its many similarities to the Chinese Dano festival. There may be connections between the two in that the Chinese characters for Dano were borrowed and that the Korean cyclical rite of Dano is much the same as that of Chinese Dano, but it cannot be held that Korean Dano originated in China. It is true that Korea and China share historical cultural characteristics of older times, but before the Chinese letters for Dano were used, there existed a Korean ritual called Suritnal. Though there are a lot of similarities between the Korean Dano Festival and the Chinese Dano Festival, they are different from each other. The Korean Dano rite was originally agricultural in nature, emphasizing the worship of heaven and ancestry, while the Chinese Dano was a rite for the dead, focusing on comforting departed souls. It was rather a memorial service than the agricultural ritual. Of course, the Chinese also worshiped gods through the Dano rite. In fact, in all the 24 divisions of the year, the Chinese worshiped gods. Originally in China, the historical divisions of the year reinforced the principle that Nature, including heaven, should be obeyed. At every division of the year, various gods including heaven were worshiped. It is therefore thought that origin stories centering on specific historical figures were formed and added later on. Yet such origin stories were also valued, which reflected the Chinese public feeling of emphasizing nationalistic spirit, patriotism, and the spirit of national defense. More than anything else, the origin theory of Korean Dano differs from that of Chinese Dano. In addition, many Chinese annual cyclical rites have origin stories related to historical figures. Besides the division of Dano, the divisions of Hansik(Day for Beginning to Have Cold Food), Chilseok(July 7th on the lunisolar calendar), and Dongji(winter solstice) are respectively related with the following figures: Gaejachu, Gyeonu and Jiknyeo, and the son of Gonggongssi. Most of the 24 divisions of the year have origin stories. Korea has its own legend about the origin of Sondol, a male wind god, but still many Korean legends borrow from Chinese origin stories. Though the origin stories of Hansik, Chilseok, and Dongji stem from China, they are familiar to Koreans. The origin story of Chilseok results from a phenomenon of the stars, and that of Hansik comes from history. These origin stories have become part of Korea’s yearly division stories Korean records of annual cyclical rites include Chinese annual cyclical rites introduced to Korea along with other things from Chinese culture. The recorded explanations of Chinese annual cyclical rites were applied to Korean annual cyclical rites and were newly interpreted and recorded. Native Korean annual cyclical rites were described along with those records. Some records of such annual cyclical rites are so confusing that it is still a question whether Dano was native to Korea or was introduced from China. However, in general, the annual cyclical rites of the court were from China. Some of the court``s annual cyclical rites could have been transformed into those of the ordinary people, yet on the whole, both kinds of annual cyclical rites remained different from each other. Still others were mingled, so their origins cannot be identified. In conclusion, the Korean Dano annual cyclical rite borrowed just its name and ideology from China. Its concrete contents are composed of things Korean.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼