『개벽』과 1920년대 초반 문학담론의 형성 = 『Gaebyŏk』 and the Formation of 1920s' Literature Discourse

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In 1920s, when 『Gaebyŏk』 appeared, 'Modernization discourses' was mostly driven by religions. This also means that religious utopianism played a critical role as a psychological mechanism in a socio-psychological dimension. In 1920s, what 『Gaebyŏk』 demonstrated was that this religious utopianism could be united with diverse political ideologies.
Chŏndogyo's young intellectuals who led 『Gaebyŏk』 wanted to show that Chŏndogyo's creed had potential for leading and comprehending ‘general intellectual discourses’. In 1920s, 『Gaebyŏk』 became a representative discourse space which mediated diverse 'enligntenment discourses of intellectual subject’ including literature, so that what they wanted could be realized.
These discussions imply that 1920's korean literature could worked as nothing other than ‘enlightenment knowledge’ in discourse space. So, it does not seem true and plausible that ‘Donginji(literary coterie magazine)’ literature could strip of all features of enlightenment and formed a self-sufficient sphere of aesthetic autonomy. Like other ideologies such as socialism and anarchism that was ‘recognized’ by korean intellectualls through the window of Japan in late 1910’s, art for art's sake also existed in ‘enlightenment’ discourse space which 『Gaebyŏk』 unfolded and outstretched.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 들어가며
• 2. 『개벽』과 천도교의 이념/노선 문제
• 3. 1920년대 초반 문학담론의 양상-동인지 문학의 성격 문제
• 참고문헌
• 영문초록

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "한국근대정치사상사연구" 역사비평사 1992

2 "한국 잡지개관 및 호별 목차집" 1973

3 "천도교청년회팔십년사" 2000

4 "윤치호 일기" 역사비평사 2001

5 "민족과 국가 그리고 ‘문화’" 2집 : 213-244, 2000

6 "미적 근대성과 동인지 문단" 소명출판 2003

7 "<개벽>의 종교적 이상주의와 근대문학의 사상화" 145-160, 2005.6.18

8 "1920년대 초반 문학의 상황과 의미, 1920년대 동인지 문학과 근대성 연구" 깊은샘 181-212, 2000

9 "1920년대 초기 시의 이념과 미학" 소명출판 2004

10 "1920년대 문학과 ‘개벽’의 위상" 2001