橋梁景觀의 形態別 特性 評價 및 視覺的 認知度에 關한 類似性 分析 = Pattern evaluation and similarity analysis against visual perceptions of bridgescape

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Recently, the concern of the aspect of esthetic value that the shape of a bridge itself has and the aspect of landscape from harmony with surrounding environment. This is different tendency with before that emphasize the aspect of functional and structural safety. Because a bridge is important structure to determine urban landscape and one of the landmark, so it needs to evaluate bridge's design and bridgescape.
The aim of this study is to investigate the present state of the whole country's bridge and to evaluate the visual perception against bridgescape employing semantic differential method through 16 adjectives. And it also analyzes the preference of day and night landscape and the remarkable landmark out of 8 bridges to represent Pusan through Delphi technique, and analyze the similarity on the assessment of bridge's shape, color, light, harmony with the environment which are each bridge's bridgescape composition employing multidimensional scaling method.
The major findings of this paper are as follows;
First, it is the best factor to determine bridgescape that is the harmony with environment and the shape of bridge. So the result of analysis the evaluation on the visual perception according to the shape of bridge through 16 adjectives, the most unique bridge is arch bridge, the most common bridge is steel box girder bridge, the most familiar bridge is suspension bridge, the most unfamiliar bridge is rigid-frame bridge. Cable-stayed girder bridge give us the most active sense, prestressed concrete slab bridge give us the most static sense. The most rhythmical bridge is rigid-frame bridge, the most monotonous bridge is prestressed concrete slab bridge, and cable-stayed girder bridge give us the strongest impression and the most cheerful feelings.
The factor analysis summarize from 16 adjectives to 3 factors. the first factor is commonness which is organized by boring, unbeautiful, unfashionable, monotonous, uninteresting, static, common, simple, depressed, the second factor is disharmony which is composited by reluctant, bad, uneasy, discontinuous, weak, discomfortable, the third factor is unfamiliarity.
Second, the bridge which represent Pusan recognized which has the splendid day and night landscape and landmark. Gwangan Bridge is evaluated as chosen the best bridge which has landscape and is the supremacy landmark to represent Pusan. But the result on the assessment for each bridgescape compositions shows interesting findings. Pusan Bridge and Shinho Bridge is bound to the same group as an arch bridge in the bridge's shape aspect and red color which are made of steel in the bridge's color aspect. And Pusan Bridge is similar to Gupo Bridge in the bridge's illumination aspect. The Second Nakdong Bridge and the Third Nakdong Bridge are the lowest grade in all items.
Gwangan Bridge is the best bridge and cannot compare with others in the day and night landscape and landmark, as well as bridgescape composition which include bridge's shape, color, illumination and harmony with environment. On the other hand, in spite of Yongdo Bridge's symbol, the assessment shows a bad valuation on the old bridge by a low grade at bridgescape composition

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 第1章 序論 = 1
• 第1節 硏究背景 및 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究範圍 및 方法 = 4
• 第2章 理論的 考察 및 先行硏究 = 5
• 第1節 景觀에 對한 理論的 考察 = 5
• 1. 景觀의 槪念 및 類型 = 5
• 2. 社會間接資本施設의 景觀的 特性 = 17
• 3. 橋梁景觀의 槪念 및 構成要素 = 19
• 第2節 景觀 및 橋梁景觀에 關한 先行硏究 = 23
• 1. 景觀에 關한 先行硏究 = 23
• 2. 橋梁景觀에 關한 先行硏究 = 32
• 第3章 釜山市 橋梁 現況 및 特性 = 40
• 第1節 橋梁의 特徵 및 類型 = 40
• 1. 橋梁의 定義 및 構成 = 40
• 2. 橋梁의 種類 = 42
• 第2節 橋梁 現況 = 50
• 1. 全國의 橋梁 = 50
• 2. 釜山市 橋梁現況 = 57
• 3. 計劃中인 橋梁 = 64
• 第4章 橋梁景觀에 關한 專門家 認識 分析 = 70
• 第1節 說問槪要 및 調査對象 = 70
• 1. 設問槪要 = 70
• 2. 調査對象 = 72
• 第2節 橋梁景觀에 關한 專門家 認識 = 74
• 1. 橋梁景觀에 關한 一般的 認識 評價 = 74
• 2. 橋梁의 形態別 評價 = 83
• 3. 橋梁景觀의 視覺的·情緖的 特性 評價 및 分析 = 89
• 第3節 小結 = 97
• 第5章 釜山市 橋梁景觀에 關한 選好度 및 視覺的 認知度에 關한 類似性 分析 = 99
• 第1節 釜山地域 橋梁景觀에 關한 選好度 = 99
• 1. 釜山地域 橋梁景觀에 對한 選好度 分析 = 99
• 第2節 釜山地域 橋梁景觀에 關한 視覺的 認知度 類似性 分析 = 107
• 1. 多次元尺度法(MDS:Multidimentional Scaling) = 107
• 2. 多次元尺度法을 利用한 橋梁景觀 構成要素別 類似性 分析 = 109
• 第3節 小結 = 115
• 第6章 結論 = 117
• ■ 參考文獻 = 121
• ■ 附錄(設問調査紙) = 137
• Abstract = 146
• [ 表目次 ] = 33
• <表 2-1> 橋梁景觀에 關한 先行硏究 = 33
• <表 3-1> 全國 橋梁現況 = 50
• <表 3-2> 設計荷重·延長別 現況 = 51
• <表 3-3> 建設時期別 現況 = 51
• <表 3-4> 全國의 斜張橋, 懸垂橋 現況 = 52
• <表 3-5> 漢江 橋梁現況 = 54
• <表 3-6> 釜山廣域市 橋梁現況 = 57
• <表 4-1> 設問內容 構成 = 71
• <表 4-2> 應答者에 關한 一般的 事項 = 72
• <表 4-3> 橋梁景觀의 主要 決定要所 = 74
• <表 4-4> 世界의 橋梁 中 景觀이 가장 뛰어난 橋梁 = 76
• <表 4-5> 全國 橋梁 中 景觀이 가장 뛰어난 橋梁 = 80
• <表 4-6> 鋼箱型橋와 PSC橋가 주는 느낌 = 84
• <表 4-7> PC Slab橋와 Rahmen橋가 주는 느낌 = 85
• <表 4-8> 懸垂橋와 斜張橋가 주는 느낌 = 86
• <表 4-9> 鋼箱板型橋와 Arch橋가 주는 느낌 = 87
• <表 4-10> 全體 橋梁에 對한 視覺的·情緖的 評價 = 90
• <表 4-11> 視覺的·情緖的 特性 要因들의 固有값 = 90
• <表 4-12> 視覺的·情緖的 特性에 對한 要因 積載量 = 91
• <表 4-13> varimax 回轉 後 各 要因의 固有값 = 91
• <表 4-14> 視覺的·情緖的 特性 變數의 共通性(Communality) = 92
• <表 4-15> 橋梁景觀에 對한 視覺的·情緖的 特徵의 標準化 要因係數 = 92
• <表 4-16> 橋梁의 形態別 視覺的·情緖的 特性에 對한 要因 點數 = 93
• <表 5-1> 釜山市 橋梁의 晝間景觀 順位 = 99
• <表 5-2> 釜山市 橋梁의 夜間景觀 順位 = 100
• <表 5-3> 釜山市 橋梁의 Landmark 役割 = 101
• <表 5-4> 橋梁景觀 構成要素別 評價 = 103
• <表 5-5> 廣安大橋 橋梁景觀 評價에 對한 分散分析 = 104
• <表 5-6> 廣安大橋 橋梁景觀 評價에 對한 多變量 統計量 = 105
• <表 5-7> 釜山大橋 橋梁景觀 評價에 對한 分散分析 = 106
• <表 5-8> 釜山大橋 橋梁景觀 評價에 對한 多辯量 統計量 = 106
• <表 5-9> MTV(最優法) 推定 結果 = 110
• [그림目次] = 8
• <그림 2-1> 外國의 景觀管理 事例 Ⅰ = 8
• <그림 2-2> 外國의 景觀管理 事例 Ⅱ = 9
• <그림 2-3> 外國의 景觀管理 事例 Ⅲ = 9
• <그림 2-4> 外國의 景觀管理 事例 Ⅳ = 9
• <그림 3-1> 橋梁의 構造 = 41
• <그림 3-2> Girder橋 = 44
• <그림 3-3> Arch橋 = 45
• <그림 3-4> Truss橋 = 46
• <그림 3-5> Rahmen橋 = 47
• <그림 3-6> 斜張橋 = 48
• <그림 3-7> 懸垂橋 = 49
• <그림 3-8> 全國 橋梁現況 = 53
• <그림 3-9> 漢江 橋梁現況 = 55
• <그림 3-10> 釜山市 橋梁現況 Ⅰ = 61
• <그림 3-11> 釜山市 橋梁現況 Ⅱ = 62
• <그림 3-12> 釜山市 橋梁現況 Ⅲ = 63
• <그림 3-13> 計劃 中인 釜山市 橋梁 = 69
• <그림 4-1> 專門家가 選好하는 世界的인 橋梁景觀 = 78
• <그림 4-2> 專門家가 選好하는 全國 橋梁景觀 = 81
• <그림 4-3> 橋梁이 주는 느낌 Ⅰ = 86
• <그림 4-4> 橋梁이 주는 느낌 Ⅱ = 87
• <그림 4-5> 橋梁의 形態別 平凡함과 生疎함에 對한 要因點數 = 94
• <그림 4-6> 橋梁의 形態別 生疎함과 不調和에 對한 要因點數 = 94
• <그림 4-7> 橋梁의 形態別 平凡함과 不調和에 對한 要因點數 = 95
• <그림 4-8> 橋梁의 形態別 視覺的·情緖的 特性에 對한 要因點數 = 95
• <그림 5-1> 橋梁의 形態에 關한 MDPREF = 112
• <그림 5-2> 橋梁의 色彩에 關한 MDPREF = 112
• <그림 5-3> 橋梁의 夜間照明에 關한 MDPREF = 113
• <그림 5-4> 橋梁의 周邊環境과의 調和에 關한 MDPREF = 113
• <그림 5-5> 全體橋梁景觀에 關한 MDPREF = 114