초등과학영재학생의 과학창의성과 다중지능의 관계 - 생명 영역을 중심으로 - = The Relationship between Scientific Creativity of Science-gifted Elementary Students and Multiple Intelligence- Focusing on the Subject of Biology -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aims to analyse the relationship between multiple intelligence and scientific creativity of science- gifted elementary students focusing on the subject of biology. For this, 37 science-gifted fifth-graders in the Science-Gifted Education Center at an Office of Education conducted a multiple intelligence test. In addition, researchers collected science-gifted students’ results of scientific creativity activity at the botanical garden field trip. The main findings from this study are as follows: First, strong intelligence was logical-mathematical intelligence for gifted students, and weak intelligence was found to be naturalistic intelligence for them. Second, there was no significant correlation in the relationship between multiple intelligence and scientific creativity of science-gifted students. Third, as a result of independent two sample t-test for each intelligence and scientific creativity scores divided into the upper and lower groups, only verbal-linguistic intelligence statistically differed significantly at the level of p<.05 (t=2.13, df=35, p=0.04). Fourth, as a result of conducting a two-way analysis to see if there were any interaction effects, verbal-linguistic and visual-spatial, logical-mathematical and visual- spatial, logical-mathematical and bodily-kinesthetic, and visual-spatial and musical-rhythmic intelligence all showed significant values at the level of p<.05 level in interaction effects on originality element comprising scientific creativity. Fifth, an analysis of students with high naturalistic intelligence showed that their scores of scientific creativity tasks conducted at the botanical garden field trip were all lower. Based on the results of this study, this study discussed the implications of scientific creativity learning linking multiple intelligence in primary science education and gifted education.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이유림, "한국어 학습자의 어휘 습득과 어휘 표현력에 영향을 미치는 변인 연구" 한국어의미학회 49 : 163-187, 2015

2 이수현, "초등학교 영재 아동의 다중지능과 과흥분성의 관계 연구" 고려대학교 교육대학원 2009

3 진주현, "초등수학영재의 다중지능과 수학적 능력구성 요소와의 관계" 서울교육대학교 대학원 2015

4 김민주, "초등과학영재학생의 발표에 대한 인식 및 발표의 자발성과 과학창의성의 관계 분석" 한국초등과학교육학회 38 (38): 331-344, 2019

5 백성혜, "초등과학 영재학급 학생들과 일반 학생의 인지적 특성 비교 분석" 한국과학교육학회 26 (26): 307-316, 2006

6 류성림, "초등 수학영재와 학부모의 다중지능에 관한 비교 분석" 한국수학교육학회 24 (24): 807-830, 2010

7 여상인, "초․중등 수학․과학․정보 영재의 다중지능 비교" 4 (4): 1-8, 2010

8 박병기, "창의성과 지능의 관계구조" 14 (14): 235-261, 2000

9 문용린, "지능과 교육" 학지사 2003

10 홍성윤, "중다지능이론과 교수-학습 방법" (13) : 167-188, 1998

11 최인수, "유아용 창의성 측정도구에 관한 고찰" 20 (20): 139-166, 2000

12 노명완, "유아언어교육론" 동문사 1995

13 신숙희, "어머니의 언어형태와 유아의 언어·사고능력 및 창의성과의 관계" 梨花女子大學校 敎育大學院 1987

14 백종남, "발달장애학생용 다중지능 측정도구 개발을 위한 기초연구: 국내 다중지능 측정도구 개발 연구 동향 분석" 한국지체.중복.건강장애교육학회 53 (53): 307-334, 2010

15 문용린, "다중지능이론에 기초한 진로교육 가능성 탐색" 한국진로교육학회 17 (17): 1-19, 2004

16 임채성, "과학창의성 평가 공식의 개발과 적용" 한국초등과학교육학회 33 (33): 242-257, 2014

17 박종원, "과학적 창의성 모델의 제안-인지적 측면을 중심으로-" 한국과학교육학회 24 (24): 375-386, 2004

18 윤경미, "과학영재, 인문사회영재, 일반 중학생의 다중지능 특성 비교" 한국청소년학회 15 (15): 287-313, 2008

19 성진숙, "과학에서의 창의적 문제해결력에 영향을 미치는 제 변수 분석: 확산적 사고, 과학 지식, 내.외적 동기, 성격 특성 및 가정 환경" 한국열린교육학회 11 (11): 219-237, 2003

20 송성수, "과학사의 사례를 활용한 과학자의 창의성에 관한 탐색적 연구: 다윈, 에디슨, 아인슈타인을 중심으로" 과학교육연구소 52 (52): 227-236, 2013

21 박미진, "과학․수학 영재의 다중지능, 자기조절학습능력 및 개인성향의 차이" 한국영재학회 23 (23): 697-713, 2013

22 Mumford, M. D., "Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research" 15 (15): 107-120, 2003

23 Jauk, E., "The relationship between intelligence and creativity : New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection" 41 (41): 212-221, 2013

24 Korfiatis, K. J., "The living world in the curriculum : Ecology, an essential part of biology learning" 46 (46): 125-127, 2012

25 Hargreaves, D. J., "Sex roles in divergent thinking" 47 (47): 25-32, 1977

26 Preckel, F., "Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students : An investigation of threshold theory" 40 (40): 159-170, 2006

27 Gardner, H. E., "Multiple intelligences: New horizons in theory and practice" Basic Books 2008

28 Han, K. S., "Multiple creativities? Investigating domain-specificity of creativity in young children" 46 (46): 98-109, 2002

29 Olsen, K. D., "How education can lead the way to an integral society : A proven model for doing so already exists" 60 (60): 287-293, 2004

30 Baer, J., "How divergent thinking tests mislead us:Are the Torrance Tests still relevant in the 21st century? The division 10 debate" 5 (5): 309-313, 2011

31 Sternberg, R. J., "Handbook of human creativity" Cambridge University Press 1998

32 Mayer, R. E., "Handbook of creativity" Cambridge University Press 1999

33 Sternberg, R. J., "Handbook of creativity" Cambridge University Press 251-272, 1999

34 Harrington, R. G., "Effects of verbal self instruction on creative play in preschool aged children" 18 (18): 143-144, 1984

35 Wilson, C., "Effective approaches to connect with nature" Department of Conservation 2011

36 Torrance, E., "Education and the creative potential" University of Minnesota Press 1963

37 Runco, M. A., "Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential" 24 (24): 66-75, 2012

38 Runco, M. A., "Creativity: From potential to realization" American Psychological Association 21-30, 2004

39 Weisberg, R. W., "Creativity : Beyond the myth of genius" WH Freeman 1993

40 Singer, D. G., "Children’s pastimes and play in sixteen nations : Is free-play declining?" 1 (1): 283-312, 2009

41 Treffinger, D. J., "Assessing creativity: A guide for educators" The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented 2002

42 Kim, J., "A study on development of modelling for field trips of biology learning" 28 (28): 129-135, 2000

43 Hu, W., "A scientific creativity test for secondary school students" 24 (24): 389-403, 2002