RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      국민참여재판의 개시요건에 대한 비판적 고찰 = A Critical Study for OpeningRequirements of The Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Our criminal justice system introduced a new system that is called "The Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial" in 2008. The citizens' participation trial as new trial is testing now. That test operation period is over in 2012 and one year later, we h...

      Our criminal justice system introduced a new system that is called "The Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial" in 2008. The citizens' participation trial as new trial is testing now. That test operation period is over in 2012 and one year later, we had to decide whether to abolish this new trial system after reviewing test results for five years.
      However The prospects for this participation trial system are not bright. Because the judicial citizens' participation trial come face to face with a crisis right now. Especially, more than all, it is a typical example of this crisis that the implementation rate of participation trial is very low. The cause of this crisis is as in the following.
      1. low rates of application
      2. high rates of withdrawal
      3. high rates of exclusion
      Therefore, one year later, to prevent from being abolished this new trial system, we need to come up with measures to vitalize the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial. In line with this thinking, something to notice
      here is the opening requirements of the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial.
      Under current law, to initiate criminal proceedings as the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial, the following requirements must be satisfied.
      1. the case should be belong to the subject range of application in Article 5
      2. the accused should submit an application including expressions that he want to receive the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial
      3. the exclusion reasons provided in Article 9 should be no
      From among these opening requirements, the second requirement is largely responsible for critical situations that the implementation rate of participation trial is very low.
      Thus, to overcome this kind of situation, we need to (1) scale down the subject range of application of Article 3 under current law, (2) carry out the obligatory citizens' participation trial within the demagnified range of application.
      In short, something needed to vitalize the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial is the selection and concentration through the reduction of application case and the compulsory opening of the citizens' participation trial than an increase in quantity by the expansion of application case.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서설
      • Ⅱ. 국민참여재판의 개시요건에 대한 고찰
      • Ⅲ. 적극적 개시요건을 둘러싼 쟁점
      • Ⅳ. 소극적 개시요건을 둘러싼 쟁점
      • Ⅴ. 결론 -‘국민참여’의 본래 취지에 부합하는 개시요건이 필요
      • Ⅰ. 서설
      • Ⅱ. 국민참여재판의 개시요건에 대한 고찰
      • Ⅲ. 적극적 개시요건을 둘러싼 쟁점
      • Ⅳ. 소극적 개시요건을 둘러싼 쟁점
      • Ⅴ. 결론 -‘국민참여’의 본래 취지에 부합하는 개시요건이 필요
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼