RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Clinical Use of Procalcitonin in the Diagnosis of Sepsis: Evaluation of PCT–qSOFA

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107235628

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening medical condition, and the diagnosis of sepsis should be conducted rapidly and accurately. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a combination of procalcitonin (PCT) levels and...

      Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening medical condition, and the diagnosis of sepsis should be conducted rapidly and accurately. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a combination of procalcitonin (PCT) levels and quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), namely PCT–qSOFA, for the diagnosis of sepsis.
      Methods: A total of 204 patients were grouped according to the results of blood culture and systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria (≥ 2/4) into the bacterial sepsis group (N = 67), the blood culture-negative sepsis group (N = 37), the blood culture-positive group without corresponding clinical symptoms or signs of sepsis (N = 35), and the control group without evidence of sepsis (N = 65). The diagnostic performance of PCT–qSOFA was assessed using the post-test probability analysis.
      Results: Compared with qSOFA, PCT–qSOFA demonstrated improved post-test probability (from 0.772 to 0.884) and a positive likelihood ratio (from 1.59 to 3.55) when it was applied to all subjects, including those in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, this improvement in diagnostic performance was not observed when PCT–qSOFA was applied to patients outside the ICU.
      Conclusions: The combined use of PCT and qSOFA can help clinicians identify patients with sepsis, including those in an ICU setting

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Vincent JL, "qSOFA does not replace SIRS in the definition of sepsis" 20 : 210-, 2016

      2 Michael Meisner, "Update on Procalcitonin Measurements" 대한진단검사의학회 34 (34): 263-273, 2014

      3 Singer M, "The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock(Sepsis-3)" 315 : 801-810, 2016

      4 Kaukonen KM, "Systemic infiammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis" 372 : 1629-1638, 2015

      5 Dellinger RP, "Surviving sepsis campaign : international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock : 2012" 41 : 580-637, 2013

      6 Salomão R, "Sepsis: evolving concepts and challenges" 52 : e8595-, 2019

      7 Simpson SQ, "SIRS in the time of Sepsis-3" 153 : 34-38, 2018

      8 Spoto S, "Procalcitonin and MR-proadrenomedullin combination with SOFA and qSOFA scores for sepsis diagnosis and prognosis : a diagnostic algorithm" 50 : 44-52, 2018

      9 Cortés-Puch I, "Opening the debate on the new sepsis definition change is not necessarily progress: revision of the sepsis definition should be based on new scientific insights" 194 : 16-18, 2016

      10 Cortés-Puch I, "Opening the debate on the new sepsis definition change is not necessarily progress : revision of the sepsis definition should be based on new scientific insights" 194 : 16-18, 2016

      1 Vincent JL, "qSOFA does not replace SIRS in the definition of sepsis" 20 : 210-, 2016

      2 Michael Meisner, "Update on Procalcitonin Measurements" 대한진단검사의학회 34 (34): 263-273, 2014

      3 Singer M, "The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock(Sepsis-3)" 315 : 801-810, 2016

      4 Kaukonen KM, "Systemic infiammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis" 372 : 1629-1638, 2015

      5 Dellinger RP, "Surviving sepsis campaign : international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock : 2012" 41 : 580-637, 2013

      6 Salomão R, "Sepsis: evolving concepts and challenges" 52 : e8595-, 2019

      7 Simpson SQ, "SIRS in the time of Sepsis-3" 153 : 34-38, 2018

      8 Spoto S, "Procalcitonin and MR-proadrenomedullin combination with SOFA and qSOFA scores for sepsis diagnosis and prognosis : a diagnostic algorithm" 50 : 44-52, 2018

      9 Cortés-Puch I, "Opening the debate on the new sepsis definition change is not necessarily progress: revision of the sepsis definition should be based on new scientific insights" 194 : 16-18, 2016

      10 Cortés-Puch I, "Opening the debate on the new sepsis definition change is not necessarily progress : revision of the sepsis definition should be based on new scientific insights" 194 : 16-18, 2016

      11 Horan TC, "CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care–associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting" 36 : 309-332, 2008

      12 Faix JD, "Biomarkers of sepsis" 50 : 23-36, 2013

      13 Singh M, "Bedside procalcitonin and acute care" 4 : 233-237, 2014

      14 "American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis" 20 : 864-874, 1992

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.16 0.16 0.11
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.09 0.306 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼