This paper aims to investigate the restructuring of 'malida' and syntactic characteristics of 'malida-1', 'malida-2'.
'Malida-1' sentence has basically 'NP1i NP2i-' structure. So its sentence can change negative sentence transformation and combine ...
This paper aims to investigate the restructuring of 'malida' and syntactic characteristics of 'malida-1', 'malida-2'.
'Malida-1' sentence has basically 'NP1i NP2i-' structure. So its sentence can change negative sentence transformation and combine the tense pre-ending, conjunction ending.
'Malida-2' sentence don't describe sameness or property between NP₁ and NP₂. 'Malida-2' is combined with the preceeding complemet '-n'. 'Malida-2' means that show speaker's attitude about a proposition of a stentence and not be concerned in construction of the proposition's contents. 'Malida-2 sentence has no restriction of subject but has restriction of negative sentence transformation, combination of tense pre-ending and conjunction ending. 'Malida' is restructuralized 'malida-2' because of semantic weakness of 'ida' and the completion or definiteness of the ending of '-n'.