RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      A novel pancreaticogastrostomy method using only two transpancreatic sutures = early postoperative surgical results compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100534823

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) using two transpancreatic sutures with a buttress method through an anterior gastrostomy (PGt), and compare these results with our previous experience with pancreaticojejunostom...

      Purpose: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) using two transpancreatic sutures with a buttress method through an anterior gastrostomy (PGt), and compare these results with our previous experience with pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) including the dunking and duct to mucosa methods after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
      Methods: In this study, 171 patients who had undergone PD between January 2005 and April 2013 were classified into three groups according to the method of the pancreaticoenteric anastomosis: dunking PJ (PJu group; n = 67, 39.1%), duct to mucosa PJ (PJm group; n = 41, 23.9%), and PGt (PGt group; n = 63, 36.8%). We retrospectively analyzed patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and surgical results.
      Results: Both groups had comparable demographics and pathology, and there were no significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, or postoperative hospital stay. Within the two groups, morbidities occurred in 49 cases (10.7%), and were not significantly different between the two groups, excepting postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The PGt group had a lower rate of POPF (18/63, 28.6%) than the PJu and PJm groups (21/67, 31.3% and 19/41, 46.3%; P = 0.048), especially in terms of grades B and C POPF (4/63 [6.3%] in the PGt group vs. 7/67 [10.4%] in the PJu group and 9/41 [22.0%] in the PJm group, P = 0.049).
      Conclusion: The PGt method showed feasible outcomes for POPF and had advantages over dunking PJ and duct to mucosa PJ with respect to immediate postoperative results. PGt may be a promising technique for pancreaticoenteric anastomosis after PD.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • INTRODUCTION
      • METHODS
      • RESULTS
      • DISCUSSION
      • REFERENCES
      • INTRODUCTION
      • METHODS
      • RESULTS
      • DISCUSSION
      • REFERENCES
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Kim JH., "Which method should we select for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy?" 33 : 326-332, 2009

      2 Fernandez-Cruz L., "Which is the best technique for pancreaticoenteric reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy?. A critical analysis" 41 : 761-766, 2011

      3 Yang SH., "The methods of reconstruction of pancreatic digestive continuity after pancreaticoduodenectomy : a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" 35 : 2290-2297, 2011

      4 Kleespies A., "The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis" 393 : 459-471, 2008

      5 Figueras J., "Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy" 100 : 1597-1605, 2013

      6 Bassi C., "Postoperative pancreatic fistula : an international study group(ISGPF)definition" 138 : 8-13, 2005

      7 Topal B., "Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours : a multicentre randomised trial" 14 : 655-662, 2013

      8 He T., "Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy : a systematic review and meta-analysis" 30 : 56-69, 2013

      9 Fernandez-Cruz L, "Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy" 18 : 762-768, 2011

      10 Zhu F., "Modified technique of pancreaticogastrostomy for soft pancreas with two continuous hemstitch sutures : a single-center prospective study" 17 : 1306-1311, 2013

      1 Kim JH., "Which method should we select for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy?" 33 : 326-332, 2009

      2 Fernandez-Cruz L., "Which is the best technique for pancreaticoenteric reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy?. A critical analysis" 41 : 761-766, 2011

      3 Yang SH., "The methods of reconstruction of pancreatic digestive continuity after pancreaticoduodenectomy : a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" 35 : 2290-2297, 2011

      4 Kleespies A., "The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis" 393 : 459-471, 2008

      5 Figueras J., "Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy" 100 : 1597-1605, 2013

      6 Bassi C., "Postoperative pancreatic fistula : an international study group(ISGPF)definition" 138 : 8-13, 2005

      7 Topal B., "Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours : a multicentre randomised trial" 14 : 655-662, 2013

      8 He T., "Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy : a systematic review and meta-analysis" 30 : 56-69, 2013

      9 Fernandez-Cruz L, "Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy" 18 : 762-768, 2011

      10 Zhu F., "Modified technique of pancreaticogastrostomy for soft pancreas with two continuous hemstitch sutures : a single-center prospective study" 17 : 1306-1311, 2013

      11 Klein F., "Matchedpair analysis of postoperative morbidity and mortality for pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy using mattress sutures in soft pancreatic tissue remnants" 11 : 89-95, 2012

      12 Nakao A., "Is pancreaticogastrostomy safer than pancreaticojejunostomy?" 13 : 202-206, 2006

      13 Z'graggen K., "How to do a safe pancreatic anastomosis" 9 : 733-737, 2002

      14 Kennedy EP, "Dunking pancrea ticojejunostomy versus duct-to-mucosa anastomosis" J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci

      15 Wente MN., "Delayed gastric emptying(DGE)after pancreatic surgery : a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery(ISGPS)" 142 : 761-768, 2007

      16 Butturini G., "Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy : the problem of current definitions" 13 : 207-211, 2006

      17 Jang JY., "Comparison of the functional outcome after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy : pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy" 26 : 366-371, 2002

      18 Fang WL., "Comparison between pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy" 106 : 717-727, 2007

      19 Tae Ho Hong, "An easy and secure pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: transpancreatic suture with a buttress method through an anterior gastrotomy" 대한외과학회 81 (81): 332-338, 2011

      20 Winter JM., "1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer : a single-institution experience" 10 : 1199-1210, 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-11-12 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한외과학회지 -> Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-12-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of The Korean Surgical Society -> Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.39 0.21 0.97
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.73 0.56 0.328 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼