제1차 세계대전 종전 후 개조론의 확산과 한국 지식인 = The Spread of the Argument of Reconstruction after World War I and Korean Elites

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Paris peace conference, which was to handle the postwar problems of World War I, was held with the anticipation for independence of the colonized, including Chosun. The conference based its fundamentals on Woodrow Wilson’s fourteen points, which had included the self-determination of peoples. Wilson’s points were where the colonized found a way of light in their road to independence. Wilson’s declaration of self-determination was a political promise that had been made by the Allied Nations during the war for their own needs, so the colonized nations were highly expecting from the Paris conference.
However, President Wilson’s fourteen points were only to counter the reality where the Soviet Russia, which had succeeded in communist revolution, was earning moral righteousness through measures such as self-determination. It was a symbolic gesture to display morality through democracy and self-determination on a war that was regarded highly immoral. The points were exceedingly ambiguous and had a long distance from the reality of the Great Powers. Wilson, who declared the fourteen points, was the highest sovereignty of the United States, a member of the wartime allied nations. President Wilson’s interest was to end the war based on the old order, and build a democratic new order around the United States. The fourteen points expressed Wilson’s ideal conceptions about the new order.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Paris peace conference, which was to handle the postwar problems of World War I, was held with the anticipation for independence of the colonized, including Chosun. The conference based its fundamentals on Woodrow Wilson’s fourteen points, which had included the self-determination of peoples. Wilson’s points were where the colonized found a way of light in their road to independence. Wilson’s declaration of self-determination was a political promise that had been made by the Allied Nations during the war for their own needs, so the colonized nations were highly expecting from the Paris conference.
However, President Wilson’s fourteen points were only to counter the reality where the Soviet Russia, which had succeeded in communist revolution, was earning moral righteousness through measures such as self-determination. It was a symbolic gesture to display morality through democracy and self-determination on a war that was regarded highly immoral. The points were exceedingly ambiguous and had a long distance from the reality of the Great Powers. Wilson, who declared the fourteen points, was the highest sovereignty of the United States, a member of the wartime allied nations. President Wilson’s interest was to end the war based on the old order, and build a democratic new order around the United States. The fourteen points expressed Wilson’s ideal conceptions about the new order.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 전상숙, "제 1차 세계대전 이후 국제질서의 재편과 민족 지도자들의 대외 인식" 한국정치외교사학회 26 (26): 313-350, 2004

2 이우진, "임정의 파리강화회의외교 in : 한불외교사" 평민사 1987

3 "삼 일운동 50주년 기념논집, 동아일보사, 1969"

4 전상숙, "러일전쟁 전후 일본의 대륙정책과 테라우치(寺內正毅)" 한국사회사학회 (71) : 117-153, 2006

5 "동아일보"

6 "독립신문"

7 신재홍, "대한민국임시정부외교사연구" 경희대 1988

8 가토요코, "근대 일본의 전쟁논리" 태학사 2003

9 파리위원부선전국편, "구주의 우리사업" 대한민국임시정부주파리위원부통신국 1921

10 安藤實, "第一次世界大戰と日本帝國主義" 岩波書店 (18) : 1975

11 "滿蒙 第一三卷 第七號, 1932.7"

12 幣原垣, "滿洲觀" 東京寶文館 1916

13 堀川武夫, "極東國際政治史序說－21個條要求の硏究" 有斐閣 1958

14 井上淸, "條約改正-明治の民族問題" 岩波新書 1978

15 大山梓, "山縣有朋意見書" 原書房 1966

16 外務省, "對華要求に關する加藤外相訓令, 日本外交年表竝主要文書 上" 原書房 1965

17 黑田甲子郞, "元帥寺內伯爵傳" 元帥寺內伯爵傳記編纂所 1920

18 Roy W. Curry, "Woodrow Wilson and Far Eastern Policy 1918～1921" Bookman Associates 1957

19 "U.S. Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1915"

20 E. P. Young, "The Presidency of Yuan Shih-kai" University of Michigan Press 1977

21 A. Whitney Grisword, "The Far Eastern Policy of the United States" Yale University Press 1938

22 John M. Thompson, "Russia, Bolshevism, and the Versailles Peace, Princeton" Princeton University Press 1966

23 Ian Nish, "Japanese Foreign Policy in the Interwar Period" Praeger Publishers 2002

24 U.S. Department of State, "Foreign Relations" 1919

25 한국역사연구회, "3 1민족해방운동 연구" 청년사 1989