RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      수동적 동업자와 고정사업장

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82264111

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this article, we have discussed and proposed alternatives for the taxation of partnership whose partners are both (ⅰ) non-resident or foreign entities and (ⅱ) passive partners under the current partnership taxation rules of the Special Tax Treatment Control Act. The current rules provide, where a partnership has a permanent establishment (“PE”) in Korea, that a partner who is not a passive partner is to be regarded as also having a PE in Korea, while a passive partner is to be regarded as having no PE in Korea. As such, taxation on each passive partner is completed through an income tax withholding on a gross revenue allocated by and received from the partnership.
      Under the partnership taxation rules, a partnership is to be regarded as a non-resident or a foreign corporation when calculating the amount of income allocated to its non-resident or foreign corporation partners. Currently, there is no clear provision under the Korean tax law stipulating the method of calculating the amount of income allocated to passive partners for which two contrasting views may exist.
      One view is that the income of partnerships should be calculated in aggregate, taking into account all the revenue earned and expenses incurred by the partnership considering the fact that the partnership has a PE in Korea. This approach is problematic in that such aggregate income calculation method conceptually does not go well with a separate withholding taxation method and also in that neutrality in taxation may not be secured because different tax effects would result under this view compared with the cases where such partners operates their businesses individually.
      Another view is that the income of the partnership allocated to its passive partners should be considered and calculated separately by type of income generated at the partnership level as long as passive partners are regarded as not having a PE in Korea. This view may seem reasonable in that taxation on passive partners are completed through an separate income tax withholding rather than normal tax filings which considers all the Korean source revenue and expenses attributable to a PE in Korea. However, in that the income of passive partners and that of non-passive partners should be calculated separately and differently, this view does not match with the current partnership taxation rules which provide no difference between passive partners and non-passive partners in the calculation of the partnership income allocated to non-resident partners or foreign corporation partners.
      Both of the above views would raise issues, and the selection between these two would be a matter of policy. However, in case where a partnership income allocated to passive partners is calculated in aggregate taking into account all the revenue earned and expenses incurred by the partnership, the passive partner should, in principle, be taxed in the same way as non-passive partners who has a PE in Korea in connection with the partnership. On the other hand, to tax the passive partners through a separate withholding taxation, calculation method of the partnership income allocated to passive partners shall be designed in line with the separate withholding taxation system.
      번역하기

      In this article, we have discussed and proposed alternatives for the taxation of partnership whose partners are both (ⅰ) non-resident or foreign entities and (ⅱ) passive partners under the current partnership taxation rules of the Special Tax Trea...

      In this article, we have discussed and proposed alternatives for the taxation of partnership whose partners are both (ⅰ) non-resident or foreign entities and (ⅱ) passive partners under the current partnership taxation rules of the Special Tax Treatment Control Act. The current rules provide, where a partnership has a permanent establishment (“PE”) in Korea, that a partner who is not a passive partner is to be regarded as also having a PE in Korea, while a passive partner is to be regarded as having no PE in Korea. As such, taxation on each passive partner is completed through an income tax withholding on a gross revenue allocated by and received from the partnership.
      Under the partnership taxation rules, a partnership is to be regarded as a non-resident or a foreign corporation when calculating the amount of income allocated to its non-resident or foreign corporation partners. Currently, there is no clear provision under the Korean tax law stipulating the method of calculating the amount of income allocated to passive partners for which two contrasting views may exist.
      One view is that the income of partnerships should be calculated in aggregate, taking into account all the revenue earned and expenses incurred by the partnership considering the fact that the partnership has a PE in Korea. This approach is problematic in that such aggregate income calculation method conceptually does not go well with a separate withholding taxation method and also in that neutrality in taxation may not be secured because different tax effects would result under this view compared with the cases where such partners operates their businesses individually.
      Another view is that the income of the partnership allocated to its passive partners should be considered and calculated separately by type of income generated at the partnership level as long as passive partners are regarded as not having a PE in Korea. This view may seem reasonable in that taxation on passive partners are completed through an separate income tax withholding rather than normal tax filings which considers all the Korean source revenue and expenses attributable to a PE in Korea. However, in that the income of passive partners and that of non-passive partners should be calculated separately and differently, this view does not match with the current partnership taxation rules which provide no difference between passive partners and non-passive partners in the calculation of the partnership income allocated to non-resident partners or foreign corporation partners.
      Both of the above views would raise issues, and the selection between these two would be a matter of policy. However, in case where a partnership income allocated to passive partners is calculated in aggregate taking into account all the revenue earned and expenses incurred by the partnership, the passive partner should, in principle, be taxed in the same way as non-passive partners who has a PE in Korea in connection with the partnership. On the other hand, to tax the passive partners through a separate withholding taxation, calculation method of the partnership income allocated to passive partners shall be designed in line with the separate withholding taxation system.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 외국인인 수동적 동업자에 대한 과세의 개요
      • Ⅲ. 외국인인 수동적 동업자에 대한 현행 과세제도의 문제점과 개선방안
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      • 〈參考文獻〉
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 외국인인 수동적 동업자에 대한 과세의 개요
      • Ⅲ. 외국인인 수동적 동업자에 대한 현행 과세제도의 문제점과 개선방안
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      • 〈參考文獻〉
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김진수, "파트너십 제도에 관한 연구" 한국조세연구원 2000

      2 박훈, "파트너십 과세제도 도입에 대비한 공동사업과세의 개선방안―민법상 조합을 중심으로―" 한국세무학회 2007

      3 안종석, "파트너십 과세제도 도입방안" 한국조세연구원 2007

      4 재정경제부 TF팀, "파트너십 과세제도 TF 논의결과" 한국조세연구원 2007

      5 김재진, "파트너십 과세제도" 한국조세연구원 2004

      6 이은미, "조합의 과세에 관한 연구" 한양대학교 대학원 2007

      7 이준규, "조세특례제한법상 동업기업 과세특례제도의타당성에 관한 연구" 한국세법학회 14 (14): 51-98, 2008

      8 이준규, "세법개론" (주)영화조세통람 2009

      9 이철송, "상법강의" 박영사 2009

      10 이준규, "법인에 대한 도관과세의 문제점과 개선방안" 한국세무학회 9 (9): 9-27, 2008

      1 김진수, "파트너십 제도에 관한 연구" 한국조세연구원 2000

      2 박훈, "파트너십 과세제도 도입에 대비한 공동사업과세의 개선방안―민법상 조합을 중심으로―" 한국세무학회 2007

      3 안종석, "파트너십 과세제도 도입방안" 한국조세연구원 2007

      4 재정경제부 TF팀, "파트너십 과세제도 TF 논의결과" 한국조세연구원 2007

      5 김재진, "파트너십 과세제도" 한국조세연구원 2004

      6 이은미, "조합의 과세에 관한 연구" 한양대학교 대학원 2007

      7 이준규, "조세특례제한법상 동업기업 과세특례제도의타당성에 관한 연구" 한국세법학회 14 (14): 51-98, 2008

      8 이준규, "세법개론" (주)영화조세통람 2009

      9 이철송, "상법강의" 박영사 2009

      10 이준규, "법인에 대한 도관과세의 문제점과 개선방안" 한국세무학회 9 (9): 9-27, 2008

      11 이준규, "미국의 파트너십 과세제도" 한국조세연구원 2007

      12 이준규, "동업기업에의 출자와 관련한 과세상의 쟁점" 한국세법학회 14 (14): 128-161, 2008

      13 김인근, "국제조세의 이론과 실무" (주)광교TNS 2001

      14 OECD, "The Application of the OECD Model Tax Convention to Partnerships, in Issues in Internation Taxation No. 6"

      15 Lind, Stephen A., "Fundamentals of Partnership Taxation" Foundation Press 2005

      16 Burke, Karen C., "Federal Income Taxation of Partners and Partnerships, 3rd ed" 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.78 0.78 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.63 0.58 0.819 0.22
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼