RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      비잔티움 제국의 군사조직과 사회구조의 변화 -테마제도의 변천을 중심으로- = A Shift of the Military and Social Structures of the Byzantine Empire: On the Mutation of Thema System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77026520

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Much part of the soldiers of thema (themata) in the Byzantine Empire is regarded to be indigenous, supported by their families, most of them being farmers, not necessarily however. They were called for duty whenever in need, returning home in winter and peace of time. The thema refered to army itself first, then to the area where the army stationed, and last to administrative area. The usage of thema for administrative area following the designation of army appeared in the 670s first time in the sources, while the words, `stratos` as well as `strateuma` was much more generally used for meaning army. The theses around themata are about when they came into existence, whether the recruitment of soldiers is related to holdings of land or alledged `military land`, etc. This essay do not concern with the origin of thema system, but just with the relation between the soldiers of thema and land holdings over the 7th to the 10th century, what political and sociological meanings a series of agricultural laws enacted in the 10th century have, and what meaning of historical context the fiscalization of military service has, The question about which of the two, person or land, military service was imposed upon could not be easily answered, as it did not follow to a uniformed norm but depended largely on confronted situations. Generally, active military service in person was more preferred by the Empire until the 9th century than later, and in the 10th and 11th centuries the fiscalization of military service got more intensified. As time passed on, the generals (strategos) as well as the soldiers of thema gradually lost significance and gave in to administrative bureaucrats and the mercenaries more mobile and more aggressive. With the development of thema system, the Empire enlarged the object of imposing military duty in person and in property. And this process has a close connection with intensifing governmental control and tax collection of the Empire, the tax referring to land (jugatio) as well as poll tax (capitatio) and household (kapnikon). A previlege of being exempted from a kind of particular tax was to be awarded to the common farmer, as he recorded in the military duty. The dissemination of military service to the peasant society coincides with the strengthening political power of the Empire itself, and the bureaucracy of thema and its breaking into parts. This process kept going on over the 7th to the 11th, 12th centuries. Moreover, the criminal laws of the Empire got inforced and more atrocious, too. Thus, the transition of the form of military service and the system of land holdings and taxation influenced not simply to military system, but generally to the governmental system of the Empire which permeated into the lowest stratum of society of farmers as well as the sphere of church. In short, the expansion of the military and then the administrative structure of thema made an opportunity of intensifing the subordination of farmers and ecclesiastical society to the military-administrative system of the Byzantine Empire.
      번역하기

      Much part of the soldiers of thema (themata) in the Byzantine Empire is regarded to be indigenous, supported by their families, most of them being farmers, not necessarily however. They were called for duty whenever in need, returning home in winter a...

      Much part of the soldiers of thema (themata) in the Byzantine Empire is regarded to be indigenous, supported by their families, most of them being farmers, not necessarily however. They were called for duty whenever in need, returning home in winter and peace of time. The thema refered to army itself first, then to the area where the army stationed, and last to administrative area. The usage of thema for administrative area following the designation of army appeared in the 670s first time in the sources, while the words, `stratos` as well as `strateuma` was much more generally used for meaning army. The theses around themata are about when they came into existence, whether the recruitment of soldiers is related to holdings of land or alledged `military land`, etc. This essay do not concern with the origin of thema system, but just with the relation between the soldiers of thema and land holdings over the 7th to the 10th century, what political and sociological meanings a series of agricultural laws enacted in the 10th century have, and what meaning of historical context the fiscalization of military service has, The question about which of the two, person or land, military service was imposed upon could not be easily answered, as it did not follow to a uniformed norm but depended largely on confronted situations. Generally, active military service in person was more preferred by the Empire until the 9th century than later, and in the 10th and 11th centuries the fiscalization of military service got more intensified. As time passed on, the generals (strategos) as well as the soldiers of thema gradually lost significance and gave in to administrative bureaucrats and the mercenaries more mobile and more aggressive. With the development of thema system, the Empire enlarged the object of imposing military duty in person and in property. And this process has a close connection with intensifing governmental control and tax collection of the Empire, the tax referring to land (jugatio) as well as poll tax (capitatio) and household (kapnikon). A previlege of being exempted from a kind of particular tax was to be awarded to the common farmer, as he recorded in the military duty. The dissemination of military service to the peasant society coincides with the strengthening political power of the Empire itself, and the bureaucracy of thema and its breaking into parts. This process kept going on over the 7th to the 11th, 12th centuries. Moreover, the criminal laws of the Empire got inforced and more atrocious, too. Thus, the transition of the form of military service and the system of land holdings and taxation influenced not simply to military system, but generally to the governmental system of the Empire which permeated into the lowest stratum of society of farmers as well as the sphere of church. In short, the expansion of the military and then the administrative structure of thema made an opportunity of intensifing the subordination of farmers and ecclesiastical society to the military-administrative system of the Byzantine Empire.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김차규, "비잔티움 제국의 테마제도: 기원문제를 중심으로" 3 : 32-33, 1998

      2 E.H. Kantorowicz, "비잔티움 제국의 봉건제" 234-235,

      3 G. Ostrogorsky, "비잔티움 제국사"

      4 한정숙, "비잔티움 제국사" 까치글방 1999

      5 김차규, "레오 3세와 성상파괴논쟁" 10 : 126-, 1999

      6 R. J. Lilie, "“‘Thrakien’ und ‘Thrakesion’: Zur Byzantinischen Provinzorganisation am Ende des 7 Jahrhunderts" 26 : 7-47, 1977

      7 J. Haldon, "Warfare, State and Society in the Byzantine World"

      8 F.I. Uspenskij, "Voennoe ustrojstvo vizantijskoj imperii" 6 : 154-207, 1900

      9 G. Fatouros, "Theodori Studitae Epistulae" 61-63, 1992

      10 D. Gorecki, "The strateia of Constantine VII : the Legal Status, Administration, and Historical Background" 82 : 1989

      1 김차규, "비잔티움 제국의 테마제도: 기원문제를 중심으로" 3 : 32-33, 1998

      2 E.H. Kantorowicz, "비잔티움 제국의 봉건제" 234-235,

      3 G. Ostrogorsky, "비잔티움 제국사"

      4 한정숙, "비잔티움 제국사" 까치글방 1999

      5 김차규, "레오 3세와 성상파괴논쟁" 10 : 126-, 1999

      6 R. J. Lilie, "“‘Thrakien’ und ‘Thrakesion’: Zur Byzantinischen Provinzorganisation am Ende des 7 Jahrhunderts" 26 : 7-47, 1977

      7 J. Haldon, "Warfare, State and Society in the Byzantine World"

      8 F.I. Uspenskij, "Voennoe ustrojstvo vizantijskoj imperii" 6 : 154-207, 1900

      9 G. Fatouros, "Theodori Studitae Epistulae" 61-63, 1992

      10 D. Gorecki, "The strateia of Constantine VII : the Legal Status, Administration, and Historical Background" 82 : 1989

      11 P. Alexander, "The Patriarch Nicephorus of Constantinopli in: Ecclesiastical Policy and Image Worship in the Byzantine Empire" 117ff-, 1958

      12 T.E. Gregory, "The Ekloga of Leo III and the Concept of Philanthropia" 7 : 267-287, 1975

      13 J. C. Cheynet, "The Byzantine Aristocracy and its Military Function" 2006

      14 J.F. Haldon, "The Arab-Byzantine Frontier in the English and Ninth Centuries: Military Organisation and Society in the Borderlands" 19 : 79-116, 1980

      15 P. Lemerle, "The Agrarian History of Byzantium from the Origins to the Twelfth Century"

      16 G. Ostrogorsky, "Sur la date de la composition du Livre des Thèmes et surl'époque de la constitution des premiers thèmes d'Asie Mineure" 23 : 55-, 1953

      17 M. Gregoriou-Ioannidou, "Stratologia kai eggeia stratiotike idioktesia sto Byzantio" 4 : 62ff-, 1988

      18 J.F. Haldon, "Some Remarks on the Background to the Iconoclast Controversy" 38 : 161-184, 1977

      19 W.E. Kaegi, "Some Reconsiderations on the Themes : seventh-Ninth Centuries" 16 : 39-53, 1967

      20 J.F. Haldon, "Recruitment and Conscription in the Byzantine Army c.550~950 : a Study on the Origins of the stratiotika ktemat" 357 : 1979

      21 H. Ahrweiler, "Recherches sur l'administration de l'empire byzantin aux IXe-XIe siècles’" 84 : 12ff-, 1960

      22 M. Grigoriou- Ioannidou, "Parakmi kai Ptosi tou Thematikou Thesmou" 111-,

      23 Alexander P. Kazhdan, "Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium" 2034-2035, 1991

      24 J. Haldon, "Military Service, Military Lands, and the Status of Soldiers: Current Problems and Interpretations" 47 : 1993

      25 P. Oikonomides, "Middle Byzantine Provincial Recruits : salary and Armament in: Gonimos : Neoplatonic and Byzantine Studies presented to Leendert G. Westerink at 75" 1988

      26 J. Howard-Johnston, "Maistor : Classical, Byzantine, and Renaissance studies for Robert Browning" Canberra 189-197, 1984

      27 E. Patlagen, "L’impôt payé par les soldats in: Armées et fiscalité dan le monde antique" 303-309, 1977

      28 A. Pertusi, "La formation des thèmes byzantins in: Berichte zum XI Internationalen Byzantinischen-Kongress" 33ff-, 1958

      29 J.B. Bury, "History of the Later Roman Empire : From the Death of Theodosius I to the Death of Justinian" 1958

      30 Scriptor Incertus, "Historia de Leone Armenii, Bardae filio, in Izbori zabulgarskata istorija, v. 8" 16-24, 1961

      31 J. Haldon, "Esquisse pour un histoire agraire de Byzance" 219 : 37-24, 1958

      32 R. J. Lilie, "Die zweihundertjärige Reform : Zu den Anfängen der Themenorganisation im 7 und 8 Jahrhundert" 45 : 27-39, 1984

      33 R.J. Lilie, "Die zweihunderjärige Reform" 196f-,

      34 R. J. Lilie, "Die Byzantinische Reaktion auf die Ausbreitung der Araber" 287-321, 1976

      35 Miracula S. Georgii, "Das Drachenwunder des heiligen Georg in der griechischen und lateinischen Überlieferung" Leipzig 19-21, 1911

      36 G. Ostrogorsky, "Byzantinische Grschichte 324~1453" 1996

      37 J.F. Haldon, "Byzantine Praetorians: An Administrative, Institutional, and Social Survey of the Opsikion and Tagmata, c.580~900" 3 : 164-174, 1984

      38 O.R.S. Lopez, "Byzantine Law in the Seventh Century and its Reception by the Germans and the Arabs" 16 : 445-, 1942

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-08 학술지등록 한글명 : 서양사론
      외국어명 : The Western History Review
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.31 0.31 0.23
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.26 0.26 0.494 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼