RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Scrambling from Head-internal Relative Clauses

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103952542

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this paper, I have discussed scrambling from kes constructions. In terms of scrambling, kes constructions are considerably freer than other types of complex noun phrases such as the HeRC and the free nominal CNP, which are a strong island for scrambling. However, this does not entail that scrambling from kes constructions is always acceptable. That is, kes constructions show some island effects on scrambling. For example, adjuncts cannot be scrambled from both the HiRC and the NCC constructions. This implies that kes constructions are always an island for scrambling of adjuncts. Also, the HiRC differs from the NCC; namely, scrambling from the HiRC construction is more restrictive than the one from the NCC construction. In particular, an element can be scrambled out of the HiRC construction if and only if it is the internal head of the relative clause. Otherwise, the HiRC is an island for scrambling. In contrast, the NCC construction is free from such island condition on the semantic properties of the scrambled element. In conclusion, in terms of scrambling, the two types of kes constructions are distinguished from each other. In other words, scrambling is a useful syntactic tool to divide kes constructions into two types: HiRC vs. NCC.
      번역하기

      In this paper, I have discussed scrambling from kes constructions. In terms of scrambling, kes constructions are considerably freer than other types of complex noun phrases such as the HeRC and the free nominal CNP, which are a strong island for scram...

      In this paper, I have discussed scrambling from kes constructions. In terms of scrambling, kes constructions are considerably freer than other types of complex noun phrases such as the HeRC and the free nominal CNP, which are a strong island for scrambling. However, this does not entail that scrambling from kes constructions is always acceptable. That is, kes constructions show some island effects on scrambling. For example, adjuncts cannot be scrambled from both the HiRC and the NCC constructions. This implies that kes constructions are always an island for scrambling of adjuncts. Also, the HiRC differs from the NCC; namely, scrambling from the HiRC construction is more restrictive than the one from the NCC construction. In particular, an element can be scrambled out of the HiRC construction if and only if it is the internal head of the relative clause. Otherwise, the HiRC is an island for scrambling. In contrast, the NCC construction is free from such island condition on the semantic properties of the scrambled element. In conclusion, in terms of scrambling, the two types of kes constructions are distinguished from each other. In other words, scrambling is a useful syntactic tool to divide kes constructions into two types: HiRC vs. NCC.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Sohn, H. M., "The Korean language" Cambridge University Press 1999

      2 Lee, J. R., "The Korean internally-headed relative clause construction: Its morphological, syntactic, semantic aspects" University of Arizona 2006

      3 Culy, C. D., "Syntax and Semantics of Internally Headed Relative Clauses" Stanford University 1990

      4 Saito, M., "Scrambling as Semantically Vacuous A’-movement in : Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure" University of Chicago Press 1989

      5 Boškovič, Željko, "Scrambling and last resort" 29 : 347-366, 1998

      6 Keenan, E. L., "Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar" 8 : 63-99, 1977

      7 Jhang, S.-E., "Headed nominalizations in Korean: Relative clauses, clefts, and comparatives" Simon Fraser University 1994

      8 Jo, J.-M., "Grammatical effects of topic and focus information" University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2004

      9 Kim, M.-J., "Event-structure and the internally-headed relative clause construction in Korean and Japanese" University of Massachusetts Amherst 2004

      10 Cha, J.-Y., "Constraints on clausal complex noun phrases in Korean with focus on the gapless relative clause construction" University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2005

      1 Sohn, H. M., "The Korean language" Cambridge University Press 1999

      2 Lee, J. R., "The Korean internally-headed relative clause construction: Its morphological, syntactic, semantic aspects" University of Arizona 2006

      3 Culy, C. D., "Syntax and Semantics of Internally Headed Relative Clauses" Stanford University 1990

      4 Saito, M., "Scrambling as Semantically Vacuous A’-movement in : Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure" University of Chicago Press 1989

      5 Boškovič, Željko, "Scrambling and last resort" 29 : 347-366, 1998

      6 Keenan, E. L., "Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar" 8 : 63-99, 1977

      7 Jhang, S.-E., "Headed nominalizations in Korean: Relative clauses, clefts, and comparatives" Simon Fraser University 1994

      8 Jo, J.-M., "Grammatical effects of topic and focus information" University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2004

      9 Kim, M.-J., "Event-structure and the internally-headed relative clause construction in Korean and Japanese" University of Massachusetts Amherst 2004

      10 Cha, J.-Y., "Constraints on clausal complex noun phrases in Korean with focus on the gapless relative clause construction" University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2005

      11 Chomsky, N., "Barriers" MIT Press 1986

      12 Sportiche, D., "A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and Its Corollaries for Constituent Structure" 19 : 425-449, 1988

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.45
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.4 0.38 0.67 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼