1920년대 중국의 우생논쟁 ―‘우생적 연애’개념을 중심으로 한 서구 우생담론의 중국적 수용 = The Eugenic Disputes in China in the 1920s: the Chinese Way of Reception of Western Discourse on Eugenics focusing on the Concept of “Eugenic Love”

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

From a critical perspective on the dichotomous approach of tradition and modernity, this article addresses that Chinese intellectuals received Western knowledge of eugenics in a variety through the consciousness of the particularity of Chinese society and a sense of class distinction, from the eugenics dispute between Zhou Jianren and Pan Guangdan in the May Fourth Movement period. While Zhou Jianren faithfully followed Havelock Ellis in putting emphasis on the dimension of individual choice and criticizing the extended family system, he remained insisting on biological dominance as the basis of sex selection, falling behind Ellis who had advanced to variable characteristics of sexuality. Pan Guangdan, on the other hand, accounted much of the particularity of Chinese society distinct from the West, put emphasis on eugenic characteristics of arranged marriage, and had a sense of proportion that inferior genes of Chinese people could improve not just through demographic control policies but also through planting and environment improvement. But, insensitive to class distinctions, Pan indiscriminately introduced Ellis’ advocacy of early marriage advanced in the context of Europe into Chinese society, disclosing his anti-democratic disposition apathetic to the tragedy of the week. The issue of eugenic disputes, “Is love in the unity of flesh and spirit eugenic?” was in fact something beyond ‘scientific’ explanation and nonexistent in reality. Nevertheless, the eugenic argument that the public good can be achieved through private affairs – ‘love’ was authentically accepted by intellectual circles at the beginning of the twentieth century, which this article finds the reason from the antinomic nature of demography that eugenic ‘knowledges’ swayed the power to disguise a political matter of population as unpolitical, rendering it possible to control individuals.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 폴 슈메이커, "진보와 보수의 12가지 이념: 다원적 공공정치를 위한 철학" 후마니타스 2010

2 사카모토 히로코, "중국민족주의의 신화" 한울 2007

3 페이샤오퉁, "중국 사회문화의 원형-향토중국" 비봉출판사 2011

4 백영경, "인구위기론과 “불안한 미래”의 재생산 정치, In “시장사회”:감정의 정치경제학과 여성주의 대안으로서의 노동윤리학"

5 정세권, "인간에 대한 ‘미국식 과학’의 형성: 대번포트(Charles Benedict Davenport)의 우생학" 한국과학사학회 30 (30): 139-169, 2008

6 강태웅, "우생학과 일본인의 표상 ─1920-40년대 일본 우생학의 전개와 특성─" 일본연구소 38 : 29-46, 2013

7 앙드레 피쇼, "우생학, 유전학의 숨겨진 역사" 아침이슬 2009

8 리디아 리우, "언어횡단적 실천" 소명 2005

9 프라센지트 두아라, "민족으로부터 역사를 구출하기" 삼인 2004

10 버트런드 러셀, "러셀 북경에 가다" 천지인 2009

11 박유하, "내셔널 아이덴티티와 젠더-나쓰메 소세키로 읽는 근대" 문학동네 2011

12 장징, "근대 중국과 연애의 발견" 소나무 2007

13 문명기, "근대 일본 식민지 통치모델의 轉移와 그 의미 ― ‘臺灣모델’의 關東州ㆍ朝鮮에의 적용 시도와 변용 ―" 중국근현대사학회 (53) : 199-220, 2012

14 진관타오, "관념사란 무엇인가-1이론과 방법" 푸른역사 2010

15 周建人, "達爾文與生物進化論" 中國靑年社 (5) : 1949

16 Y.D, "近代的戀愛觀-日本廚川白村原著" 8 (8): 1922

17 呂文浩, "潘光旦" 福建敎育出版社 2009

18 潘光旦, "民族特性與民族衛生" 北京大学出版社 2010

19 潘光旦, "民族特性與民族衛生" 北京大學出版社 2010

20 李文海, "民國時期社會調査叢編-婚姻家政卷" 福建敎育出版社 2006

21 梁曉春, "時論「中國人口問題」的總答辯" 24 (24):

22 周建人, "戀愛選擇與優生學" 11 (11): 1925

23 與謝野晶子, "戀愛與性慾" 8 (8): 1922

24 周建人, "戀愛結婚與將來的人種問題" 8 (8): 1922

25 周建人, "戀愛的意義與價値" 8 (8): 1922

26 霭理士, "性心理學" 商務印書館 2008

27 克士, "家庭制度的應當改革" 8 (8): 1922

28 喬峰, "婦女運動中的思想解放" 8 (8): 1922

29 潘光旦, "優生槪論" 北京大學出版社 2010

30 陳長蘅, "中國近百八十餘年來人口增加之徐速及今後之調劑方法" 24 (24):

31 周建人, "中國女子的覺醒與獨身" 8 (8): 1922

32 潘光旦, "中國之優生問題" 21 (21): 1924

33 가토 슈이치, "‘연애결혼’은 무엇을 가져왔는가?" 小花 2013

34 Havelock Ellis, "Love and Marriage" G. P. Putnam's Sons 1911

35 Barlow, Tani E, "Body, Subject and Power in China" The University of Chicago Press 1994

36 黃姸, "20世紀40年代的“生育節制”思潮及其歷史地位" 28 (28): 2007

37 오병수, "1920년대 전반 ？東方雜誌？에 나타난 公理的 世界認識 ― 중국 자유주의 지식인의 동아시아 인식을 중심으로" 한국중국학회 48 : 463-, 2003