RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      운동역학 : 보행 시 폴의 사용이 하지 근육 활동에 미치는 영향 분석 = Electromyographic Analyses of the Effects of Poles during Normal Walking

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106552090

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the walking pole on the lower limb muscles. Fourteen subjects performed walking exercise at a cadence of 110 beats/min, without pole, with one pole, and with two poles, respectively. For each variable, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine whether there were significant differences among the three types of walking. When a significant difference was found in walking type, post hoc analyses were performed using the tukey procedure. A confidence level of p < .05 was used to determine statistical significance.The results showed that significant changes in averaged IEMG values occurred with walking with one pole in the vastus medialis and the lateral gastrocnemius during the IDLS phase, and in the lateral gastrocnemius during the TDLS phase. During the TDLS phase, walking with two poles produced a significantly lower Averaged IEMG values than normal walking in the medial gastrocnemius. The results also found that the peak IEMG activity of the tibialis anterior and the lateral gastrocnemius during ISLS phase for walking with one pole and two poles was significantly lower than the corresponding values in the normal walking, while the walking with one pole and two poles exhibited a significant difference with the normal walking in the medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscles during TDLS phase.In general, the walking with pole influenced the average IEMG and Peak IEMG values of most triceps surae. The use of walking poles alleviated some stress from the ankle joint and allowed reduced activity in triceps surae. This reductions seen walking with poles compared with the normal walking were caused primarily by the force applied to the pole before and after heel strike. It is concluded that walking poles do not seem to exert a more expressive influence in the knee joint than in the ankle joint. This study suggest that further research is necessary to determine the effectiveness of walking poles on the EMG activity of leg muscles during walking on the ramp. These data also serve as a guide for clinicians when considering incorporation of walking poles into patient management.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the walking pole on the lower limb muscles. Fourteen subjects performed walking exercise at a cadence of 110 beats/min, without pole, with one pole, and with two poles, respectively. For each va...

      The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the walking pole on the lower limb muscles. Fourteen subjects performed walking exercise at a cadence of 110 beats/min, without pole, with one pole, and with two poles, respectively. For each variable, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine whether there were significant differences among the three types of walking. When a significant difference was found in walking type, post hoc analyses were performed using the tukey procedure. A confidence level of p < .05 was used to determine statistical significance.The results showed that significant changes in averaged IEMG values occurred with walking with one pole in the vastus medialis and the lateral gastrocnemius during the IDLS phase, and in the lateral gastrocnemius during the TDLS phase. During the TDLS phase, walking with two poles produced a significantly lower Averaged IEMG values than normal walking in the medial gastrocnemius. The results also found that the peak IEMG activity of the tibialis anterior and the lateral gastrocnemius during ISLS phase for walking with one pole and two poles was significantly lower than the corresponding values in the normal walking, while the walking with one pole and two poles exhibited a significant difference with the normal walking in the medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscles during TDLS phase.In general, the walking with pole influenced the average IEMG and Peak IEMG values of most triceps surae. The use of walking poles alleviated some stress from the ankle joint and allowed reduced activity in triceps surae. This reductions seen walking with poles compared with the normal walking were caused primarily by the force applied to the pole before and after heel strike. It is concluded that walking poles do not seem to exert a more expressive influence in the knee joint than in the ankle joint. This study suggest that further research is necessary to determine the effectiveness of walking poles on the EMG activity of leg muscles during walking on the ramp. These data also serve as a guide for clinicians when considering incorporation of walking poles into patient management.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "몸에 좋은 워킹 건강에 이만한 게 또 있을까" 2004

      2 Hefti, "Wanderstoecke und Sturzhaeufigkeit Schweizerische Zeitschrift fuer Sportmedizin und Sporttraumatologie" 49 (49): 82-83, 2001

      3 Brunelle, "The effects of wallking poles on ground reaction forces" 1998

      4 Landesarszt der Bayerischen Bergwacht Munich Menich Medicine Wachertsm 13, "Ski poles in the summer" 1981

      5 Knight, "Muscular and metabolic costs of uphill backpacking Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise" 32 (32): 2093-2101, 2000

      6 Jacobson, "Load carriage energy expenditure with and without hiking poles during inclined walking International Journal of Sports Medicine" 21 (21): 356-359, 2000

      7 Mueller, "Knee joint forces during downhill walking with hiking poles Journal of Sports Sciences" 17 (17): 969-978, 1999

      8 Wilson, "Effects of walking poles on lower extremity gait mechanics Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise" 33 (33): 142-147, 2001

      9 Jacobson B, "Comparison of hiking stick use on lateral stability while balancing with and without a load" 85 (85): 347-50, 1997

      10 Jacobson, "A field test comparison of hiking stick use on the heart rate and rating of perceived exertion" 87 (87): 435-438, 1998

      1 "몸에 좋은 워킹 건강에 이만한 게 또 있을까" 2004

      2 Hefti, "Wanderstoecke und Sturzhaeufigkeit Schweizerische Zeitschrift fuer Sportmedizin und Sporttraumatologie" 49 (49): 82-83, 2001

      3 Brunelle, "The effects of wallking poles on ground reaction forces" 1998

      4 Landesarszt der Bayerischen Bergwacht Munich Menich Medicine Wachertsm 13, "Ski poles in the summer" 1981

      5 Knight, "Muscular and metabolic costs of uphill backpacking Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise" 32 (32): 2093-2101, 2000

      6 Jacobson, "Load carriage energy expenditure with and without hiking poles during inclined walking International Journal of Sports Medicine" 21 (21): 356-359, 2000

      7 Mueller, "Knee joint forces during downhill walking with hiking poles Journal of Sports Sciences" 17 (17): 969-978, 1999

      8 Wilson, "Effects of walking poles on lower extremity gait mechanics Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise" 33 (33): 142-147, 2001

      9 Jacobson B, "Comparison of hiking stick use on lateral stability while balancing with and without a load" 85 (85): 347-50, 1997

      10 Jacobson, "A field test comparison of hiking stick use on the heart rate and rating of perceived exertion" 87 (87): 435-438, 1998

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.34 1.34 1.4
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.44 1.45 1.24 0.33
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼