RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    非常會議(1931)의 조직특성과 실제공작

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82612471

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    It is so called Tangshan Incident that Chiang Kai-Shek had confined Hu Han-Min, who was the Chairperson of Legislative Yuan at that time, because of the reason that Hu's political opinion was different from his. The incident occurred around when the political situation was barely stabilized just in short period after the end of Central Plains War, which was the biggest civil war in Republic of China, was a critical incident that might have caused another full-scale civil war at any moment in some cases. After the Tangshan Incident, Chiang Kai-Shek and Central Nanjing regarded the series of situations as a political problem inside the Nationalist Party that could be solved by conversation and compromise, and tried to draw Chen Ji-Tang and Chen Ming-Shu round into his side, who were two biggest military wheels in Guangdong, in order to avoid expansion of the situation. This is another evidence showing the special situation of Republic of China that even political event must have been linked with military power after all. After the Tangshan Incident, the standpoint of anti-Chiang party was also to solve the situation in peaceful way. Chen Ji-Tang and Ko Yingfun , who played pivotal roles of anti-central movement with YangGuang at that time, had set the recovery of Hu's personal freedom as the first objective and processed the negotiation with the Nanjing side. As the strife triggered by Tangshan Incident could have not been solved smoothly, anti-Chang camp with the central figure of YangGuang established 'Emergency Council' and 'Guangzhou Republic Government' as central organizations of the ruling party and government to lead the anti-Chiang campaign. As of its consequence, the disruption reappeared in the end that two different parties and governments were quarreling with each other to take over the legitimacy in one territory of Republic of China. The political operation of Emergency Council was covering very wide range of ruling issues. The core issues of political operation that Emergency Council had faced were political decision making, political leading of the republic government, arrangement of the 4th National Congress, arrangement of the preliminary meeting for National Council, preparation of local autonomy. The various plans on the party affairs and political affairs that had been prepared by Emergency Council could not be carried out because of the outbreak of Sep 18th Incident. The leadership of Emergency Council could be evaluated to be accurate, nevertheless, in the point that the political claims of Emergency Council were complying with the request of party members and people at that time.
    번역하기

    It is so called Tangshan Incident that Chiang Kai-Shek had confined Hu Han-Min, who was the Chairperson of Legislative Yuan at that time, because of the reason that Hu's political opinion was different from his. The incident occurred around when the p...

    It is so called Tangshan Incident that Chiang Kai-Shek had confined Hu Han-Min, who was the Chairperson of Legislative Yuan at that time, because of the reason that Hu's political opinion was different from his. The incident occurred around when the political situation was barely stabilized just in short period after the end of Central Plains War, which was the biggest civil war in Republic of China, was a critical incident that might have caused another full-scale civil war at any moment in some cases. After the Tangshan Incident, Chiang Kai-Shek and Central Nanjing regarded the series of situations as a political problem inside the Nationalist Party that could be solved by conversation and compromise, and tried to draw Chen Ji-Tang and Chen Ming-Shu round into his side, who were two biggest military wheels in Guangdong, in order to avoid expansion of the situation. This is another evidence showing the special situation of Republic of China that even political event must have been linked with military power after all. After the Tangshan Incident, the standpoint of anti-Chiang party was also to solve the situation in peaceful way. Chen Ji-Tang and Ko Yingfun , who played pivotal roles of anti-central movement with YangGuang at that time, had set the recovery of Hu's personal freedom as the first objective and processed the negotiation with the Nanjing side. As the strife triggered by Tangshan Incident could have not been solved smoothly, anti-Chang camp with the central figure of YangGuang established 'Emergency Council' and 'Guangzhou Republic Government' as central organizations of the ruling party and government to lead the anti-Chiang campaign. As of its consequence, the disruption reappeared in the end that two different parties and governments were quarreling with each other to take over the legitimacy in one territory of Republic of China. The political operation of Emergency Council was covering very wide range of ruling issues. The core issues of political operation that Emergency Council had faced were political decision making, political leading of the republic government, arrangement of the 4th National Congress, arrangement of the preliminary meeting for National Council, preparation of local autonomy. The various plans on the party affairs and political affairs that had been prepared by Emergency Council could not be carried out because of the outbreak of Sep 18th Incident. The leadership of Emergency Council could be evaluated to be accurate, nevertheless, in the point that the political claims of Emergency Council were complying with the request of party members and people at that time.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 소집경과와 조직특성
    • Ⅲ. 실제공작의 추진
    • Ⅳ. 맺음말
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 소집경과와 조직특성
    • Ⅲ. 실제공작의 추진
    • Ⅳ. 맺음말
    • 《참고문헌》
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 朱宗震, "陳銘樞回憶錄" 中國文史出版社 1997

    2 廣東省檔案館, "陳濟棠硏究史料(1928-1936)" 廣東省檔案館 1985

    3 蕭自力, "陳濟棠" 廣東人民出版社 2002

    4 "蔣中正總統檔案·文物·革命文獻"

    5 "蔣中正總統檔案·文物·事略稿本"

    6 王瑞炯, "苦笑錄-陳公博回憶" 香港大學亞洲硏究中心 1979

    7 薛光前, "艱苦建國的十年" 正中書局 1971

    8 周聿峨, "胡漢民" 廣東人民出版社 1991

    9 程天固, "程天固回憶錄" 龍文出版社 1993

    10 沈雲龍, "民國史事與人物論叢" 傳記文學出版社 1981

    1 朱宗震, "陳銘樞回憶錄" 中國文史出版社 1997

    2 廣東省檔案館, "陳濟棠硏究史料(1928-1936)" 廣東省檔案館 1985

    3 蕭自力, "陳濟棠" 廣東人民出版社 2002

    4 "蔣中正總統檔案·文物·革命文獻"

    5 "蔣中正總統檔案·文物·事略稿本"

    6 王瑞炯, "苦笑錄-陳公博回憶" 香港大學亞洲硏究中心 1979

    7 薛光前, "艱苦建國的十年" 正中書局 1971

    8 周聿峨, "胡漢民" 廣東人民出版社 1991

    9 程天固, "程天固回憶錄" 龍文出版社 1993

    10 沈雲龍, "民國史事與人物論叢" 傳記文學出版社 1981

    11 呂芳上, "抗戰前的中央與地方-以蔣介石先生與廣東陳濟棠關係爲例(一九二六-一九三六)" 144 : 2001

    12 楊天石, "尋求歷史的謎底(下)" 文史哲出版社 1994

    13 "國聞週報"

    14 査建瑜, "國民黨改組派資料選編" 湖南人民出版社 1986

    15 羅翼群, "南天歲月: 陳濟棠主粵時期見聞實錄" 廣東人民出版社 1987

    16 國民經濟計劃委員會, "十年來之中國經濟建設" 扶輪日報社 1937

    17 郭廷以, "中華民國史事日誌, 第三冊" 中央硏究院近代史硏究所 1979

    18 張玉法, "中國現代政治史論" 東華書局 1988

    19 張玉法, "中國現代史" 東華書局 1987

    20 雷嘯岑, "三十年動亂中國" 亞洲出版社 1955

    21 김영신, "‘湯山事件’ 후의 정국과 ‘反蔣派’의 動態" 중국학연구회 (53) : 305-329, 2010

    22 James Sheridan, "Chinese Warlord: The Career of Feng Yu-Hsiang" Stanford University Press 1966

    23 Arthur N. Young, "China's Nation-Building Effort, 1927-1937: The Financial and Economic Record" Hoover Institute Press 1971

    24 周康燮, "1927-1934年的反蔣戰爭" 大東圖書公司 1978

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.4 0.4 0.49
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.45 0.43 1.181 0.14
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼