RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      한·중 무형문화유산 보호정책 비교연구 = A Comparative Study on Protection Policies for Intangible Cultural Heritages between Korea and China

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103977992

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      A Comparative Study on Protection Policies for Intangible Cultural Heritages between Korea and China Zhang Mei Na Sungkyunkwan University A fact that culture comes to exert the most important influence in the international society for the cultural cen...

      A Comparative Study on Protection Policies for Intangible Cultural Heritages between Korea and China Zhang Mei Na Sungkyunkwan University A fact that culture comes to exert the most important influence in the international society for the cultural century is not new. In particular, It? safe to say that the interest in the intangible cultural heritage is the recently international flow. And, the interest of non-Western countries in the intangible cultural heritage is higher than the Western countries.
      This study carried out the research on protection policies for intangible cultural heritages of Korea and China, which is multiracial. Korea? protection policy for intangible cultural properties was arranged the legal and institutional foundation as「Cultural Properties Protection Act」had been enacted in 1962. Thus, the protection for intangible cultural properties has been carried out in the national dimension, and now became the advanced level enough for the international society to pay attention. On the other hand, from having joined in ?onvention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage?in UNESCO in 2004, China accelerated the protection for the intangible cultural heritage by substituting the intangible cultural heritage for the name of the racial-private culture, which had been included in the existing culture protection law. Korea and China are the countries that are involved in the same Orient, but have mutually different protection background and real situation for intangible cultural heritages. Thus, through this research, it aimed to seek for the better protection policies for the intangible cultural heritages in two countries hereafter by analyzing the protection policies for the intangible cultural heritages in two countries and by grasping the characteristics of the protection policies for the intangible cultural heritages in two countries.
      This study analyzed the protection policy for the intangible cultural heritages in two countries after examining the present status of protection for the intangible cultural heritages in two countries, which are now being protected in the national dimension, based on the background and formation process of protection for the intangible cultural heritages in Korea and China.
      The protection policy for the intangible cultural heritage needs to be the one that aims to observe and keep, and to check the spirit of effective preservation and transmission. That is because the protection policy for the intangible cultural heritage should be the base manure as the policy, which can form the excellent spiritual culture in high-dimensional society.
      The 21st century is the one of culture. Amid globalization in which the restriction to time and space gradually disappears, each country is experiencing the culture war, with already having surpassed the culture competition. It is the so-called era of culture hegemony. In the midst of this flow, it tried to have the opportunity that inspects the protection policies for the intangible cultural heritages in both Korea and China, which show difference while having a close relationship geographically and historically. Especially in light of the reality that this research is not performed much, the more follow-up studies need to perform the deeper comparative analysis. And, this is thought to be capable of contributing not only to the development in own country? culture, but also to the development in world culture by offering new imagination to the global people.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-10-22 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Society for Dance Studies KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.51 0.51 0.53
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.51 0.52 0.698 0.29
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼