소비자-기업 가치공동창출활동의 개념화 및 척도개발에 관한 연구 = The Conceptualization and the Practical Application of Consumer-Business Co-creation of Value

국문 초록 (Abstract)

소비자와 기업의 관계는 부단히 진화하고 있다. 급변하는 시장 환경 속에서 소비자의 위상은 과거에 비해 높아졌고, 기업은 존속을 위하여 소비자지향적인 경영활동을 강화하는 추세이며, 소비자와 기업의 관계는 대립에서 상생의 관계로 변화되었다. 이러한 상황에서 소비자학은 소비자가 기업의 동반자로서 역할을 할 수 있는 구체적이고 실질적인 방안을 제시하고, 개별 소비자들이 이러한 역할을 수행할 수 있도록 여건을 조성해야 한다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 관계를 가능하게 하는 개념으로서 "소비자-기업 가치공동창출활동(Consumer-Business Co-creation of Value)"을 살펴보았고, 이를 소비자 가치창출활동과 기업 가치창출활동이 상품을 매개로 접목되고 선순환적으로 발전하는 전체적이고 유기적인 과정으로 확장하여 개념화 하였다. 또한 소비자-기업 가치공동창출활동의 수준을 직접 측정할 수 있는 척도를 개발하여 향후 소비자와 기업의 가치공동창출활동 수준을 확인할 수 있도록 하였다. 그 결과 소비자­기업 가치공동창출활동의 척도는 개념화에 근거하여 내용과 수행방식으로 구분하여 개발하였고 각각 35개 항목과 12개 항목을 최종 개발하여 검증하였다. 내용 척도의 경우 상품속성가치와 상품소비과정가치로 구분하였으며, 수행 방식은 소비자가 주도하는 소비자 Push 방식, 기업이 주도하는 기업 Pull 방식, 소비자간에 정보 공유를 주도하는 소비자 상호작용 방식으로 구분하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The concept of consumer-business collaboration is gaining importance in information society in which the notion of coexistence is critical. Several reasons could be behind the shift in paradigm from that of competition to that of collaboration between consumers and businesses. First driving force of such change can be found on consumer side. In the information age, consumers could access information that were not available to them before and they are able to modify, produce and share information with other consumers, and such informed consumers become empowered in the market. From business perspective, collaboration is essential element in business success and sustainability. In order to succeed and cope with fast changing market conditions, it is important for businesses to form partnership with consumers and feel the needs of consumers and respond to them in an appropriate and timely manner. What is the specific action plan for consumer-business collaboration? This study suggest that is "Consumer-Business co-creation of Value". Consumer-business co-creation of Value is useful not only to businesses but also to consumers in the sense it ultimately contributes to the realization of consumer sovereignty in the market. More specifically, where as the concept of dollar vote, a traditionally discussed means of realizing consumer sovereignty, has been criticized as being a remedial approach to what is already offered in the market, the potential of consumer-business co-creation of value lies in the possibility that consumers` needs and preferences can be communicated to businesses before the actual production happens, and thus making the distribution of social resources more ideal and effective by consumers. This paper propose to do the followings. First, I proposed to conceptualize ``Consumer-Business co-creation of value`` from consumer study`s point of view. Secondly, I proposed to develope the scale for consumer-business co-creation of value. I suggested the scale for co-creation value contents and the other being performance. In order to define consumer-business co-creation of value, it may be useful to take study the previous studies of co-creation into consideration. Great attention has been paid to the question of co-creation of value since 1979. However no one conceptualized the definition of consumer-business co-creation of value. Just Wikstrom(1996), Prahalad and Ramaswamy(2000, 2004), Vargo and Lusche(2004, 2006, 2008). Payne et al. (2008) had a comprehensive survey of consumer-business co-creation of value from both consumer and business perspectives. From these previous studies. I have extracted several ideas in order to conceptualize the consumer-business co-creation of value. They are consumer value creation process, business value creation process, the value to be able to co-create. In the Following, I tried to show the definition of Consumer-Business co-creation of value with regard to its significance to consumer, business, and market. "Consumer-Business Co-creation of Vale" can be explained through three processes. First, through experience, consumers discover new or additional values they desire in products. Then, business selectively choose and study certain values discovered by consumers in order to improve their products. Once the business proposes improved products which reflect the consumer`s ideas, consumers will likely choose to consume those products. Within this three-step process, consumer-business co-operate, and eventually exercise consumer-business co-creation of value activities. The fact that consumer sovereignty can realize before dollar-vote in the market is meaningful to consumer. From Business perspective, they can continue to exist through consumer dollar-vote. Last, if this process should happen everyday, the distribution of social resources will make more ideal. I focused more closely on developing the scale for measuring consumer-business co-creation of value, and to examining the real condition of consumer-business co-creation of value in Korea with respect to ongoing activity and perceived importance. Consumer-business co-creation of value can be measured two sides with one being value contents and the other being performance. The final value contents is composed of product attribute value, buying value, usage value, AS value, disposing value and can be dimensionalized by consumer`s problem solving level Consumer offer an opportunity to business to study their experience process. consumer identified problem of product through using process. Next dimension is problem solution suggestion by consumer, and last dimension is new idea suggestion. Performance Method is dimensionalized by two major axes, the subject and the object of consumer-business co-creation of value performance. They were named by consumer pushing way, consumers` interaction way, business pulling way. In order to consumer-business co-creation of value activity, the final Questionnaire with 35 Questions for value contents and 12 Questions for performance method. After the conceptualizing and developing the scales of consumer-business co-creation of value, I conducted the survey to measure the real conditions of consumer-business co-creation of value in Korea and I performed a confirmatory factor analysis in order to validate the scales of measurement.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 백혜란, "프로슈머의 개념화와 성향측정도구 개발" 한국소비자학회 20 (20): 135-161, 2009

2 김민주, "프로슈머를 활용한 기업 전략"

3 이규완, "커뮤니티 개설자에 대한 인식정도와 이용자의 커뮤니티 의식의 관계에 관한 연구:기업 개설형 브랜드 커뮤니티를 중심으로" 한국지역언론학회 6 (6): 378-414, 2006

4 홍두승, "제3판 사회조사분석" 다산출판사 2005

5 김주란, "인터넷 브랜드 커뮤니티에 대한 연구동향과 향후 연구방향 - 구조화이론에 입각한 통합적 분석 -" 한국마케팅관리학회 13 (13): 81-103, 2008

6 신유근, "인간존중의 경영: 조직행위론적 접근" 다산출판사 1997

7 나정호, "웹 커뮤니티 활동에 있어서의 성별 차이에 대한 연구 - 텍스트의 내용 분석 : 온라인 커뮤니티 게시글 중심으로" 한양대학교 경영대학원 2007

8 박유식, "온라인 브랜드커뮤니티 유형별 관계강도와 특성이 애호도에 미치는 영향" 충북대학교 산업경영연구소 19 (19): 35-58, 2007

9 이주희, "안티사이트를 통해 불매운동에 참가하게 되는 소비자들의 동기와 브랜드 이미지에 미치는 영향" 서울대학교 대학원 2005

10 서정희, "소비자주권에 관한 연구" 2 (2): 58-75, 1991

11 김병제, "소비자-브랜드 커뮤니티 관계 유형에 관한 연구" 한국항공경영학회 5 (5): 187-203, 2007

12 송희식, "소비자 주권과 경제적 민주주의"

13 임종원, "브랜드 커뮤니티 내 관계 심화 과정에 관한 연구 - 커뮤니티 경로와 브랜드 경로를 중심으로 -" 한국마케팅학회 24 (24): 203-230, 2009

14 박승환, "마케팅 원리와 전략" 도서출판 대경 2006

15 손관호, "마케팅" 삼영사 1999

16 양석준, "디지털 환경에서의 Reverse Marketing에 관한 연구 : 소비경험정보와 제품속성정보에 대한 고객의 정보 참여를 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2005

17 김기옥, "디지털 사회의 소비자정보론" 시그마프레스 2004

18 문숙재, "도시주부의 소비자불만족에 관한연구-전자밥통에 대한 불만족을 중심으로" 24 (24): 115-127, 1986

19 구혜경, "내용분석을 통한 기업 홈페이지 실태 연구 - 소비자정보제공과 의사소통을 중심으로 -" 대한가정학회 42 (42): 17-37, 2004

20 김주환, "구조방정식모형으로 논문 쓰기" 커뮤니케이션북스 2007

21 이민아, "고객참여를 통하여 축적된 정보가 고객 행동과 기업 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 온라인 커뮤니티를 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2005

22 김영신, "고객만족론" 한국학술정보 2008

23 조준일, "고객가치, 경험 사이클에서 찾아라 : 고객가치 창출 프레임웍"

24 이유재, "고객 만족을 넘어 고객 가치를경영하라" 21세기 북스 2007

25 이유재, "고객 만족 연구에 관한 종합적 고찰" 11 (11): 139-166, 2000

26 안웅, "경영학원론" 형설출판사 2002

27 박정현, "가상공동체에서의 소비자 정보활동과 소비자만족 연구 -인터넷 동호회를 중심으로-" 한국가정관리학회 20 (20): 139-149, 2002

28 구혜경, "“소비자 - 기업 협력”에 대한 탐색적 연구: 소비자 참여 마케팅 활동 사례의 비판적 고찰" 한국소비자학회 20 (20): 99-133, 2009

29 Fodness, Dale, "“From Customer to Competitor: Consumer Co-Option in the Service" 7 (7): 18-25, 1993

30 Grun, Thomas W., "eWOM : The Impact of Customer-to Customer Online Know- How Exchange on Customer Value and Loyalty" 59 (59): 449-456, 2005

31 Wikstrom, Solveig, "Value Creation by Company-Consumer Interaction" 12 (12): 359-374, 1996

32 Ramirez, Rafael, "Value Co-Production: Intellectual Origins and Implications for Practice and Research" 20 : 49-65, 1999

33 Jacoby, Jacob, "The Source, Meaning and Validity of Consumer Complaining Behavior: A Psychological Analysis" 57 (57): 4-24, 1981

34 Pini, Fabrizio Maria, "The Role of Customers in Interactive Co-Creation Practices: The Italian Scenario" 22 (22): 61-69, 2009

35 Nader, Ralph, "The Ralph Nader Reader" Seven Stories Press 2000

36 Fetter, Frank A., "The Principles of Eco nomics" The Century Company 1911

37 Mooney, Kelly, "The Open Brand" AIGA New Riders 2008

38 Hyman, Drew, "The Hierarchy of Consumer Participation and Patterns of Economic, Social, and Political Participation" 33 (33): 380-407, 1999

39 Bodker, Susanne, "The Design Collaboratorium : a place for usability design" 9 (9): 125-151, 2002

40 Forlizzi, Jodi, "The Building Blocks of Experience: An early framework for interaction designers" ACM 2000

41 Vargo, Stephen L, "Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing theRevolution" 36 : 1-10, 2008

42 Vargo, Stephen L, "Service Dominant Logic: What it is, What it is not, What it might be, In The Service dominant logic of marketing" Dialogue,debate and directions 43-56, 2006

43 Mueter, Matthew L, "Self-service Technologies: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters" 64 : 50-64, 2000

44 Bateson, J. E. G., "Self-Service Consumer : An Exploratory Study" 61 (61): 49-76, 1985

45 Bearden, William O, "Selected Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction and Complaint Reports" 20 : 21-28, 1983

46 Carmines, Edward G, "Reliability and Validity Assessment, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Application in the Social Sciences" Sage Publication 1979

47 Normann, Richard, "Reframing Business: When the map changes the landscape" Wiley 2001

48 Allen, C., "Reciprocal evolution as a strategy for integrantine basic research, design and studies of work practice"

49 Bendapudi, Neeli, "Psychological Implications of CustomerParticipation in Co-Production,”" 67 : 14-28, 2003

50 Mills, Peter K, "Motivating the Client/ Employee System as a Service Production Strategy" 8 (8): 301-310, 1983

51 Day, Ralph L., "Modeling Choices Among Alternative Response to Dissatisfaction" 11 : 496-499, 1984

52 Kotler, Philip, "Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 9th ed" Prentice Hall 1997

53 Payne, Adrian F, "Managing the co-creation of value" 136 : 83-96, 2008

54 Lovelock, Christopher H, "Look to Consumers to IncreaseProductivity" 57 : 168-178, 1979

55 Hamel, Gary, "Leading the Revolution" Harvard Business School 2002

56 Westbrook, Robert A., "Interpersonal Affective Influences on Consumer Satisfaction with Products" 7 : 49-54, 1980

57 Bickart, Barbara, "Internet Forums as Influential Source ofConsumer Information" 15 (15): 31-40, 2001

58 Sheth, Jagdish N, "Implcations of the Revised Definition of Marketing: From Exchange to Value Creation" 26 (26): 302-307, 2007

59 Dabholkar, Pratibha A., "How to Improve Perceived Service Quality by Improving Customer Participation, In Development in Marketing Science" Academy of Marketing Science 483-487, 1990

60 Day, Ralph L., "How Satisfactory is Research on Consumer Satisfaction?" 7 : 577-, 1980

61 Duncan, Tom, "How Integrated Marketing Communication's ‘Touch Point’ Can Operationalize the Service- Dominant Logic, In The Service dominant logic of marketing" Dialogue, debate and directions 236-244, 2006

62 Ellwood, Wayne, "Generating Power: A Guide to Consumer Organizing" IOCU 1984

63 Normann, Richard, "From Value Chain to Value Constellation:Designing Interactive Strategy" 71 : 65-77, 1993

64 나종연, "From Relationship to Partnership: Why CRM is giving way to CCV" 2009

65 Powell, John E., "Freedom and Reality" Right Way Books 1969

66 Gummesson, Evert, "Extending the Service- Dominant Logic: From customer centricity to balanced centricity" 36 : 15-17, 2008

67 Cain, John, "Experience Based Design: Towards a Science of Artful Business Innovation" (가을) : 10-16, 1998

68 Vargo, Stephen L, "Evolving to New Dominant Logic for Marketing" 68 : 1-17, 2004

69 Krishnan, S., "Dissatisfaction Attribution and Consumer Complaint Behavior" 6 : 445-449, 1979

70 Nambisan, Satish, "Designing Virtual Customer Environments for New Product Development: Toward a Theory" 27 (27): 392-413, 2002

71 Wind, Jerry, "Customerization: The Next Revolution in Mass Customization" 15 (15): 13-32, 2001

72 Strobacka, Kaj, "Customer relationship management: Creating Competitive advantage through win-win relationship strategies" McGraw-Hill 2001

73 Kalaignanam, Kartik, "Customer as Co-producers: Implications for Marketing Strategy Effectiveness and Marketing Operations Efficiency, In The Service dominant logic of marketing" Dialogue, debate and directions 166-180, 2006

74 Bettencourt, Lance A., "Customer Voluntary Performance : Customer as Partners in Service Delivery" 73 (73): 383-406, 1997

75 Woodruff, Robert B, "Customer Value: The Next Source for Competitive Advantage" 25 (25): 139-153, 1997

76 Holland, Jonna, "Customer Participation in Creating Site Brand Loyalty" 15 (15): 34-45, 2001

77 Schmitt, Bernd H., "Customer Experience Management" John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2003

78 Shaw, Deirdre, "Consumption as Voting: an explorationof consumer empowerment" 40 : 1049-1067, 2006

79 Dixon, Donald F., "Consumer sovereignty, democracy, and the marketing concept: a macromarketing perspective" 9 (9): 116-125, 1992

80 Fitzsimmons, James A., "Consumer Participation and Productivity in Service Operations" 15 (15): 60-67, 1985

81 Czepiel, Jhon A., "Consumer Dissatisfaction: Toward andIntergrative Framework" Proceeding ofAmerican Marketing Association 169-171, 1975

82 Singh, Jagdip, "Consumer Complaint Intentions and Behavior: Definitional and Taxonomical Issues" 93-107, 1988

83 Jaworski, Bernie, "Cocreating the Voice of the Customer, In The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing" Dialogue, debate and directions 109-117, 2006

84 Battarbee, Katja, "Co-experience: the Social User Experience" 2003

85 Oliver, Richard L., "Co-Producers and Co- Participants in the Satisfaction Process: Mutually satisfying consumption, In The Service dominant logic of marketing" Dialogue, debate and directions 118-127, 2006

86 Kambil, Ajit G, "Co-Creation: A new source ofvalue" (2) : 38-43, 1999

87 Prahalad, C. K, "Co- Opting Customer Competence" 79-87, 2000

88 Prahalad, C. K, "Co- Creation Experiences: The Next Practice in Value Creation" 18 (18): 5-14, 2004

89 Dabholkar, Pratibha A, "An Attitudinal Model of Technology-Based Self-Service: Moderating effects ofconsumer traits and situational factors" 30 (30): 184-201, 2002

90 Rechins, Marsha L., "An Analysis of Consumer Interaction Styles in Marketplace" 10 : 73-82, 1983

91 김계수, "AMOS 구조방정식 모형분석" SPSS아카 데미 2004

92 배병렬, "AMOS 17.0 구조방정식 리모델링-원리와 실제" 청람 2009

93 최지훈, "(The)Effects of motivational factors on knowledge sharing through blogs" 서울대학교 대학원 2009