한국어와 몽골어 비교 ~목적격조사 ‘을/를’ 중심으로 = A comparison between Korean objective proposition and Mongolian

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose of this work is to find out the differences and similarities of Accusative cases of Mongolian and Korean languages. Although many research works have been done on accusative cases of the two languages, the work on comparison of their meaning and functions hasn’t been started so far. I have worked to show the differences and functions of the languages comparing and explaining the brought examples from each languages. From this we can do the conclusion that in Korean language suffix of accusative case～reel is followed by vowel endings, suffix-eel followed by consonant endings. In Mongolian language suffixes of accusative case-iig, ～ii, ～g form nouns depending on that if the nouns are masculine or feminine and if the nouns have possessive meaning.
The similarities of the cases:
Accusative cases of the two languages both are manifested as: the direct object of predicate (action), the direction of action, the indirect object of action, quantity and orders related to the action, cognate object, object that indicate any modification (change), of actions some objects act tools or material, objects joined with the words that carry the meaning of time, objects combined with gerunds
Differences between the cases: the beginning of action, direction of action, the place that the action is being happened in, The place that the action is being directed to, results of action, the factor that makes (forces)the subject do the action, object that is being needed for having an action, some objects can be joined with auxiliary verbs, some objects that make clear the meaning of the nouns combining with adverbs, the objects with “say” or “tell” manifest that the objects were brought from other’s opinion, nouns can be the objects of verbs: speak, talk, ask as a meaning of about whom, objects can be used with words related to the profession.
In such ways we have tried to show the differences and similarities of these accusative cases. But we would like to continue our research work on this aspect widely.