2009년 12월 11일 한양대학교 법학연구소 학술대회 : 「주요법 개정의 현황과 문제점」-민법, 형법, 상법, 개정의 쟁점과 관련하여- ; 집행임원제도하의 임원보수 규제방안 -미국 경기부양법(Stimulus Bill)상의 임원보수 제한규정을 중심으로- = Research on How to Regulate Executive Compensation under Executive Officer System in Korea -Some Implications from compensation-related provisions under Stimulus Bill in U.S.-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this article, I analyze the executive compensation provision (§ 408-2(3)(6)) under the proposed revised version of 2008 Korean Commercial Code, and demonstrate its shortcomings in order to effectively regulate the compensation for executive officers under the proposed executive officer system in Korea. I also introduce the U.S. regulations which has been recently promulgated as a part of TARP to prevent excessive payments to poorly performed executives in U.S. publicly-held corporations, such as EESA, ARRA, and CFA. Among these regulations, my article focuses on the compensation-related provisions under ARRA which is affecting most of the TARP recipients under the U.S. stimulus plan. According to the ARRA, corporations which received a significant taxpayer fund under the TARP, must observe stricter compensation policies mandated under the ARRA, such as prohibition of certain types of compensation -bonuses, retention awards, incentive compensation, golden parachutes and luxury expenditures-, improved compensation committee requirements, Say-on-Pay and compensation clawback. Among these requirements, Say-on-Pay policy has been considered most effective method to curtail excessive executive compensation practices. Specifically, in the wake of recent financial crisis and global economic crisis, the growing public criticism on the incessant upward trend of executive compensation demands more fundamental remedy to curb compensation problems. Recognizing that there are several systemic flaws in current compensation system, such as lack of linkage between compensation and performance, executive`s short-termism, and lack of director`s accountability to shareholders, shareholder activists as well as many politicians have suggested the adoption of Say-on-Pay policies. After a full discussion on the details of the executive compensation provision under the proposed revised version of 2008 Korean Commercial Code (§ 408-2(3)(6)), I recommend that the Korean Commercial Code implement more detailed executive compensation provisions regarding compensation setting process and the disclosure of each executive`s detailed payments, not the total amounts paid to all directors and executives. In addition, after adopting a executive officer system in Korea, the Code should also maintain current compensation approval system in which shareholders should approve the compensation plan for directors with binding effect. Without the approval by shareholders, we may confront the same compensation crisis like the U.S. and Eurpope. Finally, I stress in this article that well-established executive compensation system would function as a fundamental basis to improve our corporate governance structure.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최문희, "理事의 報酬에 관한 規定의 檢討" 법학연구소 24 (24): 623-650, 2007

2 홍복기, "회사법강의" 법문사 2008

3 정찬형, "한국 주식회사에서의 집행임원에 관한 연구" 고려대학교법학연구원 43 : 2004

4 차대운, "집행임원제도의 도입필요성과 입법론적 과제" 한국상장회사협의회 49 : 2004

5 양만식, "집행임원제도의 도입에 따른 지배구조론의 전개" 한국상사법학회 24 (24): 177-231, 2005

6 양동석, "집행임원제도의 도입에 따른 법률문제" 한국상사법학회 20 (20): 2001

7 홍복기, "주식회사에 있어서 집행임원제도의 도입과 그 과제" 한국상사판례학회 19 (19): 89-120, 2006

8 문상일, "任員報酬制度의 改革 -미국의 株主承認權(Say-on-Pay) 제도를 중심으로-" 한국상사법학회 28 (28): 411-440, 2009

9 Ben White, "What Red Ink? Wall Street Paid Hefty Bonuses" 2009

10 Matthew Ericson, "Tracking the $700 Billion Bailout" 2009

11 Bengt Holmstrom, "The State of U.S. Corporate Governance: What’s Right and What’s Wrong?" 15 : 2003

12 Randall S. Thomas, "The Effect of Shareholder Proposals on Executive Compensation" 67 : 1999

13 "Shareholder Vote on Executive Compensation Act, S. 1181, 110th Cong."

14 "Shareholder Bill of Rights Act of 2009, S. 1074, 111th Cong."

15 Fabrizio Ferri & David A. Maber, "Say on Pay Votes and CEO Compensation: Evidence from the U.K."

16 "Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Pub. L. No. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745"

17 "Press Release, U.S. Dep’t of Treasury, TARP Standards for Compensation and Corporate Governance, 31 CFR Part 30, June 15"

18 "Press Release, SEC, Former UnitedHealth Group CEO/Chairman Settles Stock Options Backdating Case for $468 Million"

19 Lucian Bebchuk, "Pay without Performance; The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive compensation" Harvard University Press 2004

20 Lucian Arye Bebchuk, "Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem" 17 : 2003

21 "Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, Pub. L. No. 110-343, 122 Stat. 3765"

22 Stephen M. Bainbridge, "Director Primacy and Shareholder Disempowerment" 119 : 2006

23 "Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009, H.R. 3269, 111th Cong"

24 Charles R.T. O’Kelley, "Cases and Materials, 5th ed" Thompson, Corporations and Other Business Associations 2006

25 Ivan E. Brick, Oded Palmon & John K. Wald, "CEO Compensation, Director Compensation, and Firm Performance: Evidence of Cronyism"

26 "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Pub. L. No. 111-5, 123 Stat 11"