RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Spatial allocation mechanism of venture capital invested in China : role of the regional legal system

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14509505

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Abstract
      Spatial Allocation Mechanism of Venture Capital Invested in China
      - Role of the Regional Legal System –
      Xiao Wei Jin
      Department of Geography
      The Graduate School
      Seoul National University

      Through the empirical research of venture capital investment in China from 1992 to 2012, this paper examines the mechanism of the regional legal systems’ influence on geographical distribution of venture capital and further explores the implications of geography in the capital allocation process.
      Four sub-questions and corresponding research issues were deduced from the above main research object and the research was conducted as follows, namely: (1) the study of the characteristics of venture capital spatial allocation patterns, (2) the interpretation of the reason and process of the venture capital spatial allocation phenomenon, (3) the mechanism of the regional legal systems’ influence on venture capital spatial allocation, and (4) the implication of geography in the capital allocation process.
      Three analysis tools, i.e., the correlation analysis, the qualitative interpretation of legal provisions, and game theory based analysis, were used to discuss the above questions. The corresponding sub-conclusions can be summarized as follows.
      Firstly, there are two features of the geographical patterns of venture capital spatial allocation, i.e., the geographical separation of business operation location vs legally registered addresses, and the capital cycle division being scattered into different locations. The phenomenon where the registration location is separated from the actual place of business operation appears in all stages of venture capital investment cycle, namely, fund raising, establishment, investment, and exit. And within the same investment cycle, these four stages are often allocated in different geographical locations. There are three patterns of the capital allocation. The first pattern is the ‘head-tail outside pattern,’ which dominated before 2000. In this pattern the fundraising, registration, and exiting locations are all located outside China, while only the investment activity remained within China. The second pattern is the ‘mix location pattern,’ which means venture capitalist chose to locate the stages in a mixed way according to specific objectives and cases. This pattern appeared most during 2001-2006. The third pattern, which dominated after 2007, is the ‘all stage bake in situ pattern’ where all stages returned to the registration location inside China.
      Second, after confirming that legislation has a strong correlation with the above phenomenon by correlation analysis, the qualitative analysis of the legal provision reveals that extra costs caused by law is the fundamental cause for the above phenomenon. Specifically, there always exists a mismatch between regional economic and legislation signals, thus incurs an extra costs or benefit caused by law. To minimize the extra costs or obtain the extra benefit from the regional legal system, venture capitals take the advantage of the scope feature of law and the divisible feature of capital to split the venture investment cycle into parts and allocate it into different locations.
      Third, the mechanism of legal impact on venture capital spatial allocation is virtually a game between the government and enterprises that choose different strategies as regards to law and location to maximize their own profits. The ‘hidden costs’ caused by the local legal system and the nature of pursuing maximized corporate income is the fundamental principle and trigger of the mechanism.
      Fourth, there is a dual role of geography in the process of capital spatial allocation, i.e., the role of ‘place’ and ‘space’.
      In the process of legally influenced capital spatial allocation, when enterprise choose to change their legal status to bypass the law, the actual business operation location and the firm’s registration location still remain within the region. This is because the extra benefits that it derives from the inherent attributes of the region are greater than the extra costs that are caused by the regional legal systems. The inherent attributes including the informal institutions - history, culture, customs, norms, moral, religious constrains of the region - as well as other attributes that are embedded in the region such as the external economic benefits and social networks are ones that the region may supply to the firm. In this case, the region is an irreplaceable ‘place’ for the firm.
      On the contrary, when ‘hidden costs’ caused by law exceed the extra benefits provided by the inherent attributes of the region, the firm will separate the registration location from the actual business operation location for the sake of survival and development. The pro forma legal registration address will be placed in an indiscriminate ‘space’ that is concerned only with the location as a legal factor for the firm. In other words, in this case, the newly chosen location for the detached registration address is merely an indiscriminate legal space for the firm.

      In short, the regional legal system affects the capital spatial allocation through a dual mechanism, that is, explicit regulations on economic behaviors and implicit influence on the comprehensive income of the firm. Geography has two implications in this dual mechanism: One, when the impact of the regional legal system on the activity and comprehensive income of the firm is less than the benefits it gains from the regional inherence attributes, the region is an irreplaceable ‘place’ for the firm, Otherwise, the corresponding region will merely be an indiscriminate legal ‘space’.
      번역하기

      Abstract Spatial Allocation Mechanism of Venture Capital Invested in China - Role of the Regional Legal System – Xiao Wei Jin Department of Geography The Graduate School Seoul National University Through the empirical research of venture capital i...

      Abstract
      Spatial Allocation Mechanism of Venture Capital Invested in China
      - Role of the Regional Legal System –
      Xiao Wei Jin
      Department of Geography
      The Graduate School
      Seoul National University

      Through the empirical research of venture capital investment in China from 1992 to 2012, this paper examines the mechanism of the regional legal systems’ influence on geographical distribution of venture capital and further explores the implications of geography in the capital allocation process.
      Four sub-questions and corresponding research issues were deduced from the above main research object and the research was conducted as follows, namely: (1) the study of the characteristics of venture capital spatial allocation patterns, (2) the interpretation of the reason and process of the venture capital spatial allocation phenomenon, (3) the mechanism of the regional legal systems’ influence on venture capital spatial allocation, and (4) the implication of geography in the capital allocation process.
      Three analysis tools, i.e., the correlation analysis, the qualitative interpretation of legal provisions, and game theory based analysis, were used to discuss the above questions. The corresponding sub-conclusions can be summarized as follows.
      Firstly, there are two features of the geographical patterns of venture capital spatial allocation, i.e., the geographical separation of business operation location vs legally registered addresses, and the capital cycle division being scattered into different locations. The phenomenon where the registration location is separated from the actual place of business operation appears in all stages of venture capital investment cycle, namely, fund raising, establishment, investment, and exit. And within the same investment cycle, these four stages are often allocated in different geographical locations. There are three patterns of the capital allocation. The first pattern is the ‘head-tail outside pattern,’ which dominated before 2000. In this pattern the fundraising, registration, and exiting locations are all located outside China, while only the investment activity remained within China. The second pattern is the ‘mix location pattern,’ which means venture capitalist chose to locate the stages in a mixed way according to specific objectives and cases. This pattern appeared most during 2001-2006. The third pattern, which dominated after 2007, is the ‘all stage bake in situ pattern’ where all stages returned to the registration location inside China.
      Second, after confirming that legislation has a strong correlation with the above phenomenon by correlation analysis, the qualitative analysis of the legal provision reveals that extra costs caused by law is the fundamental cause for the above phenomenon. Specifically, there always exists a mismatch between regional economic and legislation signals, thus incurs an extra costs or benefit caused by law. To minimize the extra costs or obtain the extra benefit from the regional legal system, venture capitals take the advantage of the scope feature of law and the divisible feature of capital to split the venture investment cycle into parts and allocate it into different locations.
      Third, the mechanism of legal impact on venture capital spatial allocation is virtually a game between the government and enterprises that choose different strategies as regards to law and location to maximize their own profits. The ‘hidden costs’ caused by the local legal system and the nature of pursuing maximized corporate income is the fundamental principle and trigger of the mechanism.
      Fourth, there is a dual role of geography in the process of capital spatial allocation, i.e., the role of ‘place’ and ‘space’.
      In the process of legally influenced capital spatial allocation, when enterprise choose to change their legal status to bypass the law, the actual business operation location and the firm’s registration location still remain within the region. This is because the extra benefits that it derives from the inherent attributes of the region are greater than the extra costs that are caused by the regional legal systems. The inherent attributes including the informal institutions - history, culture, customs, norms, moral, religious constrains of the region - as well as other attributes that are embedded in the region such as the external economic benefits and social networks are ones that the region may supply to the firm. In this case, the region is an irreplaceable ‘place’ for the firm.
      On the contrary, when ‘hidden costs’ caused by law exceed the extra benefits provided by the inherent attributes of the region, the firm will separate the registration location from the actual business operation location for the sake of survival and development. The pro forma legal registration address will be placed in an indiscriminate ‘space’ that is concerned only with the location as a legal factor for the firm. In other words, in this case, the newly chosen location for the detached registration address is merely an indiscriminate legal space for the firm.

      In short, the regional legal system affects the capital spatial allocation through a dual mechanism, that is, explicit regulations on economic behaviors and implicit influence on the comprehensive income of the firm. Geography has two implications in this dual mechanism: One, when the impact of the regional legal system on the activity and comprehensive income of the firm is less than the benefits it gains from the regional inherence attributes, the region is an irreplaceable ‘place’ for the firm, Otherwise, the corresponding region will merely be an indiscriminate legal ‘space’.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Chapter 1 Introduction 1
      • 1.1 Background and Research Objectives 1
      • 1.1.1 Research Background 1
      • 1.1.2 Research Objective 11
      • 1.2 Data and Methodology 13
      • Chapter 1 Introduction 1
      • 1.1 Background and Research Objectives 1
      • 1.1.1 Research Background 1
      • 1.1.2 Research Objective 11
      • 1.2 Data and Methodology 13
      • 1.2.1 Data 13
      • 1.2.2 Methodology 21
      • 1.3 Framework of the Dissertation 24
      • Chapter 2 Literature Review 27
      • 2.1 Researches on Spatial Allocation of Capital 27
      • 2.1.1 Enterprise management on Capital Allocation 27
      • 2.1.2 Regional Governance on Capital Allocation 33
      • 2.2 Role of Legislation on Spatial Allocation of Venture Capital 38
      • 2.2.1 Location strategies of The Venture Capital Industry 38
      • 2.2.2 Games between Governments and Enterprises 41
      • 2.2.3 Analyses Framework 44
      • Chapter 3 The Emergence and Development of The Venture Capital Industry 46
      • 3.1 The Development of Global Venture Capital Industries and Legal Systems 46
      • 3.1.1 The Development of Global Venture Capital Industries 46
      • 3.1.2 The Development of Legal Systems for Global Venture Capital Industries 50
      • 3.2 The Development of Venture Capital Industries and Legal Systems in China 55
      • 3.2.1 Non-legal Environment for Development of Venture Capital in China 55
      • 3.2.2 Legal Environment for the development of VC in China 59
      • Chapter 4 Legal Impact on VCs Geographical Patterns of Capital Allocation 65
      • 4.1 Correlation Analysis of VC Capital Allocation and Legal System 65
      • 4.1.1 Transition of the Geographical Patterns of the Venture Capital Investment in China 66
      • 4.1.2 Correlation between Legal Systems and Geographical Patterns of Venture Capital Allocation 69
      • 4.2 Legal Impact on Geographical Allocation of VC Capital 75
      • 4.2.1 Legal Impact on Fundraising Stage 76
      • 4.2.2 Legal Impact on Registration Stage 87
      • 4.2.3 Legal Impact on Investment Stage 95
      • 4.2.4 Legal Impact on Exiting Stage 103
      • 4.3 Analysis of causes of legal impact on capital spatial allocation 108
      • 4.3.1 Role of the mismatch between economic environment and legal environment 108
      • 4.3.2 Role of the category characteristics of legislation and the detachable characteristics of capital 111
      • 4.4 Summary 115
      • Chapter 5 Game Analysis of Legal Impact on Venture Capital Spatial Allocation 119
      • 5.1 Modeling of the Game 119
      • 5.1.1 Background Statement 119
      • 5.1.2 Components of the Legal vs Capital Game 122
      • 5.1.3 Description of the Legal vs Capital Game 126
      • 5.2 Game Analysis and Interpretations 132
      • 5.2.1 Analysis Results 132
      • 5.2.2 Interpretation by Case Study 137
      • 5.3 Summary 150
      • Chapter 6 Conclusion 154
      • Appendix 1 Venture Capital Legal Systems of China 164
      • Appendix 2 Venture Capital Legal Systems of China (Chinese Version) 177
      • Appendix 3 Coding Method for Legal Documents 190
      • References 195
      • 국문초록 213
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1. [공지음], 김재진, 서울: 서울 : 한국조세연구원, , 2000

      2. 벤처캐피탈 지원제도의 국제비교와 정책방향, 김진수, 한국조세연구원, , 2000

      1. [공지음], 김재진, 서울: 서울 : 한국조세연구원, , 2000

      2. 벤처캐피탈 지원제도의 국제비교와 정책방향, 김진수, 한국조세연구원, , 2000

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼