RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      最近韓國儒敎硏究的現狀和展望 = Recent tendency and Prospect of Confucian Studies in Korea

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The modernization of Confucianism is the most active among fields of Confucian Studies in Korea. Modernization of Confucianism in Korea is distinctive from that of other countries in involvement of Confucian philosophers as well as social scientists. While Confucian philosophers attempt to reformulate Confucianism criticizing obsolete part of it and discover a post-modern answer in Confucianism , social scientists try to put fingers on Confucian factors of social development in East Asia and use Confucianism for establishing new paradigm of social science. In other words, Confucian philosophers focus on revitalizing Confucianism while social scientists pursue new social science. As on the part of Confucian scholars, knowledge of modem social sciences is insufficient; social scientists that do not have deep understanding of Confucianism often show lack of proper knowledge and even distort some Confucian doctrines. Yet interdisciplinary cooperation between Confucian philosophers and social scientists will remedy defects and flourish in the future. Toegye, Yulgok, Dasan, and Hyegang have been the favorite thinkers for researchers of Korean Confucianism, which continues for a while. Yet studies on newly discovered Confucian scholars will increase in near future. As studies on Confucianism of early Joseon era have accumulated, those of late Joseon can be augmenting in the future. Studies on Chinese philosophies will keep its pace, while comparative studies on Chinese philosophy can be increased because many scholars trained in western institutions is on the rise. Interests regarding Japanese philosophy, even slowly increasing, can be seen among scholars. East Asian perspective in Humanism, advocated by scholars mainly in Sungkyunkwan University, becomes active recent years. It insists pan-East Asian perspective overcoming national boundaries is needed for deeper understanding of East Asian culture. For Confucian studies, East Asian perspective not being reflected so far can be adopted for further studies. For example, comparative study on commentaries of Confucian classics looks prospective enhancing collaborations among international scholars.
      번역하기

      The modernization of Confucianism is the most active among fields of Confucian Studies in Korea. Modernization of Confucianism in Korea is distinctive from that of other countries in involvement of Confucian philosophers as well as social scientists. ...

      The modernization of Confucianism is the most active among fields of Confucian Studies in Korea. Modernization of Confucianism in Korea is distinctive from that of other countries in involvement of Confucian philosophers as well as social scientists. While Confucian philosophers attempt to reformulate Confucianism criticizing obsolete part of it and discover a post-modern answer in Confucianism , social scientists try to put fingers on Confucian factors of social development in East Asia and use Confucianism for establishing new paradigm of social science. In other words, Confucian philosophers focus on revitalizing Confucianism while social scientists pursue new social science. As on the part of Confucian scholars, knowledge of modem social sciences is insufficient; social scientists that do not have deep understanding of Confucianism often show lack of proper knowledge and even distort some Confucian doctrines. Yet interdisciplinary cooperation between Confucian philosophers and social scientists will remedy defects and flourish in the future. Toegye, Yulgok, Dasan, and Hyegang have been the favorite thinkers for researchers of Korean Confucianism, which continues for a while. Yet studies on newly discovered Confucian scholars will increase in near future. As studies on Confucianism of early Joseon era have accumulated, those of late Joseon can be augmenting in the future. Studies on Chinese philosophies will keep its pace, while comparative studies on Chinese philosophy can be increased because many scholars trained in western institutions is on the rise. Interests regarding Japanese philosophy, even slowly increasing, can be seen among scholars. East Asian perspective in Humanism, advocated by scholars mainly in Sungkyunkwan University, becomes active recent years. It insists pan-East Asian perspective overcoming national boundaries is needed for deeper understanding of East Asian culture. For Confucian studies, East Asian perspective not being reflected so far can be adopted for further studies. For example, comparative study on commentaries of Confucian classics looks prospective enhancing collaborations among international scholars.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-12-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 國際版<儒敎文化硏究> -> Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
      KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-06-13 학회명변경 영문명 : Institute of Confucian Cultural Studies -> Institute of Confucian Philosophy and Culture KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.1 0.08
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.06 0.04 0.351 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼