RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Featured Articles : Representing Islam, Terrorism, and Violence ; An American Reflection: Steven Spielberg, The Jewish Holocaust and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict = Featured Articles : Representing Islam, Terrorism, and Violence ; An American Reflection: Steven Spielberg, The Jewish Holocaust and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82648725

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper examines Steven Spielberg`s vision of the State of Israel and, to a lesser extend of the U.S., as presented in Munich (2005). The paper argues that Spielberg mounts a critique of the two states and their security apparatuses. The willingness of the two to resort to violence either in the name of their own protection or under the guise of protecting their citizens, Munich suggests, does not merely undercut their claim as democracies to embody the universal values of liberty and justice, but also the very well-being of their citizens. Spielberg`s mistrust of the state (and of the State of Israel in particular) is already hesitantly suggested more than a decade earlier in his treatment of the Jewish Holocaust in Schindler`s List (1993). I trace this mistrust to two cinematic sources: Otto Preminger`s Exodus (1960) and Laurence Jarvik`s Who Shall Live and Who Shall Die (1982). Whereas the former Hollywood epic sought to align American audiences with the State of Israel and its military campaigns, the latter documentary exposed the inaction of both the Roosevelt administration and the Zionist leadership in the face of the mass murder of European Jews during World War II. Spielberg`s films could thus be seen as a revision-both in plot and in form-of Preminger`s spectacular celebration of the State of Israel in light of Jarvik`s damning revelations. Exodus turns the story of the rise of Israel out of the plight of Holocaust survivors into "spectacular cinema." Spielberg`s films, on the other hand, and Munich in particular, suggest that spectacular cinema conceals the incommensurability between the plight of individuals and the logic that guides the action of the state and its apparatuses. In that respect, Spielberg`s films-considered prime examples of the latest incarnation of spectacular cinema-undercut their own logic of representation.
      번역하기

      This paper examines Steven Spielberg`s vision of the State of Israel and, to a lesser extend of the U.S., as presented in Munich (2005). The paper argues that Spielberg mounts a critique of the two states and their security apparatuses. The willingnes...

      This paper examines Steven Spielberg`s vision of the State of Israel and, to a lesser extend of the U.S., as presented in Munich (2005). The paper argues that Spielberg mounts a critique of the two states and their security apparatuses. The willingness of the two to resort to violence either in the name of their own protection or under the guise of protecting their citizens, Munich suggests, does not merely undercut their claim as democracies to embody the universal values of liberty and justice, but also the very well-being of their citizens. Spielberg`s mistrust of the state (and of the State of Israel in particular) is already hesitantly suggested more than a decade earlier in his treatment of the Jewish Holocaust in Schindler`s List (1993). I trace this mistrust to two cinematic sources: Otto Preminger`s Exodus (1960) and Laurence Jarvik`s Who Shall Live and Who Shall Die (1982). Whereas the former Hollywood epic sought to align American audiences with the State of Israel and its military campaigns, the latter documentary exposed the inaction of both the Roosevelt administration and the Zionist leadership in the face of the mass murder of European Jews during World War II. Spielberg`s films could thus be seen as a revision-both in plot and in form-of Preminger`s spectacular celebration of the State of Israel in light of Jarvik`s damning revelations. Exodus turns the story of the rise of Israel out of the plight of Holocaust survivors into "spectacular cinema." Spielberg`s films, on the other hand, and Munich in particular, suggest that spectacular cinema conceals the incommensurability between the plight of individuals and the logic that guides the action of the state and its apparatuses. In that respect, Spielberg`s films-considered prime examples of the latest incarnation of spectacular cinema-undercut their own logic of representation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Weissbrod, Rachel, "‘Exodus’ as a Zionist Melodrama" (1) : 129-152, 1999

      2 Brooks, David, "What ‘Munich’ left out"

      3 Goldberg, Michelle, "The War on ‘Munich’"

      4 Doneson,Judith, "The Holocaust in American film,2nd ed." Syracuse University Press 2002

      5 Bresheeth, Haim, "The Great Taboo Broken: Reflections on the Israeli Reception of Schindler’s List. In Spielberg’s Holocaust: Critical Perspectives on Schindler’s List" Bloomington: Indiana University Press 193-212, 1997

      6 Beinart, Peter, "The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment"

      7 Freer, Ian, "The Complete Spielberg" London: Virgin 2001

      8 Morris,Nigel, "The Cinema of Steven Spielberg:Empire of Light" London:Wallflower 2007

      9 Friedman, Lester D, "Steven Spielberg: Interviews" Jackson: University of Mississippi Press 2000

      10 Schoenfeld, Gabriel, "Spielberg’s ‘Munich.’"

      1 Weissbrod, Rachel, "‘Exodus’ as a Zionist Melodrama" (1) : 129-152, 1999

      2 Brooks, David, "What ‘Munich’ left out"

      3 Goldberg, Michelle, "The War on ‘Munich’"

      4 Doneson,Judith, "The Holocaust in American film,2nd ed." Syracuse University Press 2002

      5 Bresheeth, Haim, "The Great Taboo Broken: Reflections on the Israeli Reception of Schindler’s List. In Spielberg’s Holocaust: Critical Perspectives on Schindler’s List" Bloomington: Indiana University Press 193-212, 1997

      6 Beinart, Peter, "The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment"

      7 Freer, Ian, "The Complete Spielberg" London: Virgin 2001

      8 Morris,Nigel, "The Cinema of Steven Spielberg:Empire of Light" London:Wallflower 2007

      9 Friedman, Lester D, "Steven Spielberg: Interviews" Jackson: University of Mississippi Press 2000

      10 Schoenfeld, Gabriel, "Spielberg’s ‘Munich.’"

      11 Bartov, Omer, "Spielberg’s Oskar: Hollywood Tries Evil, In Spielberg’s Holocaust: Critical Perspectives on Schindler’s List" Bloomington: Indiana University Press 41-60, 1997

      12 Loshitzky, Yosefa, "Spielberg’s Holocaust: Critical Perspectives on Schindler’s List" Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1997

      13 Wasser,Frederick, "Spielberg’s America" Cambridge: Polity 2010

      14 Schickel, Richard, "Spielberg Takes On Terror"

      15 King,Geoff, "Spectacular Narratives:Hollywood in the Age of the Blockbuster" London: I. B. Tauris 2000

      16 Hansen, Miriam Bratu, "Schindler’s List Is Not Shoah: Second Commandment, Popular Modernism, and Public Memory, In Spielberg’s Holocaust: Critical Perspectives on Schindler’s List" Bloomington: Indiana University Press 77-103, 1997

      17 Ebert, Roger, "Review of Munich"

      18 Baron, Lawrence, "Projecting the Holocaust into the Present: The Changing Focus of Contemporary Holocaust Cinema" Rowman & Littlefield 2005

      19 Mintz,Alan, "Popular Culture and the Shaping of Holocaust Memory in America" Seattle: University of Washington Press 2001

      20 Schiller, Friedrich, "On Naïve and Sentimental Poetry, In Essays" Continuum 179-260, 1993

      21 Insdorf,Annette, "Indelible Shadows:Film and the Holocaust,3rd ed" Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press 2003

      22 Loshitzky, Yosefa, "Identity Politics on the Israeli screen" University of Texas Press 2001

      23 Wieseltier, Leon, "Hits"

      24 Almagor, Dan, "Eikh nolad ha-shir ‘yerushalayim shel zahav.’" 75 (75): 14-16, 1996

      25 Biskind,Peter, "Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex-drugs-and-rock-‘n’-roll Generation Saved Hollywood" New York: Simon & Schuster 1998

      26 Buckland, Warren, "Directed by Steven Spielberg: poetics of the contemporary Hollywood blockbuster" New York: Continuum 2006

      27 Ansen, David, "Catch and Kill Them If You Can" 2005

      28 Canby, Vincent, "American Roles during the Holocaust"

      29 Hirsch, Joshua, "Afterimage: Film, Trauma, and the Holocaust" Philadelphia:Temple University Press 2004

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.1 0.16
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.13 0.09 0.443 0.07
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼