도식적 기저유출분리기법의 적용에 관한 사례 연구 = Case study on application of graphical method for baseflow separation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Baseflow constitutes most of the streamflow during the dry season and it is an important factor for stream management. In this study, four techniques for separating baseflow from the streamflow were applied to two target areas to examine the applicability. The baseflow separation techniques used in the analysis are all graphical methods, which are fixed interval method (FIM), sliding interval method (SIM), local minimum method (LMM), and PART programs based on the N-day method. The target areas are the Daeri and Cheongsong stage stations in the Nakdong River Basin where the streamflow was measured continuously for 5 years. We evaluated the appropriateness of the results for baseflow separation methods by examining the indexes for model assessment (NSE, PBIAS, RSR), baseflow index, and shape of baseflow separated from a flood hydrograph. It was analyzed that the FIM, SIM, and LMM methods included some errors in separating the baseflow from streamflow, whereas the PART program results were found to be the best.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

유역의 기저유량은 갈수기 하천유량의 대부분을 차지하므로 하천 관리에 있어 중요한 요소이다. 이 연구에서는 하천유량으로부터 기저유량을 분리하는 4가지의 기저유출분리기법을 2개의 대표 지점에 적용하여 적용성을 검토하였다. 분석에 사용된 기저유출분리기법은 모두 도식적 방법으로서, N-day법에 근거한 FIM, SIM, LMM 기법과 PART 프로그램이다. 적용된 지역은 다년간 연속적으로 유량이 측정된 낙동강 유역의 대리 수위관측소 및 청송 수위관측소이다. 기법별 모형평가지표(NSE, PBIAS, RSR), 기저유출지표, 홍수 수문곡선으로부터 분리된 기저유량의 형상을 검토하여 기저유출 분리 결과의 적절성을 평가하였다. FIM, SIM, LMM 기법은 기저유출 분리 시 오류를 일부 포함하고 있는 것으로 분석되었고, 상대적으로 PART 프로그램에 의한 기저유출 분리 결과가 가장 우수한 것으로 나타났다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 홍지영, "한강수계의 하천에 대한 직접유출과 기저유출의 기여도 정량화" 한국수자원학회 48 (48): 309-319, 2015

2 이승찬, "다양한 기저유출 분리 방법을 이용한 4대강 수계의 시간대별 (연･계절･월) 기저유출 기여도 분석" 한국농공학회 59 (59): 1-11, 2017

3 한정호, "낙동강 수계에서의 하천유량 변동성과 기저유출 기여도의 관계 분석" 한국농공학회 58 (58): 27-38, 2016

4 강형식, "국내 하천 기저유출지표 산정 및 도시화에 따른 기저유출 영향 분석" 한국수자원학회 52 (52): 97-105, 2019

5 Ministry of Environment(ME), "The 2nd master plan for water environment management" 2015

6 Kang, H.S, "Study on the development and implementation of baseflow index for the management of groundwater dependent ecosystems. 2015-12" Korea Environment Institute 7-, 2015

7 Moriasi, D. N., "Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations" 50 (50): 885-900, 2007

8 Lee, J. S., "Hydrology" Goomibook 2015

9 Sloto, R.A., "HYSEP: A computer program for streamflow hydrograph separation and analysis" U.S. Geological Survey 1996

10 Xie, J., "Evaluation of typical methods for baseflow separation in the contiguous United States" 583 : 124628-, 2020

11 He, S., "Contribution of baseflow nitrate export to non-point source pollution" 59 (59): 1912-1929, 2016

12 Rutledge, A.T., "Computer programs for describing the recession of ground-water discharge and for estimating mean groundwater recharge and discharge from streamflow data-update" U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations 1998

13 Lott, D. A., "Base flow separation: A comparison of analytical and mass balance methods" 535 : 525-533, 2016

14 Gregor, M., "BFI+ 3.0 user’s manual"

15 Lim, K. J., "Automated web GIS based hydrograph analysis tool, WHAT 1" 41 (41): 1407-1416, 2005

16 Arnold, J. G., "Automated methods for estimating baseflow and ground water recharge from streamflow records" 35 (35): 411-424, 1999

17 Liu, Z., "Application of a digital filter method to separate baseflow in the small watershed of Pengchongjian in Southern China" 10 (10): 1065-, 2019

18 Lee, S., "An operational model of a reservoir system simulation for real-time flood control in the Han River Basin" 10 (10): 499-510, 2017

19 Eckhardt, K, "A comparison of baseflow indices, which were calculated with seven different baseflow separation methods" 352 : 168-173, 2008