역사교과서 문제의 교재화와 학습자의 인식 = Making teaching of the conflict concerned history textbooks and A student’s perception

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the autumn 2008, Korean history education was confused by a conflict of Korean modern and contemporary history textbooks that have been approved officially. The Ministry of Education, Science and Technology and the ruling party urged the history textbook writers and publishing companies to modify description. They have insisted the history textbooks were written in the left wing way and unsuitable as the textbook for education. The history textbook writers were against the demand of the ministry and nearly 1,300 history educators, who included scholars and teachers in public school, insisted on a discontinuance of the history textbook’s modification that destroys a speciality of the history science and a political neutrality of education.
The conflict of history textbooks has indicated the difference in perspective about different explanations of historical facts and a textbook for teaching. The similar conflict has occurred to Japan. This article tried to show the case of Saburo Ienaga who had sued the government for politically correct history textbook for 32 years and Nobuyoshi Takasima who has sued for the same aim for 13 years.
The conflict of Korea and Japan have been occurred by the difference in perspective about a textbook. This article tried to put a role of a textbook that has been based on the 7th curriculum and a role of textbook that comes from the groups who have urged to modify Korean modern and contemporary history textbooks in order.
At the end, this article wrote the perception of the students who had taken the class about the conflict of history textbooks. The aims of the class were to know history textbooks have different history explanations and to know a history textbook was written by one of history explanations about historic facts. After that, the students described the perception about the conflict of history textbooks. The students formed their opinion about the conflict. For the students, it is dangerous to modify a history textbook by political aims, a history textbook is one of sources for a class, the contents of a history textbook can be chosen by history educators, and the students can conclude historical perception.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 들어가며
• Ⅰ. 정치권력과 역사교과서
• Ⅱ. 역사교과서 문제의 교재화와 학습자의 인식양상
• 맺으며
• 【Abstract】

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이신철, "한국사 교과서 속의 ‘북한’, 그리고 통일을 향한 민족사 서술 모색" 한국사 교과서의 희망을 찾아서 313-324, 2003

2 "한국 근·현대사 집필자협의회 참가교수 일동이 발표한" 한국 근·현대사 교과서 집필진 성명서 2008

3 "한겨레신문·경향신문, 2008년 11월 3일"

4 "한겨레신문, 2008년 11월 11일"

5 "한겨레신문, 2005년 12월 1일"

6 노마필드, "죽어가는 천황의 나라에서" 창작과비평사 1995

7 "조선일보, 2008년 10월 17일"

8 "조선일보, 2007년 10월 2일"

9 PD수첩 794회, "정권이 바뀌면 교과서도 바뀐다?"

10 정재정, "일본의 논리" 민음사 50-60, 1998

11 다카시마 노부요시, "일본의 군국주의적 정치세력과의 대결을 교과서문제에서 생각한다" 한·중·일 역사인식과 일본교과서 2002

12 김현철, "오끼나와전의 ‘집단자결’ 관련 일본역사교과서 검정과 최근 동향"

13 허동현, "역사왜곡에 맞서 싸운 이에나가 사부로(家永三郞)" 종합학술대회자료집:광복60, 새로운 시작 2005

14 김한종, "역사교육의 교재" 역사교육의 내용과 방법 134-137, 2007

15 송상헌, "역사교육에서 바라본 역사교과서 문제" 2-, 2008

16 한중일3국공동역사편찬위원회, "미래를 여는 역사" 한겨레출판사 178-179, 2005

17 양정현, "목표설정에서 평가까지-현대사 수업 사례-" 역사교육 45 : 1999

18 다카시마 노부요시, "교과서 검정제도와 교육의 정치적 중립-일본에 있어서 민주주의 확립의 노력" 부산대 역사교육과 특별강연록 2008

19 방지원, "고등학교 『한국 근ㆍ현대사』 교과서 내용 구성 방식의 비교 - ‘사료’와 ‘탐구’를 중심으로" 한국역사교육학회 6 (6): 91-132, 2007

20 오끼나와’, "MBC 3·1절 특집다큐멘터리"