RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      A STUDY ON THE EVALUATION OF PORT SERVICE QUALITY = THE CASE OF EAST ASIAN PORTS

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102675597

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In the light of fierce competition among container ports, service quality is recognised as a main factor influencing the competitive position and selection of ports. The primary objective of this study is twofold: to develop a measurement of port service quality and port service systems, and to evaluate the overall service levels of competitive container ports in Korea and China. The current study employs a series of focus group interviews to test contents validity of port service attributes and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to identify the major port service factors. In addition, this study adopts the analytic hierarchical process (AHP) to explore the relative importance among the service quality factors and service systems in container ports. Finally, the concept of “house of quality” is adopted to evaluate the overall port service level as well as the port service levels for each port service system. The Chinese ports represent a higher service level than the Korean ports due to their higher scores in reliability and cost advantage evaluated as most critical factors in port service quality.
      The present empirical research implies that higher performance and competitiveness in container industry should be supported by superior differentiated service quality and activities. The current empirical study is a meaningful experiment integrating port service quality factors and port service systems and, consequently, can present more detailed and reliable information about the strengths and weaknesses of each port and provide some guidance to improve their service competitiveness.
      번역하기

      In the light of fierce competition among container ports, service quality is recognised as a main factor influencing the competitive position and selection of ports. The primary objective of this study is twofold: to develop a measurement of port serv...

      In the light of fierce competition among container ports, service quality is recognised as a main factor influencing the competitive position and selection of ports. The primary objective of this study is twofold: to develop a measurement of port service quality and port service systems, and to evaluate the overall service levels of competitive container ports in Korea and China. The current study employs a series of focus group interviews to test contents validity of port service attributes and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to identify the major port service factors. In addition, this study adopts the analytic hierarchical process (AHP) to explore the relative importance among the service quality factors and service systems in container ports. Finally, the concept of “house of quality” is adopted to evaluate the overall port service level as well as the port service levels for each port service system. The Chinese ports represent a higher service level than the Korean ports due to their higher scores in reliability and cost advantage evaluated as most critical factors in port service quality.
      The present empirical research implies that higher performance and competitiveness in container industry should be supported by superior differentiated service quality and activities. The current empirical study is a meaningful experiment integrating port service quality factors and port service systems and, consequently, can present more detailed and reliable information about the strengths and weaknesses of each port and provide some guidance to improve their service competitiveness.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • 1. INTRODUCTION
      • 2. LITERATURE REVIEW
      • 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
      • 4. EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
      • Abstract
      • 1. INTRODUCTION
      • 2. LITERATURE REVIEW
      • 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
      • 4. EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
      • 5. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS
      • REFERENCES
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼