RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      AHCI SCOPUS KCI등재

      INTERPRETATIONS OF THE DOCTRINE OF THE MEAN BY CHOSŎN CONFUCIAN SCHOLARS : TRADITIONAL/THEORETICAL AND REVISIONIST/PRACTICAL

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100261906

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      A thorough understanding of the study of the Classics in the Chosŏn dynasty requires careful analysis of all of the classics. In this article, I will focus on one specific classical book, the Doctrine of the Mean. The interpretation of the Doctrine...

      A thorough understanding of the study of the Classics in the Chosŏn dynasty requires careful analysis of all of the classics. In this article, I will focus on one specific classical book, the Doctrine of the Mean. The interpretation of the Doctrine of the Mean can be divided into two main academic scholarly groups: one group deepened and developed the Neo-Confucian system of thought inherited from Zhu Xi, while the other em-phasized the superior practical applications of the original Confucian philosophy and criticized the theory of Neo-Confucianism as too ideological without clear practical ap-plication. The former group emphasized two points. First, they expanded the theory of self-cultivation to include Neo-Confucianist theory concerning mind-nature. Second, pro-ponents of this group eventually developed the Neo- Confucianist theory of mind-nature as one of the core topics in the seventeenth-century Horak debate. The second group scholars rejected Zhu Xi’s authority with respect to the Doctrine of the Mean, including, for example, his thirty-three-chapter system of dividing the pre-viously undivided text of the book. Instead, this group criticized Zhu Xi’s addition of two chapters of his own to the Doctrine of the Mean, and used their own chapter system to divide the book, excluding Zhu Xi’s additions. They not only criticized Zhu Xi’s stance on metaphysical analysis, but also emphasized that the core of the Doctrine of the Mean should be to put the course of the Mean into practice in everyday life and human relations.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • ABSTRACT
      • I. INTRODUCTION
      • II. THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEO-CONFUCIANIM
      • 1. The Development of Chosŏn Neo-Confucianism: The T’oegye School and Yulgok School
      • 2. The Deepening of Chosŏn Neo-Confucianism: Han Wŏn-jin and Kim Wŏn-haeng
      • ABSTRACT
      • I. INTRODUCTION
      • II. THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEO-CONFUCIANIM
      • 1. The Development of Chosŏn Neo-Confucianism: The T’oegye School and Yulgok School
      • 2. The Deepening of Chosŏn Neo-Confucianism: Han Wŏn-jin and Kim Wŏn-haeng
      • III. CRITICAL INSIGHTS INTO NEO-CONFUCIANISM
      • 1. Original Confucianism’s Emphasis on Practicality: Yun Hyu and Pak Se-dang
      • 2. Encouraging the Possibility of Becoming True to the Way of the Human : Yi IK and Chong Yag-yong
      • IV. CONCLUSION
      • REFERENCES
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼