RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      주자와 간재의 명덕설(明德說) 그리고 역사문화 의식의 차이 = Difference in Ming De between Zhu xi and Gan jae in terms of Zeitgeist

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104222820

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this thesis, the difference in Ming de between Zhu xi and Gan jae is examined through their oriented Zeitgeist. Zhu xi defines Ming de as xing, and Gan jae does as xin. Because Korea’s Xing Li Xue is based on Zhuxism, some one states his own Ming de accords with Zhu xi no matter he defines Ming de as xing or xin. Gan jae is no exception also. In this paper, I don’t actively discuss about accordance with Gan jae’s Ming de and Zhu xi’s Ming de. It is a meaningful discussion in the academic history, but is not in philosophical way. I think one philosophical ideology has to have the writer’s ideal zeitgeist. In this way, I will not give any positive word to the theory without the writer’s zeitgeist, even though that theory does accord with Zhu xi’s Ming de. I will investigate the reason of the difference in Ming de between Zhu xi and Gan jae through diagnosis of their eras and difference with their own Zeitgeist.
      번역하기

      In this thesis, the difference in Ming de between Zhu xi and Gan jae is examined through their oriented Zeitgeist. Zhu xi defines Ming de as xing, and Gan jae does as xin. Because Korea’s Xing Li Xue is based on Zhuxism, some one states his own Ming...

      In this thesis, the difference in Ming de between Zhu xi and Gan jae is examined through their oriented Zeitgeist. Zhu xi defines Ming de as xing, and Gan jae does as xin. Because Korea’s Xing Li Xue is based on Zhuxism, some one states his own Ming de accords with Zhu xi no matter he defines Ming de as xing or xin. Gan jae is no exception also. In this paper, I don’t actively discuss about accordance with Gan jae’s Ming de and Zhu xi’s Ming de. It is a meaningful discussion in the academic history, but is not in philosophical way. I think one philosophical ideology has to have the writer’s ideal zeitgeist. In this way, I will not give any positive word to the theory without the writer’s zeitgeist, even though that theory does accord with Zhu xi’s Ming de. I will investigate the reason of the difference in Ming de between Zhu xi and Gan jae through diagnosis of their eras and difference with their own Zeitgeist.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼